The process of killing dissent, purchasing voices
One of the main tasks that the corporate world did before bringing Modi to the chair of PM, is to kill or buy the media and human rights activists. The process of muzzling the media started with the finishing of ‘Tehelka’ paper. This paper has started a new discourse and order in journalism by conducting sting operation to expose corruption in the defense sector during the tenure of NDA government led by former PM Atal Bihari Vajapayee. The paper had written extensively about Gujarat genocide to ensure the voice of the victims was heard in the international arena.
Hence when it was decided that PM Narendra Modi had to be catapulted to the chair he is sitting in, the first steps that were taken were to ensure Tehelka and the likes were finished rather unceremoniously. Because Tarun Tejpal was at the heights of his fame during that time. Corporate forces worked well enough to ensure he was brought down well in time using his own weaknesses. Tejpal was trapped in sexual harassment charges and the trustworthiness brand Tehelka had created, came down with a massive thud. The progressives were forced to take a stand against Tehelka, which they had supported to grow. A paper that could have made it voice heard against Modi in the run up to the elections, was razed to dust. All the brilliant journalists who had associated with Tehelka had to disperse to join social media or new technology platforms.
This run to raze the voices has only increased since the time Modi assumed power. The government targeted the NGOs and environmentalists and gave them the tag of ‘anti-nationals’. Even NGOs with international reputation such as Green Peace had to suffer during this time. Modi and his cronies knew the opposition party within the parliament is weak, and hence their real opponents are environmentalists, human rights activists, media and NGOs along with anybody who’d raise voice against the government. Hence attempts were kept consistently on to muzzle the voices that differed.
Rajdeep Sardesai and his wife Sagarika Ghosh were forced to resign from CNN-IBN for having kept up their narrative against the violence unleashed by Sangh Parivar. Siddharth Varadarajan also had to leave The Hindu under similar circumstances. IT forces were unleashed against NDTV. Teesta Setalvad was chased which legal cases perched on top of her to no end. Some papers were killed, and some part of the media was bought over. All the journalists who were thus displaced, had to go with internet or new media platforms using social media.
Continuing its hunting of the media persons, government began to file cases against journalists on personal capacity too. Two senior journalists were forced to quit ABP Hindi channel for having filed a contradictory report against the Modi govermment’s schemes. Their only crime was to expose the publicity hungry mentality of Modi, and the total fakeness of the claims on progress made by the government. A government usually issues a rejoinder or a clarification, explaining the reality from its side. Modi has many ways of putting out his reality if he wishes to. The whole thing smells rotten when a govt sets out to muzzle the contradictory voices. This could mean there is a bit of reality in what the critics are saying. The dismissal of ABP journalists is speaking volumes of truth. The corporate world seems to think by threatening the journalists, one can keep away real news from people and thus protect Modi’s image.
At the same time, there is also an indirect attempt on shutting the voice that is insisting on judicial probe of Justice Loya’s death. Justice Loya was hearing the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case. The family had believed Loya died under natural circumstances. But the allegations of Loya being killed for having rejected favours from Amit Shah to make the verdict favourable to him. This has caused huge embarrassment to Amit Shah. Not only the Shah gang has been successful in shutting this topic out, but now they are also busy trying to arm twist the people who brought this fact to light.
Lawyer Satish Uke, the social activist who brought the Loya case out, has now been arrested in a case that was filed 17 years ago. The same lawyer had filed a case against Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis in Maharashtra some time ago. Phadnavis was issued a notice against this. And now instead of clarifying its role, the government has arrested the person who filed this case. If this continues, very soon there will be a day when even opposition leaders may be unable to speak against the government. Isn’t this enough to know India is already facing undeclared emergency?
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
VHP warns of statewide stir in Karnataka against move to ease cattle transport law
Udupi (Karnataka) (PTI): The VHP on Saturday demanded the immediate withdrawal of a proposed amendment to the Karnataka Prevention of Slaughter and Preservation of Cattle Act, 2020, accusing the state government of weakening a law that has deterred illegal cattle transport.
The organisation's Go Raksha Wing, Karnataka South, has also announced district-level protests on December 8.
According to officials, the existing law mandates a bank guarantee for securing the release of vehicles seized for alleged illegal cattle transportation.
On December 4, the state Cabinet proposed an amendment enabling the release of such vehicles on an indemnity bond instead.
Addressing reporters in Udupi, VHP leader and Prantha Goraksha Pramukh Sunil K R, said the government's move amounted to "sympathy for cattle lifters" and claimed that it was part of broader actions "targeting Hindus".
He argued that the law in its current form is stringent and has played a crucial role in reducing incidents of illegal cattle transport and theft.
Under the Act, vehicles involved in offences can be surrendered and, upon conviction, permanently seized by authorities. "Diluting these provisions will embolden offenders," Sunil said.
The VHP leader warned that easing the process of vehicle release would not only encourage violators but also result in rising cruelty against cattle.
Sunil further claimed that the strict enforcement of the 2020 law had brought down cases of cattle-related offences significantly. Rolling back these provisions, he said, could reverse those gains and would lead to an increase in illegal transport.
He reiterated that the government must reconsider its decision and preserve the integrity of the existing law.
