Nirbhaya: story of Betrayal
Nirbhaya case that happened during UPA tenure drew the attention of the state towards rape cases and its victims. The resultant uproar and debate forced the govt to bring certain changes in the law related to rape victims.
The way the country responded to Nirbhaya case, one would have assumed that the rape cases would dwindle in the country. Unfortunately even during these four years of NDA, rape cases dominated the media.
Ironically the leaders within the govt seemed to be active in hushing up many a rape cases. When the very registering of a complaint by the rape victim looks hazardous, how one can expect a speedy justice from the state.?
In this country both acid attack victims and rape victims are fellow travelers. Both are an attack on the very persona of a woman. Rape victim suffers psychologically while acid attack victim suffers both physically and mentally to face the society and build the life all over again. Though acid attack is purportedly physical it intensely affects the mind of the victim.
As the society puts a premium on the physical beauty, the acid attack victim lives like an untouchable. Irony is that in both these ghastly cases the perpetrators of the crime go unpunished. The way the victims are treated during trial stage may be a major factor for this injustice. The rape victims are hesitant to wage an open protest against the perpetrator. Our society instead of looking down upon the perpetrator treats the victim harshly.
Precisely for this reason, the law enables the state to provide instant compensation to the victim to instill a sense of confidence. A separate fund has been established for this purpose in 2013. Irrespective of whether the victim gets justice in the ensuing legal battle, the state should provide for their rehabilitation instantly.
Tragic aspect of the whole deliberation is that only 23 victims from 9 states have received compensation from this fund. As per the National Legal service Authority only 510 rape victims were benefited with any compensation. Is the Govt stating that the victims of rape are only 500? If not, what explains the failure of the govt to compensate others?
The SC has already suggested that The National Legal Cell Authority can suo moto take up the issue and disburse compensation to the victims. The Court has ordered that all the states and UTs should provide compensation from minimum Rs. Five lakhs to maximum Rs. Ten lakhs.
In cases of rape and murder or mass rape the compensation is Rs. 10 lakhs. If the victim sustains 80% physical disability or severe disability and additional amount of minimum Rs. Five lakhs should be disbursed according to the honorable court.
In Acid attacks depending on the severity of attack Rs. 5-6 lakhs should be instantly disbursed irrespective of trial proceedings.
Rs. one lakh should be disbursed within fifteen days of the said incident and in the subsequent two months two lakh each should be disbursed. If the victim is a minor the compensation amount should be increased by 50% .
When the victim is suffering socially and psychologically this compensation would provide her some fillip. The compensation will also help the victim to meet the expenses of medical treatment, rehabilitation and legal battle. However the bureaucratic machinery seems to be trying its level best to hinder the speedy disbursement to the victim.
Police dilly dally even to register a complaint from the sexually harassed women. In case they are forced to register, they will get even with the victim by delaying the disbursement of the compensation.
If the victim belongs to oppressed class the compensation is pocketed by middlemen according to reports. According to a report submitted to SC, In 2017, 901 sexual harassment cases were reported from AP; however only one victim was provided with compensation.
In Rajasthan 3305 FIRs were registered; and only 140 victims received compensation. Similarly in Bihar 1199 FIRs were filed, while only 82 received relief. Even if we look at the quantum of relief, maximum relief was to the tune of Rs. 7000.
Though the society debates animatedly whether the perpetrator of the crime should be awarded capital punishment or not, there is a need to bring to the fore the punishment meted out to the victim indirectly. The society needs to discuss this dereliction of duty by the state.
One should not suffer for the crime one has not committed. The first step to ensure this is to see that the compensation stipulated by the law reaches the victim without any hassle or obstacle.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Rohit identifies Arshdeep, Hardik as key to India's chances in T20 World Cup
New Delhi (PTI): T20 World Cup-winning captain Rohit Sharma reckons all-rounder Hardik Pandya and left-arm seamer Arshdeep Singh will hold the key to India's prospects in the upcoming edition of the tournament.
Defending champions India will enter the T20 showpiece as one of the overwhelming favourites due to their massive depth and quality.
Rohit highlighted Arshdeep's effectiveness with the new ball and at the death.
"It is a big positive to have both Jasprit Bumrah and Arshdeep Singh together because they always attack for wickets. Arshdeep's biggest strength is swinging the new ball and taking early wickets. He mainly bowls with the new ball and at the death. Starting and finishing are the most important phases, and he is strong in both," Rohit told JioHotstar.
"With the new ball, he swings it to get left-handers caught in the slips and targets the pads of right-handers. He has also started taking the ball away from right-handers. These skills are key for a new-ball bowler. He always tries to take wickets, which is why he bowls the first over."
Rohit added, "In the 2024 T20 World Cup final against South Africa, he did a great job. I still remember he dismissed Quinton de Kock when he was set and batting well. In the 19th over, he gave away just two or three runs, which built pressure on the South Africans.
"That is his game, bowling with the new ball and at the death, and he will play a key role for India in the 2026 T20 World Cup."
India won the last edition of the tournament in the Americas under Rohit's captaincy, after which the dashing opener retired from the T20 format internationally.
Rohit also spoke about how Hardik's dual role as a finisher and multi-phase bowler provides crucial balance to the Indian team.
"Whenever Hardik Pandya is in the team, his role is huge. He bats and bowls very consistently. His batting is crucial when the team is stuck. If we have a score of 160 on the board in 15-16 overs and Hardik is batting, then he's the one who can help the team reach 210-220 from there or if we are 50 for 4, he has to build the innings.
"Batting in the middle order at 5, 6, or 7 is very tough. That is why Hardik's role is critical in any format. We know his bowling. He bowls in key phases, with the new ball, in the middle and in the death as well. His role is very important because he gives the team balance, letting us play six bowlers and keep our batting deep."
Rohit said accommodating both Kuldeep Yadav and Varun Chakravarthy together in the playing XI is going to be a big challenge for the Indian team management.
"The biggest challenge for captain Suryakumar Yadav and coach Gautam Gambhir will be how to play both Kuldeep Yadav and Varun Chakaravarthy together. If you want that combination, you can only do it if you play with two seamers, which is a big challenge.
"But honestly, I would be tempted to play both Varun and Kuldeep because they are wicket-takers and batters struggle to read them. I would surely pick them."
The former India skipper added, "Looking at the conditions in India, like in this New Zealand series, there is a lot of dew. In February and March, dew will be heavy across most parts as winter ends.
"Even in Mumbai, which doesn't get cold, there's still dew. I'd say 90-95 percent of grounds in India have dew. That's the challenge. What do the coach and captain think? Are they comfortable with three spinners? Then they can play spin, but there's no fixed rule. It depends on the team leaders' thinking."
Rohit also urged Kuldeep to stop appealing on every ball and to rely on the wicketkeeper's judgment for reviews.
"My one simple advice to Kuldeep is to just bowl quietly and go back to his mark. You can't appeal on every ball. This is basic. I keep saying it, but it still happens often. Even after telling him many times, he appeals at every chance. You have to use your head. Just because it touches the pad, it doesn't mean it's out every time. This isn't gully cricket.
"I get he is enthusiastic, but think of the team first. Each team only gets two DRS reviews. If I was the keeper, I could see where the ball pitched and if it was hitting, I could tell the bowler.
"But from covers or slip, you don't know the angle. You have to listen to what the keeper and bowler say. That's why when there's a review off Kuldeep's bowling, I don't look at him, I look at the keeper to decide."
The T20 World Cup is scheduled to be held in venues across India and Sri Lanka from February 7 to March 8.
