Reopening of Schools: Is the State Government’s move prudent?
Even as Karnataka is seeing a rapid increase in the number of coronavirus cases, the state government has taken a major step with respect to reopening of schools, the second major move after its announcement to conduct SSLC examinations. According to government sources, the state government has prepared a draft timetable to reopen schools in a phased manner from July 1. This decision has elicited widespread reactions, from those supporting and opposing the move. Experts, including those in the health sector, have not adopted a clear stance on this. By relaxing the restrictions on running malls, hotels, and public buses to operate, it is obvious that the state government is expecting the people to take onus on their health and take precautionary measures. It would be difficult, however, to expect the same sense of responsibility and awareness among school children to impose self-regulation and restrict their movements.
Initially, when the Corona virus had just entered the country and people hardly had any information or awareness about the virus, it was the government that created fear psychosis in the minds of the public. The government made the lives of the common man hell by imposing a complete lockdown when the number of those infected was in single digit. Today, when the number has increased manifold, the government has no choice but to relax the lockdown restrictions. It is possible that the restrictions would be completely relaxed in July, but it doesn’t mean that everything will be hunky dory thereafter. It only means increased responsibility on the people and society at large.
The government while allowing schools to reopen may ask them to take precautionary measures and follow a set of restrictions. But whether these restrictions can be implemented in schools is the moot point. The government’s move has created anxiety among a majority of parents. It’s difficult for parents to not send their children to school once it reopens. In this age of competition, parents won’t be prepared to put the future of their children in jeopardy. At the same time, they would be apprehensive about the health of their children as it will be difficult for them to completely trust the schools about protecting their children against the virus.
This move has also raised several pertinent questions. The state has imposed restrictions on the number of passengers in buses. Has it imposed or can it impose similar restrictions on schools to allow only a certain number of children? Many schools seat an average of five children on a single bench. In the background of Corona and social distancing, this number has to be reduced to about three children who can be seated on a bench. It doesn’t seem practical at this point to expect schools to be prepared to do so. Let’s assume that schools prepare to follow social distancing. What then happens if all children cannot be admitted to schools due to this factor? To comply with the regulations, private schools would then be forced to increase the fees and probably admit only those children who can pay donations. This could also lead to widespread corruption.
School transportation is another issue altogether which the government cannot claim ignorance of. Regardless of the laws of transportation, children are crammed into vans and transported to schools. Can schools ensure that only one child occupies a seat and doesn’t share his seat with others? Is it even practical to have such an expectation? As it is, transportation fee is a huge burden on parents. On the pretext of social distancing, if school vans reduce the number of students, parents would be forced to pay double the fee to school managements to accommodate their children.
Keeping aside all these issues, let’s look at the basic facilities in schools. There are many schools that don’t even provide proper toilets or drinking water facilities to children, both in urban and rural areas. The state of government schools in rural areas, especially, is pathetic and it would be beyond the capacity of such schools to provide masks or hand sanitizers to students . If parents choose not to send their children to such government schools, their children would be deprived of education.
We must also remember that the month of July is the beginning of the rainy season during which diseases such as malaria, dengue, and other diseases spread. In the midst of changing weather conditions and with the threat of Corona virus looming large, children falling sick would lead to anxiety among parents. And even if one child is infected with the Corona virus, it will have an impact on the entire school. In such a situation, the entire class to which the child belongs must be tested and quarantined. What would then be the impact of all this on children’s education? School education is not only about books; it includes play, sport, cultural events, and other creative activities and explorations that make it difficult for schools and children to adhere to social distancing.
The state government should therefore answer why the stringent measures imposed on malls, buses, supermarkets are not applicable to schools. If they are applicable to schools, the government should make it clear how it is going to address the issues listed above. It is alleged that the state government has taken the hasty decision to reopen schools buckling under pressure from institutions that have made education a commercial enterprise. These allegations cannot be dismissed as totally false. When the entire country could be shut down for a few months, what’s the worst that can happen if schools reopen a few months late? Given the challenges, it is inevitable for schools to remain shut for at least two months. Before permitting schools to reopen, the government should first confirm that schools have taken all precautionary measures and should not hesitate to act against schools that flout the norms. Until such time, the government should immediately withdraw any move to reopen schools on July 1st and take a decision only after consulting experts.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Trouble ‘Miyas’ everywhere only then they will leave Assam: Himanta Biswa Sarma
Says “Himanta Biswa Sarma, BJP are openly against them, we are saying it openly
New Delhi: Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Tuesday said that four to five lakh “Miya voters” would be removed from the electoral rolls in the state once the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists is carried out. He also made a series of controversial remarks openly targeting the Miya community, a term commonly used in Assam in a derogatory sense to refer to Bengali-speaking Muslims.
Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of an official programme in Digboi in Tinsukia district, Sarma said it was his responsibility to create difficulties for the Miya community and claimed that both he and the BJP were “directly against Miyas”.
“Four to five lakh Miya votes will have to be deleted in Assam when the SIR happens,” Sarma said, adding that such voters “should ideally not be allowed to vote in Assam, but in Bangladesh”. He asserted that the government was ensuring that they would not be able to vote in the state.
The chief minister was responding to questions about notices issued to thousands of Bengali-speaking Muslims during the claims and objections phase of the ongoing Special Revision (SR) of electoral rolls in Assam. While the Election Commission is conducting SIR exercises in 12 states and Union Territories, Assam is currently undergoing an SR, which is usually meant for routine updates.
Calling the current SR “preliminary”, Sarma said that a full-fledged SIR in Assam would lead to large-scale deletion of Miya voters. He said he was unconcerned about criticism from opposition parties over the issue.
“Let the Congress abuse me as much as they want. My job is to make the Miya people suffer,” Sarma said. He claimed that complaints filed against members of the community were done on his instructions and that he had encouraged BJP workers to keep filing complaints.
“I have told people wherever possible they should fill Form 7 so that they have to run around a little and are troubled,” he said, adding that such actions were meant to send a message that “the Assamese people are still living”.
In remarks that drew further outrage, Sarma urged people to trouble members of the Miya community in everyday life, claiming that “only if they face troubles will they leave Assam”. He also accused the media of sympathising with the community and warned journalists against such coverage.
“So you all should also trouble, and you should not do news that sympathise with them. There will be love jihad in your own house.” He said.
The comments triggered reactions from opposition leaders. Raijor Dal president and MLA Akhil Gogoi said the people of Assam had not elected Sarma to keep one community under constant pressure. Congress leader Aman Wadud accused the chief minister of rendering the Constitution meaningless in the state, saying his remarks showed a complete disregard for constitutional values.
According to the draft electoral rolls published on December 27, Assam currently has 2.51 crore voters. Election officials said 4.78 lakh names were marked as deceased, 5.23 lakh as having shifted, and 53,619 duplicate entries were removed during the revision process. Authorities also claimed that verification had been completed for over 61 lakh households.
On January 25, six opposition parties the Congress, Raijor Dal, Assam Jatiya Parishad, CPI, CPI(M) and CPI(M-L) submitted a memorandum to the state’s chief electoral officer. They alleged widespread legal violations, political interference and selective targeting of genuine voters during the SR exercise, describing it as arbitrary, unlawful and unconstitutional.
