Cosmetic surgeries require thorough research, be aware of “fake clinics”
In the wake of an upswing in cosmetic surgeries across India, the trend toward quick transformations has led some individuals to make dangerous choices, often opting for clinics based solely on marketing claims. This practice can result in life-threatening consequences. The death of Muhammad Mazin following a procedure in Mangalore has raised concerns about the dangers of choosing clinics based on marketing claims. This incident has sparked discussions about the risks of unregulated practices in the cosmetic surgery industry.
Not all “clinics” are medically certified
It is imperative for prospective cosmetic surgery patients to do comprehensive research on the credentials and qualifications of centres, as well as the experience of the medical staff involved. Just because outlets present themselves as “clinics” does not necessarily mean that such establishments are medically certified.
A concerning trend is the proliferation of unlicensed clinics, with the Karnataka Health Department data indicating that since 2007, clinics and laboratories run by 1436 ‘fake’ doctors have been sealed as of November 2023.
Experts from the field that VB consulted emphasised that thorough research is crucial. They noted that when considering any surgical procedure, it is essential to evaluate the entire healthcare setup—surgeons, anaesthetists, back-up ICU services, and the availability of specialists for emergencies. Furthermore, board certificates and accreditations are key factors to consider when selecting a clinic.
Private clinics' registration mandatory under KPME Act
Notably, under the Karnataka Private Medical Establishments (KPME) Act, it is mandatory for all private medical establishments in the state to obtain a KPME registration. Section 19 of the KPME Amendment Act, 2017, stipulates that anyone who establishes or runs an unregistered private medical institution can face imprisonment for up to three years and a fine of Rs 1 lakh. Furthermore, such institutions are legally required to provide emergency care without demanding advance payment.
Cosmetic surgeries can be fatal without thorough research
The tragic incident in Karnataka, where a 32-year-old man, Muhammad Mazin, reportedly died following a cosmetic surgery procedure earlier this month has gained significant attention. He had visited a private cosmetic surgery and transplant clinic in Mangaluru for a liposuction procedure to treat gynecomastia (surgical correction of enlarged breasts). The surgery was extended for hours, and his family received no updates until they were informed of a critical health decline. Mazin was rushed to a private hospital in Kodialbail, where he was declared dead on arrival. This case is not a one-off incident. A 28-year-old man in Hyderabad allegedly died in February this year after undergoing a cosmetic dental procedure at a private clinic to enhance his smile just days before his wedding.
Be aware of misleading advertisements
An area of concern is when people fall victim to misleading advertisements and claims about cosmetic surgeries. It is always better for the patient to meet the doctor in person and assess their qualifications. Patients should seek professionals who instil confidence and demonstrate expertise, ensuring they feel comfortable with the clinic's setup.
The onus lies upon the surgeon and patient to do their research. Effective communication between them is paramount. Asking the right questions to make an informed decision goes a long way. Experts have stressed that for a successful operation outcome, it is a 50-50 job between the surgeon and the patient.
Parameters for NABH accreditation
It is important to do extensive research about the whole facility available at the clinic. A good place to start is to check whether clinics possess accreditations from recognised bodies, such as National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers (NABH), which establishes quality standards in healthcare.
NABH has developed relevant and accessible quality assurance methods for clinics. The parameters for accreditation include access to quality treatment, good care of patients, hygiene, upholding patient rights, facilities management, fire safety measures, infection control, and managing records, among others.
Accreditation signifies a commitment to continuous improvement and patient safety, ensuring that rights are upheld and quality care is provided. Experts advocate for choosing established, reputable institutions equipped with experienced professionals, state-of-the-art technology, hygienic equipment, safety measures, board certifications, and accreditations to mitigate risks associated with cosmetic procedures.
The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified the desire for cosmetic enhancements, driven partly by social media influence. Common cosmetic procedures among men include gynecomastia while women frequently seek rhinoplasty (nose job), lip job, and body contouring.
Take your time before making a final choice
As cosmetic surgery becomes increasingly popular, it’s essential for individuals to approach these procedures with caution. Instead of being swayed by flashy advertisements or marketing claims, patients should take the time to thoroughly research and verify the credentials of clinics and surgeons. Choosing a qualified and experienced surgeon is critical to minimising risks and achieving satisfactory outcomes. Moreover, understanding the potential risks and having in-depth discussions with healthcare providers about the procedure can provide clarity and help set realistic expectations.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Vinod Tawde seeks apology from Kharge, Rahul through legal notice, warns of defamation lawsuit
Cash-for-vote row
New Delhi, Nov 22: BJP leader Vinod Tawde has demanded an apology from Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi for making "false and baseless" allegations against him in the cash-for-votes incident in Maharashtra, saying if they don't he would sue them for defamation.
Tawde was accused by Bahujan Vikas Aghadi, a regional party, of distributing Rs 5 crore to woo voters, with its members barging into a hotel room on November 19 in a Mumbai suburb, where the BJP leader was present.
The former Maharashtra minister and BJP national general secretary claimed innocence, saying the alleged amount was not recovered in the probe by the Election Commission and police.
"The Congress only believes in spreading lies, and this incident is a proof of the party's low level politics to dent me and my party's image," Tawde said.
The two Congress leaders and the party spokesperson Supriya Shrinate seized on the row to accuse the BJP of using money power to influence the November 20 assembly polls in the state.
The legal notice sent to the three claimed that they were aware that they were pushing a "totally false story fabricated" by them.
"You all have deliberately, mischievously with the sole intention of damaging the reputation of our client intentionally fabricated the story distribution of money. You all have published false, baseless allegations against our client on various media for tarnishing his image in the eyes of right thinking people in the society," the notice read.
The Congress leaders were in a "great hurry" to damage Tawde's reputation, they did not bother to check the fact and or despite knowing the entire fact they made the false, baseless allegations, it said.
"The entire imputation made by you all are totally false, baseless, malicious and mala fide and as our client is in no way involved in any such illegal activity and as a responsible office bearer of the national political party he is aware of his duties," it added.
The notice demanded an "unconditional apology" to Tawde within 24 hours from the time the receipt of the notice, which was sent on November 21, and published in newspapers and X.
If they do not offer apology, then Tawde will initiate criminal proceedings under Section 356, which covers defamation, of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and also civil proceedings for the damages of Rs 100 crore against the three Congress leaders, the notice said.
