Rafale Deal: A Shameless Silence!
When the country is still struggling with the second wave of the Coronavirus, the government finds itself caught in the Rafale whirlpool yet again.The controversy over the Rafale deal broke out much before the pandemic with several organizations approaching the Supreme Court demanding an investigation into the deal but without any success as the apex court held the view that that ‘there is no need for an investigation.’
The NDA government seems to have considered the Supreme Court’s stand as a clean chit for itself forgetting that there is a difference in saying that there is no need for an investigation and getting an acquittal after prosecution. When the CBI showed some interest in the Rafale deal, the government clipped its wings.. Everyone who demanded an investigation was portrayed as “having no concern for the national security.”
After Modi got elected for the second term, the Congress party also became silent over the Rafale deal. Just when it was assumed that the controversy had died down, it has now resurfaced with the French government ordering a judicial probe into a French company’s role in the alleged deal. This was after a French website published several explosive reports that millions of Euros were exchanged as part of the agreement between the Indian government and the French company, Dassault, and that Indian officials were also bribed. Transparency over the deal pertaining to the purchase of Rafale aircraft is more important to India than France as it could have an impact on India’s defence whereas for France it could only be an issue of financial irregularities.
Though it was the UPA government that laid the foundation for the controversial Rafale deal, it had roped in Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), the pride of India in the aviation sector, as a partner and the deal provided an opportunity for purchasing a large number of aircrafts at lower prices besides acquiring latest aircraft technologies. But after the Modi government came to power, significant changes were made to the deal including the questionable move of replacing HAL with Reliance that had no prior experience in the defence sector.
Not just that, as a part of the revised agreement, India agreed to pay more for fewer aircrafts. When a whiff of the large-scale irregularities was felt, protests were organized throughout the country with several investigating agencies raising doubts but all such suspicions were stamped down and several important letters of correspondence and documents went missing. In effect, the government put a lot of effort and made sure that no investigation could be carried out and gave itself a clean chit.
Similarly, decades ago, when the Bofors controversy broke out, an investigation was conducted but the investigation refuted Rajiv Gandhi’s involvement and gave him a clean chit. Arun Shourie who was then writing about the Bofors scam had said in a press conference that the Rafale deal is larger in magnitude than Bofors. Regardless of the fact that several journalists and lawyers approached the Supreme Court demanding an investigation into the Rafale deal, Prime Minister Modi should have on his own ordered an investigation. If it did not have any role in the deal, why is the Modi government hesitating to face an investigation? An investigation would not only shut the opposition but also increase Modi government’s credibility. More than anything else, it would resolve the concerns that people have over the nation’s security. Ironically, by not ordering an investigation, it is almost like Modi has in part accepted the allegations.
The French government’s investigation has given a fresh lease of life to the controversy with questions being raised over India’s silence. The Opposition is demanding an immediate investigation by a Joint Parliamentary Committee. When a country that is part of the deal has expressed its suspicion about financial irregularities, how can India that is a party to the deal not be anguished? If financial irregularities have indeed taken place, India has a lot to answer. Even then, why is the country’s “chowkidar” not uttering a word? This is shameless silence. The fact that an international controversy that has national ramifications on the army and defence sectors has not stirred the government to take cognizance of the issue could trigger yet another round of ‘Chowkidhaar Chor” slogans. Before such slogans can reverberate all across the country, the Chowkidhar must speak.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Bill to regulate deepfakes tabled in Lok Sabha
New Delhi (PTI): A Private Member's Bill seeking a clear legal framework for regulation of deepfakes has been introduced in the Lok Sabha.
The Regulation of Deepfake Bill, introduced by Shiv Sena leader Shrikant Shinde in the House on Friday, aims to protect citizens by mandating prior consent from individuals depicted in deepfake content.
"Misuse of deepfakes for harassment, deception and misinformation has escalated, creating an urgent need for regulatory safeguards," Shinde said.
The Bill also lists penalties for offenders creating or disseminating deepfake content with malicious intent.
"With advancements in artificial intelligence and deep learning, deepfake technology has emerged as a significant tool for media manipulation. While the technology has potential applications in education, entertainment and creative fields, it also poses severe risks when misused, threatening individual privacy, national security and public trust," Shinde said in the statement of objects and reasons in the Bill.
The proposed Bill seeks to establish a clear legal framework to govern the creation, distribution and application of deepfakes in India, said Shinde, a three-term Lok Sabha member from Kalyan.
The Bill also seeks to establish the Deepfake Task Force, a dedicated body to combat national security implications and evaluate the influence of deepfakes on privacy, civic participation, and potential election interference.
The task force will collaborate with academic and private sector institutions to develop technologies that detect manipulated content, thereby promoting credibility in digital media.
The Bill also proposes to establish a fund to support public and private sector initiatives in the detection and deterrence of advanced image manipulation.
A Private Member's Bill is a procedure of Parliament that enables lawmakers, who are not ministers, to draw attention to issues that might not be represented in Government Bills or to highlight the issues and gaps in the existing legal framework that require legislative intervention.
