RBI: Frying pan to fire
A tea seller can become the Prime Minister of the country. That would be the victory of democracy. At the same time, if a PM can choose a television serial actor to head the most significant portfolio of HRD ministry and be given the responsibility of looking after all universities; or appoint a person with graduation in history to be the governor of RBI, it would be a loss of the power democracy gives us.
A PM need not be highly educated but he has the choice of having experts and knowledgeable people around him. But what would happen if the PM was to have businessmen around him who would influence his every decision? The answer is right before us.
Shaktikanta Das has been chosen to be the governor of RBI. In the past, this chair was occupied by some of the best brains with expertise in economics at global level. This chair would now belong to a person with post-graduation in history and an added course in financial management. This has thrown the RBI from frying pan to fire.
RBI was going through tense moments when Raghuram Rajan was replaced by Urjit Patel. In the next few months of Patel assuming the post, government thrust demonetization on the nation. This decision had nothing to do with the RBI. This was the main reason for the failure of demonetization which was done to protect the interest of only few people.
Some corporate companies, political organisations and businessmen were the clear beneficiaries of this note ban. Common people suffered endlessly. Economy fell flat. Modi government used Urjit Patel who would be dancing according to the tune of the government.
Except for accounting for the old currency notes, Urjit Patel didn’t take any great decisions as the Governor of RBI. He had no plans to even help the country lift itself from the quagmire of economic distress that was progressing fast. He could not even explain the impact and long term results of note ban to the people of the nation. He woke up only when the government couldn’t recover the stashed black money, and note ban had a mammoth impact on the country’s progress.
Patel woke up only when the government was attempting to make RBI responsible for the failure of note ban. Though he was a puppet at the hands of Modi, Patel knew about the ill effects of note ban since he is an economic expert himself. He knew the country was headed to an economic distress. He couldn’t tolerate the fact the government would use him to commit more blunders and he was forced to speak out.
He began to speak to the media about the external influences working within the RBI and their impact. Patel was already close to tendering his resignation and he probably assumed it was better if he quit without having to commit more blunders to put RBI and nation into trouble.
This must have been an honest economist in him speaking up. RBI strongly protested against relaxing the norms of lending. If this was done, the banks could extend another four crore loan to the big corporate giants who also happen to be friends of Modi. Not only that, with the new circular that was issued out Feb 12, 2018 it was possible for the corporate companies who had already taken the loans to escape the bankruptcy noose.
With this, the Adani Group, Essaar and TATA could get an extended life for their electric projects. But since Patel saw how this could negatively impact the future of India, he did not want to risk this decision. Hence the puppet cut loose the string which was dictating his movements.
We can now easily imagine the forces that did not want former RBI governor Raghuram Rajan for the second term. His fate was sealed when he sent a list of NPA and businessmen who had used loans deviating from the purposes that they had raised them for.
With a plan to turn RBI into private treasury, Rajan was sent out and Patel was brought in. BJP was recognized as the richest party in the world post demonetization. Corporate companies got fatter. Now the government is all set to implement Section 7 to extend more privileges to corporate companies and make them even fatter and privileged at the cost risking the national economy time and again.
At a time like this, Patel has found an escape route. His resignation does not absolve him of all the wrongs he was party to. He needs to apologise to the nation for being part of demonetization.
Appointment of the new governor may well complicate the matters by that much. Shaktikanta Das supported note ban totally and he is also totally subservient to the Modi clan. He is not a financial expert at all. The way education sector was compromised with, having handed over the portfolio of human resource to Smriti Irani who allowed massive interference of RSS, Corporate powers are now planning to do the same with RBI by bringing in a man with history for his qualification so that they can mess it up totally. We can only hope this does not severely compromise the future of the country.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
US SEC summons Gautam Adani, nephew Sagar in bribery case
New York (PTI): Adani group founder and chairman Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar have been summoned to explain their stand on the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) allegation of paying USD 265 million (Rs 2,200 crore) in bribes to secure lucrative solar power contracts.
Summons have been sent to Adani's Shantivan Farm residence in Ahmedabad and his nephew Sagar's Bodakdev residence in the same city for a reply to SEC within 21 days.
"Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it)...you must serve on the plaintiff (SEC) an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure," said a November 21 notice sent through the New York Eastern District Court.
"If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court," it added.
Gautam Adani, 62, and seven other defendants, including his nephew Sagar, who is a director at the group's renewable energy unit Adani Green Energy Ltd, allegedly agreed to pay about USD 265 million in bribes to Indian government officials between approximately 2020 and 2024 to obtain lucrative solar energy supply contracts on terms that expected to yield USD 2 billion of profit over 20 years, according to an indictment unsealed in a New York court on Wednesday.
Separate from the indictment brought by the US Department of Justice, the US SEC has also charged the two and Cyril Cabanes, an executive of Azure Power Global, for "conduct arising out of a massive bribery scheme".
The ports-to-energy conglomerate has denied the allegations and said it will seek all possible legal resources.
"The Adani Group has always upheld and is steadfastly committed to maintaining the highest standards of governance, transparency and regulatory compliance across all jurisdictions of its operations. We assure our stakeholders, partners and employees that we are a law-abiding organisation fully compliant with all laws."
An indictment in the US is basically a formal written allegation originating with a prosecutor and issued by a grand jury against a party charged with a crime. A person indicted is given formal notice to reply.
That person or persons can then hire a defence lawyer to defend.
Prosecutors said the investigation started in 2022 and found the inquiry obstructed.
They also allege that the Adani Group raised USD 2 billion in loans and bonds, including from US firms, on the backs of false and misleading statements related to the firm's anti-bribery practices and policies, as well as reports of the bribery probe.
"As alleged, the defendants orchestrated an elaborate scheme to bribe Indian government officials to secure contracts worth billions of dollars and... lied about the bribery scheme as they sought to raise capital from U.S. and international investors," US Attorney Breon Peace said in a statement announcing the charges on Wednesday.
"My office is committed to rooting out corruption in the international marketplace and protecting investors from those who seek to enrich themselves at the expense of the integrity of our financial markets."
