The prices of petrol and diesel have reached unprecedented levels, leading to massive discontent and protests organised by the opposition. Petrol in Delhi has crossed Rs 80 per litre and diesel Rs 72 per litre. In most other cities, the prices have reached higher levels, depending on the rates of VAT imposed by state governments.
Spokespersons of the Narendra Modi government are pleading helplessness over the situation, citing the hardening of global crude oil prices and the devaluation of the rupee. This is a lame excuse. The current prices of petrol and diesel in India’s neighbouring countries Asia are much lower, as can be seen from Table 1.
Table1: Retail price of petrol and diesel (1 litre) in India and neighbouring countries (in Indian rupee) on September 1, 2018
Petrol |
Diesel |
|
India (Delhi) |
78.68 |
70.42 |
Pakistan |
53.55 |
61.47 |
Bangladesh |
73.48 |
55.54 |
Sri Lanka |
63.96 |
52.05 |
Nepal (Kathmandu) |
69.94 |
59.86 |
Source: Petroleum Planning & Analysis Cell (PPAC), Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas
Why are the retail prices of petrol and diesel higher in India? It is because of the high incidence of Central excise and state VAT imposed on these commodities. For every litre of petrol, the Central government currently collects an excise duty of Rs 19.48; for diesel the excise duty is Rs 15.33 per litre. The state governments impose VAT over and above this. The rate of indirect taxes (central excise and VAT taken together) have crossed 100% in the case of petrol and 70% in the case of diesel. Without taxes, the retail price of a litre of petrol and diesel should have been around Rs. 40, even at the current level of international crude oil prices.
Table 2: Tax Revenues of the Union government
Gross Tax Revenue |
Excise Duties on Petro-Products |
Corporate Tax |
Income Tax |
|
2009-10 |
624528 |
64012 |
244725 |
122475 |
2010-11 |
793072 |
76546 |
298688 |
139069 |
2011-12 |
889177 |
74829 |
322816 |
164485 |
2012-13 |
1036235 |
84188 |
356326 |
196512 |
2013-14 |
1138733 |
88065 |
394678 |
237817 |
2014-15 |
1244886 |
106653 |
428925 |
258326 |
2015-16 |
1455648 |
198793 |
453228 |
287628 |
2016-17 |
1715822 |
276551 |
484924 |
349436 |
2017-18 |
1946119 |
229019* |
563745 |
439255 |
Source: Receipts Budget, 2018-19; CAG Report Nos. 42 of 2017, Department of Revenue (Indirect Taxes – Central Excise) & CAG Report No. 17 of 2013, Department of Revenue (Compliance Audit on Indirect Taxes-Central Excise and Service)
*Note: Data on excise duties on petro-products for 2017-18 is provisional and has been sourced from PPAC Ready Reckoner, June 2018, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas
Table 2 provides the annual estimates of gross tax revenues of the union government under the UPA-II and the Modi regime along with the break-up of major tax-heads, namely excise duties on petro-products, corporate tax and income tax. Table 3 provides the share of these three major tax heads in gross tax revenue, calculated from Table 2.
It can be seen clearly from Table 3 that the reliance of the Union government on excise collections from petro-products have gone up considerably under the NDA. In the five years from 2009-10 to 2013-14, the share of excise collections from petro-products in gross tax revenues (GTR) averaged around 8.8%. From 2014-15 to 2017-18, the average went up to 12.5%. Simultaneously, the share of corporate tax collections in GTR fell from an average of 36.5% under UPA-II to 30.7%. The average share of income tax collections in GTR have increased from 19% under UPA-II to 21%.
Table 3: Share of Major Taxes in Gross Tax Revenues (GTR) of the Union government
Excise Duties on Petro-Products/GTR |
Corporate Tax/GTR |
Income Tax/GTR |
|
2009-10 |
10.2 |
39.2 |
19.6 |
2010-11 |
9.7 |
37.7 |
17.5 |
2011-12 |
8.4 |
36.3 |
18.5 |
2012-13 |
8.1 |
34.4 |
19.0 |
2013-14 |
7.7 |
34.7 |
20.9 |
2014-15 |
8.6 |
34.5 |
20.8 |
2015-16 |
13.7 |
31.1 |
19.8 |
2016-17 |
16.1 |
28.3 |
20.4 |
2017-18 |
11.8 |
29.0 |
22.6 |
Source: Same as Table 2
This exposes the class bias in the NDA’s revenue mobilisation strategy. While the tax share of large corporations have come down substantially, the tax share of fuel consumers and income tax payers has risen. The corporate class has benefitted at the cost of the poor and the middle class. This socially iniquitous and unjust revenue mobilisation strategy needs to be abandoned forthwith.
Petrol and diesel need to be brought under GST, just like kerosene and LPG. Even if the highest GST rate of 28% is applied, petrol and diesel would not cost more than Rs 55 per litre. The resulting revenue losses can be compensated through higher mobilisation of corporate taxes and doing away with corporate tax exemptions. Revenue foregone on account of corporate tax incentives have totalled over Rs 85,000 crore per year in the last two financial years, as per the receipts budget 2018-19. The pro-corporate bias in the revenue mobilisation strategy needs to be corrected.
Prasenjit Bose is an economist and political activist.
Courtesy: thewire.in
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
London, Nov 22: A bomb disposal squad deployed as a “precaution” to the South Terminal of Gatwick Airport concluded an investigation into a "security incident" on Friday after making a “suspect package” safe.
The South Terminal of Gatwick Airport, the UK's second busiest airport after Heathrow, which was briefly shut owing to the incident reopened following the incident.
The Gatwick is around 45 km south of London.
Two people detained during the enquiries have since been allowed to continue their journey as the airport was opened.
“Police have concluded their investigation into a report of a suspect package at Gatwick Airport. Officers from the EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) team made the package safe, and the airport has been handed back to its operator,” Sussex Police said in an updated statement.
“Two people detained while enquiries were ongoing have subsequently been allowed to continue their journeys. There will remain an increased police presence in the area to assist with passengers accessing the South Terminal for onward travel,” the statement added.
Earlier on Friday, the incident caused severe disruption at the busy airport’s South Terminal, while the North Terminal of Gatwick Airport remained unaffected.
“Police were called to the South Terminal at Gatwick Airport at 8.20 am on Friday (November 22) following the discovery of a suspected prohibited item in luggage,” a Sussex Police statement said.
“To ensure the safety of the public, staff and other airport users, a security cordon has been put in place whilst the matter is dealt with. As a precaution, an EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) team is being deployed to the airport. This is causing significant disruption and some roads around the South Terminal have been closed. We’d advise the public to avoid the area where possible,” it said.
Footage on social media taken outside the airport showed crowds of frustrated travellers being moved away from the terminal building.
Gatwick said it was working hard to resolve the issue.
“A large part of the South Terminal has been evacuated as a precaution while we continue to investigate a security incident," the airport said in a social media post.
“Passengers will not be able to enter the South Terminal while this is ongoing. The safety and security of our passengers and staff remain our top priority. We are working hard to resolve the issue as quickly as possible.”
Train and bus services that serve the airport were also impacted while the police carried out their inquiries.
In an unrelated incident in south London on Friday morning, the US Embassy area in Nine Elms by the River Thames was the scene of a controlled explosion by Scotland Yard dealing with what they believe may have been a “hoax device”.
“We can confirm the 'loud bang' reported in the area a short time ago was a controlled explosion carried out by officers,” the Metropolitan Police said in a post on X.
“Initial indications are that the item was a hoax device. An investigation will now follow. Some cordons will remain in place for the time being but the majority of the police response will now be stood down,” it added.