Securing Millions Abroad: Why India Avoids Taking Sides in War
A country's Supreme Leader is killed. His infant granddaughter is dead. A girls' school is bombed, killing 150 people. Hospitals are destroyed. And the world's largest democracy — India — is watching all of this in complete silence. No condolence. No condemnation. Just a cold, careful, calculated silence. Does that not disturb you?
On February 28, America and Israel launched devastating missile strikes deep inside Iran. The very first attack killed Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, along with five of his own family members, including a tiny baby granddaughter, and his closest advisors. Think about that for a moment. An entire family wiped out in seconds. Then came more horror. A girls' primary school in the city of Minab was hit, killing nearly 150 innocent people, mostly children, and injuring about 100 more. On March 1, hospitals in Tehran were damaged, including Gandhi Hospital — a hospital named after our own Mahatma Gandhi. The head of the World Health Organization called these attacks "deeply concerning."
And what did India say? External Affairs Minister Jaishankar did speak to Iran's Foreign Minister on the same day. But in all official statements, there was no condolence message. No mention of the children killed in schools. No word about the hospitals destroyed. Just a general line saying India is "deeply concerned about recent developments." That is it. Later, on March 3, another statement came expressing "grave anxiety." But still, nothing specific. Nothing human.
This has shocked many people, including India's own former diplomats. One former Ambassador with deep experience in international law gave a chilling warning. He said that if countries do not stand up against the growing practice of killing leaders of independent nations, they themselves could be "next in line." Think about that. If today it is Iran's leader, tomorrow it could be anyone.
Opposition parties have slammed the Modi government hard. They are asking — is this the same India that always stood for peace, sovereignty, and international law? They point out that India has responded more strongly in the past. In January 2020, when America killed Iran's top General Qasem Soleimani, India had at least called the situation "alarming." The Ministry of External Affairs had acknowledged that a senior Iranian leader was killed and stressed the importance of peace in the region. Iran's Foreign Minister even visited New Delhi that year and openly criticised President Trump during the Raisina Dialogue.
Again in June 2025, when America attacked Iran's nuclear sites, Prime Minister Modi himself called Iran's President within hours and expressed "deep concern." India later joined SCO and BRICS statements criticising the strikes. During that crisis, Iran even made a special exception for India, reopening its airspace only for Indian flights so that hundreds of Indians could return home safely. Iran helped us. And now, when Iran is bleeding, India is looking the other way.
So why this silence? Former Ambassador to Iran, Rakesh Sood, explained to The HINDU , that today's global politics is extremely complex, India's ties with Iran have weakened over the years, and Khamenei's past remarks about India had created bitterness. But beyond that, there are five deeper reasons.
First, India's bond with Israel has become very strong. Modi was the first Indian PM to visit Israel in 2017. After his recent speech in the Israeli Parliament saying India stands "firmly and fully" with Israel, the shift became clear. After the war began, Modi called Netanyahu and Gulf leaders but did not call Iran's President. Netanyahu even thanked Modi publicly. India clearly does not want to upset Israel.
Second, India-Iran trade has collapsed. Due to American sanctions, India stopped buying Iranian oil in 2018. Trade crashed from 17 billion dollars to barely 1.68 billion. Even the Chabahar port that India built is now in danger. India has already paid its full 120 million dollars and quietly pulled out most staff. Israeli missiles have even struck the Chabahar airport area.
Third, Khamenei had personally angered India by criticising its Kashmir policy in 2017, opposing Article 370's removal in 2019, and calling the Delhi riots a "massacre of Muslims" in 2020. This bitterness made India unwilling to mourn his death publicly.
Fourth, India does not want to upset its Gulf friends, especially the UAE and Saudi Arabia. A new defence partnership with the UAE was signed just this January. Since Iran has attacked facilities in these countries, India cannot be seen supporting Iran.
Fifth, India desperately needs America right now. A fresh trade deal was signed in February 2026. America has included India in its Pax Silica technology supply chain. With Trump threatening sanctions on anyone engaging with Iran, India simply cannot risk angering Washington.
But this silence has a price. India hosts the BRICS summit this year — a group that includes both Iran and the UAE. If India stays quiet too long, its reputation as a fair and independent voice will be damaged forever.
Silence is also a choice. And sometimes, silence speaks louder than words.
(Girish Linganna is an award-winning science communicator and a Defence, Aerospace & Geopolitical Analyst. He is the Managing Director of ADD Engineering Components India Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of ADD Engineering GmbH, Germany.)
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or position of the publication, its editors, or its management. The publication is not responsible for the accuracy of any information, statements, or opinions presented in this piece.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
IPL final shifted for bigger stadium, not ticket issue: Shivakumar
Bengaluru (PTI): Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar on Wednesday rubbished allegations that the IPL final venue was shifted from Bengaluru to Ahmedabad due to the distribution of tickets to MLAs.
Speaking to reporters, Shivakumar said the reason for the shift could be the availability of a larger stadium in Ahmedabad.
“Ahmedabad has a large stadium and can accommodate more spectators. That must be the reason the IPL final was shifted there. There is no connection between ticket distribution to MLAs and the venue change,” he said.
When asked about reports linking the venue shift to MLAs demanding tickets, he quipped, “In some places, 50 per cent of tickets are reserved.”
When reporters said the BCCI had indicated that the decision was linked to ticket issues, he responded, “Let them make such statements. I will respond appropriately.”
Bengaluru was originally expected to host the final as the Royal Challengers Bengaluru were the defending champions.
Ahmedabad will host the IPL final for a second successive season on May 31, the BCCI announced earlier in the day, while allotting Qualifier 1 to Dharamsala and two other playoff games to New Chandigarh.
The board, however, said the final venue was shifted “owing to certain requirements from the local association and authorities that were beyond the scope of BCCI’s established guidelines and protocols.”
Shivakumar declined to comment on the revocation of the suspension of Muslim leaders in Davanagere, saying it was a party decision.
Regarding the removal of MLC Naseer Ahmed as CM Siddaramaiah’s political secretary, he said the chief minister had already spoken on the matter.
“The CM has his own information. Party office-bearers have provided guidance. He was given certain responsibilities, which he did not handle properly, which is why he was removed,” Shivakumar said.
On MLC Abdul Jabbar, who resigned as the state Congress minority cell chief and was later expelled from the party, he said Jabbar had submitted his resignation, which the party accepted.
The Congress in Karnataka faced internal dissent in April when several Muslim leaders objected to the party fielding Samarth Shamanur as its candidate for the recently held Davanagere South Assembly bypoll.
They demanded that a Muslim candidate be fielded, citing the constituency’s substantial Muslim population. The party subsequently took disciplinary action against three leaders, including Jabbar and MLC Ahmed.
When asked about his and the CM’s visit to Delhi, he said, “We will go when the high command calls us. It is not appropriate to go without being called.”
On Congress supporting TVK in Tamil Nadu, Shivakumar said the decision was taken to keep the "BJP out of power and strengthen secular forces." Elections to the 234 Assembly constituencies were held on April 23, and the results were announced on May 4.
The Congress party, a long-time ally of the DMK, announced its support for TVK to form a government in Tamil Nadu and severed ties with the Dravidian major.
The incumbent DMK was trounced by the fledgling Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam, led by Vijay, who secured 108 seats. “Despite pressure from the AIADMK and BJP, TVK did not align with them. Our party has taken this decision in the interest of secular forces and the welfare of Tamil Nadu,” Shivakumar said.
