Olympics: Politics of Claiming Credit for Medals
An Indian athlete’s javelin throw has won a gold medal in the Tokyo Olympics. Neeraj Chopra, the proud son of a farmer, created history with this gold medal, the first in Tokyo Olympics and the second for India in the history of Olympics itself. This momentous win that needs to be celebrated is a joyous as well as a sad occasion. It is at the same time embarrassing that a country such as India boasting enormous human resources could garner only two gold medals when several poor countries in the world have bagged gold medals by the dozens and are celebrating. It is also true that the talented Indian youth are winning these medals for the country by overcoming all obstacles that the politicization of sports has created for them. While Ravi Kumar Dahiya and Mirabai Chanu won silver medals in wrestling and weightlifting respectively, P.V. Sindhu in badminton, Lovlina Borgohain in women’s boxing, and Bajarang Punia in wrestling were the bronze medal winners besides the Indian men’s hockey team that created history. The performance of the women’s hockey team won the hearts of Indians even in their defeat. The achievement of the athletes assumes even more significance in the light of the neglect that Indian athletics faces by both the administration and the people alike. These athletes who faced all odds and emerged successful are similar to the flowers blooming in fire.
The developments that followed the victory of these athletes is true to the popular saying: ‘Success has many fathers, while failure is an orphan.’ Politicians are trying to gain mileage out of the success of these medal winning athletes. At the same time, their achievements are also being projected as that of the government. While on the one hand, the Prime Minister is playing political dramatics on the pretext of congratulating the athletes, on the other hand, fake screenshots are being shared as though the Prime Minister himself participated in the Olympics and won medals! Fake news is being peddled to make it sound that Prime Minister Modi is responsible for the achievements of the athletes. While congratulating the hockey team, Modi issued several unnecessary political statements and used the occasion to hurl allegations against the Opposition. This is nothing but an insult to sporting ethics. Sports is beyond caste, religion, and politics. Politicians, who refuse to understand this, try to intervene and project the achievements of sportsmen as their own.
Instead of trying to share the glory of sportspersons, the least those who govern us can do is to introspect on what exactly is their contribution towards this success.. If the Modi government had announced programmes, grants, or special gifts to encourage athletics as these young men and women were toiling to make it to the Olympics, at least then the government’s attempt to politicize their achievement could have made some sense. Forget providing additional grants, the government even reduced sports budget by Rs 230 crore. It also cut by Rs 232 crore the grants under ‘Khelo India.’ Also, it cut by 50 per cent the grants given for the national sports development. It also reduced grants to modernize the Commonwealth Games Stadium from Rs 75 crore to Rs 30 crore. Ironically, at the same time, it spent a lot of money for the development of the world’s largest cricket stadium in Gujarat and the credit for giving the stadium his own name should go to Prime Minister Modi. He is now facing a lot of criticism for trying to project in the media as though he participated in the Olympics and won medals.
It is disappointing if an analysis is made about how the javelin section that got India its gold was encouraged by the system. Coach Uwe Hohn had expressing his outrage about the lack of encouragement in June last year. He had issued a public statement that ‘the country’s sports associations have completely failed to adequately prepare the athletes who are participating in the Olympics. It has not been possible to provide the required nutrition for its athletes.’ He said: ‘I am not sure if the sports associations are negligent about this or if they are not even aware about these aspects. When I came here to take on this assignment, I was confident that I would be able to bring about some change. But now I don’t think it’s possible,’. When Hohn issued this statement, nobody could have predicted that our athlete Chopra would bag the gold medal. After winning the medal, he has been flooded with gifts galore. While several states announced cash awards, several organizations have come forward to indulge him with gifts perhaps to gain publicity. It is heartening to see this but more than the encouragement an athlete receives after winning, he needs to be encouraged in his journey towards victory. While the government gifts Rs 1 crore to those who have won a gold medal, the same government is not willing to spend the same amount to prepare these athletes to win.
This is similar to the mindset of a farmer who adds manure to coconut trees if the trees give good yield whereas the trees need good manure, water, and nourishment from the beginning to be able to give good yield. India is a country of a rough terrain with hills and rocks. It is a country of hardworking people who struggle and toil hard. In such a country, it is easy to create athletes. But this process should start from the ground level by identifying suitable persons and cleansing the sports sector of politics. It is not possible to expect good yields tomorrow by sowing seeds today. Long-term programmes should be designed. Athletes are born in poor families where children struggle because of malnutrition. If children grow without nutritious food, how can they achieve anything in the future? Talented athletes should be identified in childhood itself and nurtured from young age. Only then can politicians stake claim in their achievements.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Bill to regulate deepfakes tabled in Lok Sabha
New Delhi (PTI): A Private Member's Bill seeking a clear legal framework for regulation of deepfakes has been introduced in the Lok Sabha.
The Regulation of Deepfake Bill, introduced by Shiv Sena leader Shrikant Shinde in the House on Friday, aims to protect citizens by mandating prior consent from individuals depicted in deepfake content.
"Misuse of deepfakes for harassment, deception and misinformation has escalated, creating an urgent need for regulatory safeguards," Shinde said.
The Bill also lists penalties for offenders creating or disseminating deepfake content with malicious intent.
"With advancements in artificial intelligence and deep learning, deepfake technology has emerged as a significant tool for media manipulation. While the technology has potential applications in education, entertainment and creative fields, it also poses severe risks when misused, threatening individual privacy, national security and public trust," Shinde said in the statement of objects and reasons in the Bill.
The proposed Bill seeks to establish a clear legal framework to govern the creation, distribution and application of deepfakes in India, said Shinde, a three-term Lok Sabha member from Kalyan.
The Bill also seeks to establish the Deepfake Task Force, a dedicated body to combat national security implications and evaluate the influence of deepfakes on privacy, civic participation, and potential election interference.
The task force will collaborate with academic and private sector institutions to develop technologies that detect manipulated content, thereby promoting credibility in digital media.
The Bill also proposes to establish a fund to support public and private sector initiatives in the detection and deterrence of advanced image manipulation.
A Private Member's Bill is a procedure of Parliament that enables lawmakers, who are not ministers, to draw attention to issues that might not be represented in Government Bills or to highlight the issues and gaps in the existing legal framework that require legislative intervention.
