Reservation for upper castes; their silence & confusion of dalits
Reservation is not a low hanging fruit for the exploited in this country. It has a history of centuries of fighting for this, and the sacrifice people like Ambedkar had to make for this to materialize. Now even with reservation, the dalits and other lower castes are still in miserable state in India, one can only imagine what would have been their fate if reservation had not been provided.
Even when the country became free, the power would have merely remained in the hands of upper castes. Reservation was made part of the constitution owing to foresightedness and sense of social justice of Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wodeyar and Shahu Maharaj, and constant fight staged by the lower castes.
Ironically, the 10% reservation that has been incorporated into legal framework of the country, to the upper caste does not have any background as such. No government has come forward to give a true picture of upper caste or Brahmin youths and the state of penury they have been living in, like the Sachar report spoke about the miserable condition that Muslims are living in this country.
In the recent past, even Mayawati had offered reservation to upper caste Brahmins and she was joined by many Congress senior leaders as well. But these promises did not have any other reason. No government has the guts to show the true story of poverty faced by the people of the country. Her assurance to upper caste youths is nothing more than a political farce played against them.
In the recent past, many people were denied food grains because they didn’t have Aadhar card. This had created a situation of the poor being forced to die of starvation in the country. Not a single dead person among these, belonged to upper caste. All those who died belong to lower castes. When one considers the data of malnutrition, it reveals that lower caste, shudra, muslims and others are in majority.
Though it has been more than 50 years, the people from this communities are not able to make a headway into education sector. For that matter, other castes have not been able to tread even half the distance traded by people from other castes did in job sector.
All those people who have been represented in the union cabinet are from upper caste. They have strong political presence. So when the government proposes to offer 10% reservation to the upper caste, what would be the basis and what is the need for a hurried passing of the bill? This must be the only bill in the history of this country that was passed without even much deliberation in both houses in four days and even reached the President’s table for his concurrence.
The whole purpose of this 10% reservation bill is to turn the aim of reservation offered by Ambedkar, upside down. With this bill, the government has created an impression in people’s mind that reservation is for economic upliftment. This 10% may not help the upper caste much, but will deal a massive blow to other marginalized communities which would move into regression mode.
As per a report submitted by Centre for Monitoring Economy, the job market in India is very discouraging. The rate of unemployment by December 2018 was at 7.4% which is the highest in the last 15 months. Secondly, about 1.1 crore people who have lost jobs in 2017-18 have been added to this number. Rural distress with agrarian crisis is the worse, with people losing about 82% jobs and most of this brunt is borne by women.
According to another report brought out by ILO or International Labour Organisation, about 80% of the jobs in India are considered to be tentative with no job security. Only 20% of the employees are on regular payrolls and another 40% are earing way lesser than the norm. Recruitment for vacancies within the government are at snail’s pace. More than one third of the backlogs that lie vacant belong to reserved category. Most of the unorganized and informal sector that created many jobs are worst hit by GST and demonetization and are yet to emerge from the shock.
At a time like this, the government threw caution to wind where the Supreme Court had clearly said the overall reservation should not cross 50%. The government has announced this 10% reservation with the hope of finding more allies for elections and increase its voteshare. This may also help the government find some lost ground in 5 hindi belt states, back.
This economic reservation must be the biggest of all jumlas that is harmful to the maximum extent too to the country. People from lower castes and economic background, should raise their voice against this. Not just the economically poor, but the socially marginalized communities must come together to oppose this. Irony is all those organisations that would dissent against such proposals have maintained strategic silence. The exploited community is confused about the next move since representing leaders like Mayawati and Paswan are in support of this. Their move seems more dangerous at the moment, than Modi’s strategies are to the country.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Speaker rules out discussion on Guv''s conduct amid K''taka Assembly standoff
Bengaluru (PTI): In an effort to end the logjam over the Governor's address that has stalled proceedings for the past week, Karnataka Assembly Speaker U T Khader on Wednesday ruled that legislators should not discuss Thaawarchand Gehlot or his conduct in the house, saying such debates send the wrong message to the public.
The House has witnessed repeated disruptions and adjournments since the session began on January 22 over the issue of the governor's conduct.
During his address to the joint sitting of the Karnataka legislature on January 22, Gehlot read out only three sentences from the 122-paragraph speech prepared by the state government.
The speech included criticism of the Centre for replacing the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajivika Mission (Gramin) (VB-G RAM G), portions of which the governor declined to read.
Concluding his address in about two minutes, the governor left the house, triggering a commotion as Congress legislators attempted to gherao him and raised slogans.
While the opposition BJP accused the ruling Congress and its ministers of "insulting" the governor and demanded action, the treasury benches countered by claiming the governor had "insulted the National Anthem by leaving before it was played."
The house again witnessed heated arguments on the issue earlier in the day, leading to adjournment.
During the interruption, Khader held a meeting with ministers and opposition members to resolve the impasse.
When proceedings resumed, the speaker delivered his ruling.
Referring to the events of January 22 and the subsequent debate, Khader said the conduct and discussions had conveyed the wrong message to the public.
"Our conduct as members of this House and the opinions expressed must be in good taste and in accordance with constitutional provisions. They must uphold the dignity of the House and its members. We must introspect in this direction," he said.
He stressed the need for caution to ensure that such incidents are not repeated in the future.
"Let us end this matter here, continue the discussion on the motion of thanks to the governor, and refrain from discussing the governor or his conduct in this house," the speaker said.
Leader of the Opposition R Ashoka said the house should express regret over what he termed an "insult" to the governor.
Responding, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said the situation would not have arisen had the governor read out the entire address.
"Asking the house to express regret is not appropriate. Why did the governor leave even before the National Anthem was played," Siddaramaiah asked.
BJP MLA S Suresh Kumar reminded Siddaramaiah that as Leader of the Opposition in 2011, he had asked then Governor Hansraj Bhardwaj to curtail his address.
Bhardwaj had subsequently placed the address on the table of the house, requesting members to treat it as read.
Siddaramaiah said the situation in January 2011 was different from the present one.
The debate grew intense, leading to another adjournment of the house.
