Whether one person should contest from two constituencies is a question that’s more pragmatic than being a simple query. The fact remains that the candidate knows he cannot represent two constituencies simultaneously. And the voters are also aware that he/she will finally resign from one place, in case the person manages to win from both.
In case the candidate is known for his work, the voters vote for him with the hope that he would represent their constituency. But in the instance of a victory in both places, the candidate will have to give up one seat for sure by way of resigning. This action will impose another election on the constituency. In the recent past, PM Narendra Modi had contested from two places. Now Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah has also chosen to contest from two constituencies. In fact, he would be contesting from three constituencies! His son Dr Yatheendra is contesting from Varuna constituency. And he will have to seek votes in his father’s name since not too many people are familiar with Yatheendra.
When and if people choose Yatheendra, it would be a mandate favouring his more famous father. The need to contest from two seats is an inevitable challenge that Siddaramaiah has to face now. Both JD(S) and BJP have been planning strategies to create a rift between Siddaramaiah and his party, Congress. If he has to be weakened, Siddaramaiah has to be extricated from the party. This serves another purpose of weakening the Congress too by creating leadership chaos. This desire is not just that of BJP and JD(S), but there are scores of people even within Congress who wish for this. The opposition parties know very well that Siddaramaiah brought a fresh lease of life into Congress with his leadership and tenure of being the CM of the state. There are not too many leaders in Congress who can reach commoners the way Siddaramaiah does. Hence if Siddaramaiah loses the Chamundeshwari seat, the Congress high command will keep him at a distance owing to his failure. This would mark the end of his political career. Vishwanath, Srinivas Prasad and other defectors from Congress have a single point agenda – that is to end Siddaramaiah’s political career. But if you ask them which other leader would they present to the state in case they manage to close Siddaramaiah’s political career, they do not have any answer.
Initially, Siddaramaiah was to contest only from Chamundeshwari. Having said that, Congress retracted its statement within two days of announcing this. Siddaramaiah cleared all the roadblocks to seeking a second seat to ensure victory from his party high command.
As a statesman and politician Siddaramaiah should be actively involved in Karnataka politics for a long time to come. Some people may feel vicarious pleasure by hoping to defeat him. But in today’s situation, we can hardly find a leader of his stature and vision to tackle poverty, to ensure the poor are empowered in the process. His understanding of economics coupled with socialism is a terrific combination.
It is very tough to imagine the House without Siddaramaiah’s presence. He is known for his straight talk which may appear rude to some people. But he was not corrupt and will never be corrupt in the future either. He has retained his individuality beyond the culture of Congress party. Hence, to escape the trap laid by his political opponents and their wish to end his career, the need to contest from two seats is not only inevitable to Siddaramaiah, but it is also the need of the Vidhana Sabha too!
Hence instead of wasting his political career being turning a martyr to the plot hatched by his opponents, it would be strategically intelligent to create Plan B and save his career from ending at once. The ones who accuse Siddaramaiah of having trained his eyes on Badami, state he has done so with the fear of losing in Chamundeshwari. However, if one is to ask them to mention why Siddaramaiah fears a failure in Chamundeshwari, they are unable to articulate and mention even a handful of reasons to support their claims.
It could still be understood if one feels Siddaramaiah may be rejected in Chamundeshwari for not having done enough for the development of the constituency or for having given bad administration. But if the fear of losing Chamundeshwari is due to the nexus reached by JD(S), BJP and some Congress leaders clandestinely, it cannot be called Siddaramaiah’s failure.
In fact, it is commendable that the CM has chosen a prominent city in North Karnataka to his rescue. If he gets elected from here, it could be good for the region too. North Karnataka might as well prosper better than before with him as their MLA.
