The Nobel Prize needs to regain its credibility
The Nobel Prize, deemed as the most prestigious honour across the globe, has been mired in controversies time and again. Despite its significant cause of identifying the most outstanding personalities whose contribution has been significant to the betterment of the world, the global forces that work behind this committee have always been questioned by people. Many scholars have even rejected this honour. There is definitely some amount of truth in the allegation of Nobel Prize being under the control of imperialist forces. There were roaring discussions when the prize was given to Aung San Suu Kyi and Barack Obama.
The fact that Mahatma Gandhi was denied the Nobel, is a lacunae for the prize itself. Yet, there is no question about the credibility of Nobel to a large extent. This time again, the Nobel Prize is wallowing in controversy. Not for having bestowed the award on someone, but because the award will NOT be given away to any recipient this year. The Swedish origin Academy has declared that the award will not be given in 2018 for literature. And as a compensatory measure, two people will be honoured in 2019 for the same category. In the past, Nobel Prize has been stalled on seven occasions and five times the ceremony has been postponed. But this time around, the reasons are different and a lot concerning too. This issue that is internal to the Academy, has created a rift among its members. The giving away of the award has been stopped over allegations of sexual harassment allegedly done by the spouse of a lady member. Protesting this, eight members among the 18 member committee have submitted their resignation to the committee. In order to regain the credibility of the Nobel Academy, the award ceremony too has been postponed, says the committee.
There are discussions among prestigious circles about the approach to the topic and the decision that has followed. Why should Academy be held responsible for the members and their family’s personal issues? In 1914 when the world was reeling under the first world war the prize was stalled. In 1915, the prize ceremony was postponed again and it was given to French writer Romain Rolland in 1916. The same thing repeated in 1918 too. Swiss writer Carl Spitteler was selected for the award, but the ceremony was postponed in 1919. It could have been the committee’s decision to award one of their own countrymen at a time when the war ended and people were finally happy. In 1935, academy didn’t honour anyone. And the process of selection itself was postponed in 1936 owing to the fact that no persons could reach the parameters fixed by Alfred Nobel, as per the committee. Eugene O`Neill was honoured with the award in 1936. The prize ceremony was postponed again during the second world war in 1940 and 1943. Danish writer Johannes Jensen was accorded with the award in 1945, after the award was postponed for a year in 1944.
Chili poet Gabriela Mistral was awarded with Nobel Prize in 1945. The committee postponed the award for literature since it was unable to find a befitting recipient in 1949. However, William Faulkner was awarded with this honour in 1950, for the year 1949. From then on, the award wasn’t given a miss even a single year. This is the only year in the recent history that the award has been postponed again. There could have been many other reasons for this. And had the academy wished to postpone the award, a reason like the genocide in Syria (other than someone’s inappropriateness) could have sent a strong message to those strong nations that dictate the world. The committee opposing mass murders of the Rohingyas could have saved the world some compassion and an opportunity to introspect. The world is moving towards waging a third world war, with every passing day. Fascist forces are taking over nations and media is losing its freedom. Had the academy responded to this, and stalled the award it could have helped the world. But then, a reason as given by the academy, has only reduced the whole thing to a matter of internal bickering of the members. This has shrunk the dignity of the academy and the selection committee.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
RSS man's defamation case against Rahul: Key witness unavailable, hearing adjourned to Dec 20
Thane (PTI): A court in Bhiwandi in Thane district on Saturday adjourned the hearing in the criminal defamation case filed against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi by a Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) worker to December 20 due to non-availability of a crucial prosecution witness.
Advocate Narayan Iyer, counsel for Rahul Gandhi, confirmed the adjournment, stating that the witness, Ashok Saykar, currently Deputy Superintendent of Police in Barshi in Solapur, could not remain present due to personal reasons.
Saykar's evidence is now likely to be recorded on December 29.
His testimony is considered key because he, as police sub inspector in 2014, conducted the preliminary inquiry into the private defamation matter under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
It was on the basis of Saykar's submitted report that the court subsequently issued process (summons) against Rahul Gandhi under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
The criminal defamation case was filed by local RSS worker Rajesh Kunte following a speech given by Rahul Gandhi at an election rally near Bhiwandi on March 6, 2014.
The case stems from the Congress leader's alleged statement that "the RSS people killed (Mahatma) Gandhi."
The matter is being heard by Bhiwandi Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, P M Kolse.
The hearing had previously been adjourned on November 15 after the complainant's counsel, Advocate Prabodh Jaywant, moved an application seeking permission to examine Saykar, who had submitted the probe report to the court.
The matter was originally scheduled for November 29 but was deferred to December 6 after Rahul Gandhi's legal team sought an adjournment citing their non-availability. The proceedings will now resume on December 20.
