When questioning government becomes Un-Indian
Should one not question the government if it fails to protect the nation’s borders? Is it unpatriotic to ask why foreign troops are occupying Indian land or attacking our soldiers? And more importantly, who decides what makes someone a “true Indian”?
These uncomfortable questions have returned to the forefront after a recent observation by the Supreme Court. In a case involving Rahul Gandhi, the Court remarked that “a true Indian would not make such a statement.” This was in reference to Gandhi’s past remarks questioning the central government’s silence over the deadly Galwan clash at the China border, an incident where Chinese troops had reportedly occupied over 2,000 square kilometres of Indian territory and launched a brutal assault on Indian soldiers.
Gandhi had raised these concerns during the 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra and even earlier in Parliament. He questioned the government’s handling of the border situation a subject that had already sparked heated debate in the House. A defamation case was filed against him for these remarks. In response, Rahul Gandhi approached the Supreme Court, challenging the summons issued by a Lucknow court. The Allahabad High Court had earlier stayed the summons.
While the Supreme Court has now stayed the proceedings, it did not hold back from making a remark that has since sparked outrage. Its comment that “a true Indian would not say such a thing” has added a dangerous layer to the ongoing national conversation. Already, in the name of citizenship documents, we’ve seen people being made to prove their identity, from ration shops to the Election Commission. Now, the highest court of the country has indirectly introduced a new filter: what one must or must not say to be considered “truly Indian.”
This is alarming.
Ironically, the same Supreme Court has on multiple occasions defended the right to free speech. Just this March, it quashed an FIR against Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi for posting a poem on Facebook, asserting the need to protect freedom of expression. The Court has also warned against curbing dissent in the name of national security. It has consistently said that hate speech should not be allowed under the guise of free speech. But in this case, the Court seems to have not only questioned Rahul Gandhi’s right to speak, it has gone a step further to question his very Indianness.
Rahul Gandhi is not just any citizen. He is a democratically elected Member of Parliament. And yet, simply for questioning the government, he faced the disqualification. When Parliament refuses to allow serious discussion on issues like border security, where else can opposition leaders take their concerns, if not to the people? If even that space is now being policed, then democracy itself is in danger.
When our soldiers are killed, when our land is occupied, is it not the duty of every Indian to question the government? And if an elected leader does just that, asks questions, demands answers, and is told that such statements make him less of an Indian, then we must ask: who gets to decide what being Indian means?
The judiciary, which is expected to uphold the Constitution and protect dissent, must not blur the lines between patriotism and blind loyalty. Otherwise, we risk normalising a mindset where questioning those in power becomes a crime, and silence is rewarded.
Every time something happens along the Pakistan border, even something minor, BJP leaders, including the Prime Minister, don’t hold back from making statements. But when Chinese troops invade our land and harm our soldiers, opposition leaders are told to keep quiet. And now, even the Supreme Court appears to echo that silence.
Time and again, when the opposition asks hard questions on national security, the response is that such statements “lower the morale of our soldiers.” But when a government hides its own failures behind our soldiers’ sacrifices, who else if not opposition leaders are supposed to raise their voice?
This isn’t new. Back in the 1960s, when China launched an attack on India, the then Prime Minister Nehru was widely criticised and held responsible for the deaths of Indian soldiers. Even when the slogan “Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai” was being promoted, China betrayed India. Hundreds of our soldiers died. The country lost precious territory. The BJP still blames Nehru for that defeat. Books like Himalayan Blunder, written by military officers, questioned leadership decisions at the time. Yet, no one called them “anti-national” or questioned their Indianness.
When attacks like Pulwama happen, or fighter jets crash during high-stakes operations like Operation Sindhoor, the ruling party wraps itself in the flag and avoids all accountability. But when Rahul Gandhi raises his voice about Chinese aggression, he is told even by the Supreme Court that a “true Indian” would not speak this way.
What does this say about the current state of our democracy?
It says that authoritarianism is no longer limited to political circles. It is now creeping into institutions that are supposed to check power, not protect it. When leaders are told what not to say, when dissent is painted as betrayal, and when the definition of an Indian is narrowed to suit political convenience, we have a crisis on our hands.
In a democracy, the job of the opposition is not to clap for the government, but to question it. Especially when soldiers die, and land is lost.
And if that act of questioning now makes someone less Indian, then perhaps it’s not Rahul Gandhi we should be worried about, it’s the very idea of India we need to protect.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Texas halts H-1B visas at state universities, agencies; to affect Indians
Houston (US) (PTI): Texas Governor Greg Abbott has ordered state agencies and public universities to immediately halt new H-1B visa petitions, tightening hiring rules at taxpayer-funded institutions, a step likely to impact Indian professionals.
The freeze will remain in effect through May 2027.
The directive issued on Tuesday said that the state agencies and public universities must stop filing new petitions unless they receive written approval from the Texas Workforce Commission.
The governor's order, in a red state that is home to thousands of H-1B visa holders, comes as the Trump administration has initiated steps to reshape the visa programme.
“In light of recent reports of abuse in the federal H-1B visa programme, and amid the federal government’s ongoing review of that programme to ensure American jobs are going to American workers, I am directing all state agencies to immediately freeze new H-1B visa petitions as outlined in this letter,” Abbot said.
Institutions must also report on H-1B usage, including numbers, job roles, countries of origin, and visa expiry dates, the letter said.
US President Donald Trump on September 19 last year signed a proclamation ‘Restriction on entry of certain non-immigrant workers’ that restricted the entry into the US of those workers whose H-1B petitions are not accompanied or supplemented by a payment of USD 1,00,000.
The H1-B visa fee of USD 1,00,000 would be applicable only to new applicants, i.e. all new H-1B visa petitions submitted after September 21, including those for the FY2026 lottery.
Indians make up an estimated 71 per cent of all approved H-1B applications in recent years, according to US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), with China in the second spot. The major fields include technology, engineering, medicine, and research.
Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) is the second-highest beneficiary with 5,505 approved H-1B visas in 2025, after Amazon (10,044 workers on H-1B visas), according to the USCIS. Other top beneficiaries include Microsoft (5,189), Meta (5,123), Apple (4,202), Google (4,181), Deloitte (2,353), Infosys (2,004), Wipro (1,523) and Tech Mahindra Americas (951).
Texas public universities employ hundreds of foreign faculty and researchers, many from India, across engineering, healthcare, and technology fields.
Date from Open Doors -- a comprehensive information resource on international students and scholars studying or teaching at higher education institutions in the US -- for 2022-2023 showed 2,70,000 students from India embarked on graduate and undergraduate degrees in US universities, accounting for 25 per cent of the international student population in the US and 1.5 per cent of the total student population.
Indian students infuse roughly USD 10 billion annually into universities and related businesses across the country through tuition and other expenses – while also creating around 93,000 jobs, according to the Open Doors data.
Analysts warn the freeze could slow recruitment of highly skilled professionals, affecting academic research and innovation.
Supporters say the directive protects local jobs, while critics caution it could weaken Texas’ competitiveness in higher education and research.
The order comes amid broader debate in the US over skilled immigration and state-level interventions in federal programmes.
H-1B visas allow US companies to hire technically-skilled professionals that are not easily available in America. Initially granted for three years, these can be extended for another three years.
In September 2025, Trump had also signed an executive order ‘The Gold Card’, aimed at setting up a new visa pathway for those committed to supporting the United States; with individuals who can pay USD 1 million to the US Treasury, or USD 2 million if a corporation is sponsoring them, to get access to expedited visa treatment and a path to a Green Card.
