Open book examination: A revolutionary idea
Primary and higher education minister N Mahesh has referred to the idea of conducting open book examinations to the children of smaller classes. In our country, the only ‘change’ we see in education system is the change in topics covered in text books while all other aspects remain the same.
All political parties would be waiting to fill text books with their agenda and propaganda, to create their future set of supporters. But, there is hardly any party that thinks of changing the approach to education. Hence, learning is always associated with mugging up. Learning in school is directly related to mugging up even more than usual, for the sake of answering question papers. Schools often train their students to score more marks since the hall mark of an excellent school is a well-scoring student.
No one spares a thought about how this would help children in the future. Children mug up the whole year to reproduce all that in a matter of three hours during exams. Which means, someone who can memorise everything taught to him would be considered the best. Hence, those who can remember are considered better than those who understand and comprehend with the information they have been taught in order to implement it well.
In this context, minister’s idea of open book examination is really a revolutionary one. This method has the capacity to reinvent the effectiveness of learning and development of the student. Learning should not be limited to marks card alone and discussions should focus on designing methods to improve ways of knowledge retention and heightened awareness among young minds. When Minister Mahesh spoke about this, many people ridiculed the idea. Some sought to know ‘how can you call it an exam when you give them the very book which has the answer?’
We need to understand one thing rather seriously. Thousands of students end their lives every year unable to withstand the pressure of exams and having to score marks that could sometimes be beyond their capacity. Many others become victims of depression and other psychological problems that need remedies.
Governments have not paid much attention to student suicides as much as they debate on farmers’ suicides. Parents, educational institutions and the whole set up of education itself are guilty of killing these young children. The whole case gets over in ‘student fails in exams; kills self’ kind of headlines. A whole life is snuffed out like that. Failing in examinations is seen as failing in life itself. Who pushed them to killing self? Who abets these deaths? Why can they not be held for abetment of suicide?
Who makes life miserable for young boys and girls? Why is education withering away the lives instead of helping them blossom? Why are lakhs of graduates who withstand all these pressures roaming the streets jobless and aimless in life? The proposal put forth by the minister Mahesh needs to be examined for all its worth. Like a doctor studies all relevant books relating to the subject of medicine before he turns into a medical professional to check on the patients, and will not hesitate to consult additional books if he feels they hold more information to help his diagnosis we need to understand the issue at hand is larger than saying a mere yes or no. A lawyer does not mug up the case when he comes to the court instead he applies the knowledge he possesses to the particular case. Hence, mugging needs to retire from our education system.
This will free a lot of students from the burden of having to score even when he or she does not understand the topic. Students need to be taught to think freely rather than think as per instructions. Teachers need to teach them how this is done. For instance, let’s assume a student is answering a question about Kuvempu. When you ask ‘where was Kuvempu born?’ the answer to that is an information which may be mugged or merely remembered. But if one asks ‘what’s the moral of Kuvempu’s life?’ one is forcing the student to think on his own opinion. Hence teachers should encourage this kind of answers rather than information based ones. Because in times of technology, information is free and is available everywhere. But we need our students to turn into independent minds. This applies to all fields.
Minister Mahesh has just put forth an idea and this has to be debated upon. Teachers also need to be prepared to suit this changed requirement. Educationists have to debate on ways of making this relevant for our system. Governments need to work on changing the education system for better. This has to be done in phases. This changed scenario will ensure children grow into confident individuals and not scared ones. If this comes into force, students needn’t even feel guilty of being debarred since carrying a book won’t be a malpractice anymore! More than anything else, school will become a place where minds will blossom over the almost-jail set up we have now.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Modi should leverage his ties with world leaders to de-escalate war in West Asia: Omar Abdullah
Jammu (PTI): Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah on Monday said India can play a meaningful role in de-escalation in West Asia, given Prime Minister Narendra Modi's strong relations with the warring countries and their neighbours.
He said Pakistan was leveraging ties with Iran and the United States, and that any effort towards ending the war should be welcomed.
"As I said in the House (Assembly), we would like the war to end as soon as possible. The role that the prime minister can play may not be possible for anyone else because of his good relations with all these countries," Abdullah told reporters on the sidelines of a function here.
He, however, said any escalation would not be easy to manage.
"Any such move by US President Donald Trump, despite the long history of Iran resisting external domination, would not be easy," the chief minister said.
Asked about Pakistan mediating in the war, he said, "I will simply say that if any country can play a role in preventing this war, no one should have any objection to it."
He added, "I will repeat what I said … our prime minister has good and close relations with all countries — whether it is Israel, the United States, Iran, or the countries around Iran. If those relationships can be used to make some progress and help ease the situation, it would be a good thing."
Abdullah said attacks by terror groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed in India, as suggested by a report from the United States, are not unlikely.
Meanwhile, he asserted that any efforts to end the war, be it from Pakistan, must not be resisted.
"Pakistan is using its good relations with Iran and the United States to its advantage, and it has done so. How can we object to that? If that angle helps in stopping the war, would you want them not to act and let the war continue? We want the war to stop. If any country can play a role in that, it should. And if we can play an even better role, then we should do so," he said.
On unemployment in J-K, the chief minister said the issue cannot be resolved overnight, and government jobs alone are not the solution.
He stressed the need to explore alternative avenues, highlighting the importance of Mission Yuva in promoting entrepreneurship.
"Mission Yuva provides not just funding but also support in preparing DPRs and post-startup assistance, such as marketing. In just nine months, distributing Rs 1,000 crore and approving numerous schemes is a significant achievement," he said.
Abdullah credited the coordination between the government and Jammu and Kashmir Bank for the scheme's progress.
