Nirbhaya: story of Betrayal
Nirbhaya case that happened during UPA tenure drew the attention of the state towards rape cases and its victims. The resultant uproar and debate forced the govt to bring certain changes in the law related to rape victims.
The way the country responded to Nirbhaya case, one would have assumed that the rape cases would dwindle in the country. Unfortunately even during these four years of NDA, rape cases dominated the media.
Ironically the leaders within the govt seemed to be active in hushing up many a rape cases. When the very registering of a complaint by the rape victim looks hazardous, how one can expect a speedy justice from the state.?
In this country both acid attack victims and rape victims are fellow travelers. Both are an attack on the very persona of a woman. Rape victim suffers psychologically while acid attack victim suffers both physically and mentally to face the society and build the life all over again. Though acid attack is purportedly physical it intensely affects the mind of the victim.
As the society puts a premium on the physical beauty, the acid attack victim lives like an untouchable. Irony is that in both these ghastly cases the perpetrators of the crime go unpunished. The way the victims are treated during trial stage may be a major factor for this injustice. The rape victims are hesitant to wage an open protest against the perpetrator. Our society instead of looking down upon the perpetrator treats the victim harshly.
Precisely for this reason, the law enables the state to provide instant compensation to the victim to instill a sense of confidence. A separate fund has been established for this purpose in 2013. Irrespective of whether the victim gets justice in the ensuing legal battle, the state should provide for their rehabilitation instantly.
Tragic aspect of the whole deliberation is that only 23 victims from 9 states have received compensation from this fund. As per the National Legal service Authority only 510 rape victims were benefited with any compensation. Is the Govt stating that the victims of rape are only 500? If not, what explains the failure of the govt to compensate others?
The SC has already suggested that The National Legal Cell Authority can suo moto take up the issue and disburse compensation to the victims. The Court has ordered that all the states and UTs should provide compensation from minimum Rs. Five lakhs to maximum Rs. Ten lakhs.
In cases of rape and murder or mass rape the compensation is Rs. 10 lakhs. If the victim sustains 80% physical disability or severe disability and additional amount of minimum Rs. Five lakhs should be disbursed according to the honorable court.
In Acid attacks depending on the severity of attack Rs. 5-6 lakhs should be instantly disbursed irrespective of trial proceedings.
Rs. one lakh should be disbursed within fifteen days of the said incident and in the subsequent two months two lakh each should be disbursed. If the victim is a minor the compensation amount should be increased by 50% .
When the victim is suffering socially and psychologically this compensation would provide her some fillip. The compensation will also help the victim to meet the expenses of medical treatment, rehabilitation and legal battle. However the bureaucratic machinery seems to be trying its level best to hinder the speedy disbursement to the victim.
Police dilly dally even to register a complaint from the sexually harassed women. In case they are forced to register, they will get even with the victim by delaying the disbursement of the compensation.
If the victim belongs to oppressed class the compensation is pocketed by middlemen according to reports. According to a report submitted to SC, In 2017, 901 sexual harassment cases were reported from AP; however only one victim was provided with compensation.
In Rajasthan 3305 FIRs were registered; and only 140 victims received compensation. Similarly in Bihar 1199 FIRs were filed, while only 82 received relief. Even if we look at the quantum of relief, maximum relief was to the tune of Rs. 7000.
Though the society debates animatedly whether the perpetrator of the crime should be awarded capital punishment or not, there is a need to bring to the fore the punishment meted out to the victim indirectly. The society needs to discuss this dereliction of duty by the state.
One should not suffer for the crime one has not committed. The first step to ensure this is to see that the compensation stipulated by the law reaches the victim without any hassle or obstacle.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Inappropriate for MLAs seeking free IPL tickets, says D.K. Suresh
Bengaluru: Bengaluru Milk Union Ltd President D.K. Suresh on Monday said it is inappropriate for MLAs to seek free IPL tickets, adding that those interested in watching matches should pay for them personally.
Speaking to reporters near his residence in Sadashivanagar, he said, “IPL is a commercial tournament and does not represent the country. It is not right for public representatives to focus too much on such matters.”
Referring to the recent controversy during the RCB celebrations, he said, “let us find out who benefited the most from the statements made during the incident.” He also pointed out that BJP MLAs had received IPL tickets as well.
Responding to discussions about relocating the Chinnaswamy Stadium, Suresh said the government has already approved the construction of a new stadium at a location he had proposed.
“I had suggested building a stadium in Surya City and submitted a proposal for it. Bengaluru needs four stadiums in four directions to cater to its growing population and encourage youth participation in sports,” he said.
He noted that apart from Kanteerava Stadium, KSCA, and the Football Stadium, there are limited facilities in the city.
“When I was a Lok Sabha member, I had proposed allocating 100 acres in my constituency at Surya City. The land was later earmarked and the plan approved,” he added.
Suresh said he has discussed the project with Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan, Rajiv Gandhi Housing Corporation Chairman Shivalingegowda, and Anekal MLA Shivanna.
“The Cabinet has now approved the project, and a stadium will be developed on around 50–60 acres,” he said.
He further added that he has requested the Deputy Chief Minister to build another stadium at Shivarama Karanth Layout through the BDA, where 40 acres have been allocated. Plans are also being discussed to develop a well-equipped stadium in Bidadi.
Commending state government's recent bilingual policy move, Suresh said forcing children to learn three languages could affect their comprehension.
“It is a good decision to make two languages compulsory. Learning a third language should be left to the choice of students and parents,” he said.
Responding to criticism from BJP leaders, he said their tendency is to oppose every decision of the government.
“To please their central leadership, they take a pro-Hindi stance. Instead, they should advocate for the adoption of Kannada in all states,” he said.
When asked about the earlier three-language policy under Congress, he said, “the situation is different now. Today, the focus should be on quality learning. Kannada should remain the primary language, while students and parents can choose an additional language.”
