In a talk--very interestingly titled, “coconut and other nutritional errors”-- a Harvard professor called coconut oil ‘pure poison’. This lecture about coconut oil-- which has fallen from grace in the recent years-- has gone viral on YouTube, garnering more than a million views.
After being worshipped as the ‘holy grail’ product for skin, hair and even health for years, this oil came under fire after the American Heart Association issued an advisory regarding the same in 2017. The AHA claimed that it can contribute to higher risk of heart diseases as it is full of saturated fat.
Now, Karin Michels, professor of epidemiology at Harvard, claimed in her lecture that coconut oil is not healthy and repeatedly called it “poison”. She also claimed that it is more harmful than lard (pig fat) as it is high in saturated fatty acids which, in turn, may clog arteries.
"I can only warn you urgently about coconut oil," she further added, calling it one of the “worst” foods that one can eat.
Her warnings come as a big shock as coconut oil is repeatedly being advertised as the multi-purpose oil which is the “ultimate” food for health. Surprisingly, there is little to no evidence to back the claim of it being the “superfood” that it has been made out to be since ages.
Professor Michels is not alone in slamming this oil, Dr Frank Sacks, who is a nutrition professor at the Harvard explained further, “Coconut oil is very high in saturated fat that raises your LDL cholesterol, which is a bad cholesterol. It is unhealthy to consume it.”
What should you do?
The bottom line is that while there is limited research about coconut oil's impact on the body--whether good or bad. It is always good to remember that moderation is the key, so if you are going to use coconut oil, use it in moderation. But, if this research scares you, you can always swap it with virgin olive oil.
courtesy : timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Bengaluru: Bengaluru Milk Union Ltd President D.K. Suresh on Monday said it is inappropriate for MLAs to seek free IPL tickets, adding that those interested in watching matches should pay for them personally.
Speaking to reporters near his residence in Sadashivanagar, he said, “IPL is a commercial tournament and does not represent the country. It is not right for public representatives to focus too much on such matters.”
Referring to the recent controversy during the RCB celebrations, he said, “let us find out who benefited the most from the statements made during the incident.” He also pointed out that BJP MLAs had received IPL tickets as well.
Responding to discussions about relocating the Chinnaswamy Stadium, Suresh said the government has already approved the construction of a new stadium at a location he had proposed.
“I had suggested building a stadium in Surya City and submitted a proposal for it. Bengaluru needs four stadiums in four directions to cater to its growing population and encourage youth participation in sports,” he said.
He noted that apart from Kanteerava Stadium, KSCA, and the Football Stadium, there are limited facilities in the city.
“When I was a Lok Sabha member, I had proposed allocating 100 acres in my constituency at Surya City. The land was later earmarked and the plan approved,” he added.
Suresh said he has discussed the project with Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan, Rajiv Gandhi Housing Corporation Chairman Shivalingegowda, and Anekal MLA Shivanna.
“The Cabinet has now approved the project, and a stadium will be developed on around 50–60 acres,” he said.
He further added that he has requested the Deputy Chief Minister to build another stadium at Shivarama Karanth Layout through the BDA, where 40 acres have been allocated. Plans are also being discussed to develop a well-equipped stadium in Bidadi.
Commending state government's recent bilingual policy move, Suresh said forcing children to learn three languages could affect their comprehension.
“It is a good decision to make two languages compulsory. Learning a third language should be left to the choice of students and parents,” he said.
Responding to criticism from BJP leaders, he said their tendency is to oppose every decision of the government.
“To please their central leadership, they take a pro-Hindi stance. Instead, they should advocate for the adoption of Kannada in all states,” he said.
When asked about the earlier three-language policy under Congress, he said, “the situation is different now. Today, the focus should be on quality learning. Kannada should remain the primary language, while students and parents can choose an additional language.”
