Dubai: In a disconcerting incident, the lifeless body of a young man from Belthnagady named Mohammed Raziq was discovered under suspicious circumstances in a hotel room in Dubai.

Mohammed Raziq, the son of Dawood and a resident of Kuppetti in Uruvalu village of Belthangady Taluk, had been staying in a hotel room in Dubai. Concerns arose when hotel staff noticed that Raziq did not wake up in the morning. Upon investigation, they tragically found that he had passed away.

The deceased youth had recently returned to his native place, got married, and subsequently traveled to Dubai for employment opportunities. The sudden and unexpected nature of his demise has raised suspicions surrounding the incident.

Further details pertaining to the incident are currently awaited as authorities continue their investigation into the matter.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court Thursday held that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) cannot arrest an accused under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) after a special court has taken cognisance of the complaint of money laundering.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan said when an accused appears before a court in pursuance of a summons, the agency will have to apply to the court concerned to get his custody.

"If the accused appears before the special court by summons (issued by court), it cannot be treated that he is in custody," it said.

"Accused who appeared before the court pursuant to the summons not required to apply for bail, and thus twin conditions of Section 45 of PMLA not applicable," the bench said in its judgment.

The twin conditions state that when an accused in a money laundering case applies for bail, the court has to first allow the public prosecutor to be heard and only when it is satisfied that the accused is not guilty and unlikely to commit a similar offence when released, can bail be granted.

The apex court judgment was pronounced on a question of whether an accused in a money laundering case has to meet the stringent twin test for bail even in cases where the special court takes cognisance of the offence.