People in North Karnataka are pretty upset with Bangalore centric focus of development. By selecting Badami as his alternate plan, Siddaramaiah has created a bridge between North and South of Karnataka. As a politician, he may be able to pay heed and understand the challenges of North Karnataka from close quarters. There couldn’t be a better person than Siddaramaiah to solve the problems relating to drought, and farmers from the area. In case he wins from both constituencies, he should retain his Badami seat and continue his work. This is the respect a south Karnataka politician can give to north Karnataka region.
Whether Congress wins this election with majority or loses, Siddaramaiah should not lose this elections. There are many such people like Siddaramaiah in other parties too. All of them should win and enter the house this time. There was a time when a deserving candidate stood for elections, other parties would refuse to get their candidates into the fray. The most deserving candidate would win the election with ease. Every party would cooperate with that intention of bringing the best minds into the House. But today, in a rather ironic manner, the forces that have Dalit movement background seem to have come together against Siddaramaiah. This opportunistic politics ca never deliver good results to the society.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Houston (US) (PTI): Texas Governor Greg Abbott has ordered state agencies and public universities to immediately halt new H-1B visa petitions, tightening hiring rules at taxpayer-funded institutions, a step likely to impact Indian professionals.
The freeze will remain in effect through May 2027.
The directive issued on Tuesday said that the state agencies and public universities must stop filing new petitions unless they receive written approval from the Texas Workforce Commission.
The governor's order, in a red state that is home to thousands of H-1B visa holders, comes as the Trump administration has initiated steps to reshape the visa programme.
“In light of recent reports of abuse in the federal H-1B visa programme, and amid the federal government’s ongoing review of that programme to ensure American jobs are going to American workers, I am directing all state agencies to immediately freeze new H-1B visa petitions as outlined in this letter,” Abbot said.
Institutions must also report on H-1B usage, including numbers, job roles, countries of origin, and visa expiry dates, the letter said.
US President Donald Trump on September 19 last year signed a proclamation ‘Restriction on entry of certain non-immigrant workers’ that restricted the entry into the US of those workers whose H-1B petitions are not accompanied or supplemented by a payment of USD 1,00,000.
The H1-B visa fee of USD 1,00,000 would be applicable only to new applicants, i.e. all new H-1B visa petitions submitted after September 21, including those for the FY2026 lottery.
Indians make up an estimated 71 per cent of all approved H-1B applications in recent years, according to US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), with China in the second spot. The major fields include technology, engineering, medicine, and research.
Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) is the second-highest beneficiary with 5,505 approved H-1B visas in 2025, after Amazon (10,044 workers on H-1B visas), according to the USCIS. Other top beneficiaries include Microsoft (5,189), Meta (5,123), Apple (4,202), Google (4,181), Deloitte (2,353), Infosys (2,004), Wipro (1,523) and Tech Mahindra Americas (951).
Texas public universities employ hundreds of foreign faculty and researchers, many from India, across engineering, healthcare, and technology fields.
Date from Open Doors -- a comprehensive information resource on international students and scholars studying or teaching at higher education institutions in the US -- for 2022-2023 showed 2,70,000 students from India embarked on graduate and undergraduate degrees in US universities, accounting for 25 per cent of the international student population in the US and 1.5 per cent of the total student population.
Indian students infuse roughly USD 10 billion annually into universities and related businesses across the country through tuition and other expenses – while also creating around 93,000 jobs, according to the Open Doors data.
Analysts warn the freeze could slow recruitment of highly skilled professionals, affecting academic research and innovation.
Supporters say the directive protects local jobs, while critics caution it could weaken Texas’ competitiveness in higher education and research.
The order comes amid broader debate in the US over skilled immigration and state-level interventions in federal programmes.
H-1B visas allow US companies to hire technically-skilled professionals that are not easily available in America. Initially granted for three years, these can be extended for another three years.
In September 2025, Trump had also signed an executive order ‘The Gold Card’, aimed at setting up a new visa pathway for those committed to supporting the United States; with individuals who can pay USD 1 million to the US Treasury, or USD 2 million if a corporation is sponsoring them, to get access to expedited visa treatment and a path to a Green Card.
