5 Activists Gang-Raped In Jharkhand, Allegedly At Gunpoint
PATNA: Five women from a non-profit conducting an awareness campaign at a tribal area of Jharkhand were abducted and gang-raped at gunpoint. The men accompanying them have been thrashed. The police said the rapists made a video and used it to threaten the women with exposure if they complained.
The 11-member team, belonging to a non-profit supported by local Christian missionaries, had gone to hold a street play against human trafficking at Kochang in Khunti district, around 50 km from state capital Ranchi.
As the performance was in progress, a group of armed men came on bikes, beat up the men and took away the women at gunpoint. They were released in the jungle three hours later. The two nuns who had accompanied the women, however, were released unharmed.
After being threatened by the men, the women did not inform the administration about the incident. The officials were tipped off by sources, reported news agency Press Trust of India, quoting local police officer Ashwini Kumar Sinha.
The police have detained nine persons for questioning and a medical board has also been formed, the police said. Medical examination has confirmed rape and a case has been filed. Mr Sinha said three teams have been formed to investigate the matter and arrest the culprits.
Reports from the area say the men involved are supporters of Pathalgadi -- a tribal system under which the people govern themselves according to the tribe's rules and do not recognize the state's authority. They argue that the Constitution has given them the right to practice their own systems.
The name Pathalgadi is related to the huge stone slabs inscribed with ancestral names that are preserved by the villagers.
Outsiders, including the police and government officials, are not allowed in these villages without permission.
courtesy : ndtv.com
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Kerala CM's remarks against IUML supremo evokes sharp reactions
Thiruvananthapuram (PTI): Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan's remarks against Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) supremo Panakkad Sadiq Ali Shihab Thangal evoked sharp reactions from the Congress and the League on Monday.
The leadership of the Congress and the League alleged that the statements of the CPI(M) veteran were a reflection of his and his party's close nexus with communal forces.
While addressing a bypoll campaign meeting of LDF candidate P Sarin in Pallakad on Sunday, the CM criticised IUML supremo Thangal, saying he was acting like a worker of Jamaat-e-Islami.
The IUML, the second-largest coalition partner in the Congress-led UDF, made a strongly worded attack against the Left veteran through an editorial in the party mouthpiece "Chandrika."
In the editorial, the IUML said the people of Kerala fondly call Panakkad Thangal as the brand ambassador of communal harmony, and CM Vijayan should not come to "assess his qualifications".
"Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan's attempt to evaluate Thangal's qualifications reflects his and his party's close ties with communal forces," the mouthpiece alleged.
At a time when the Sangh Parivar forces are making all attempts to destroy the communal harmony of the state and try to create communal polarisation by raising various issues, CM Vijayan and the Left government have been constantly doing things that support them, it claimed.
The attitude towards top police officers who were facing allegations in the disruption of Thrissur Pooram and the stand in the waqf land issue in Munambam were examples of this collaboration, it further alleged.
By targeting Panakkad Thangal and his Kodappanakkal family, who have played a key role in fostering the communal harmony of the state, Vijayan has given strong support to the interests of Sangh Parivar forces, the editorial said.
The IUML mouthpiece also sought to know why the chief minister had become disturbed and intolerant when a former leader of the BJP came to the secular fold without any conditions and sought the blessings of Thangal.
"If it is not the reflection of Sangh Parivar connections, what else?" it asked.
The editorial also said it could not be viewed as a coincidence that the Babri Masjid demolition issue was used by Vijayan to criticise Thangal.
When IUML leader K M Shaji asked Pinarayi Vijayan not to "assess the qualifications" of Panakkad Thangal, Congress leader and Palakkad bypoll candidate Rahul Mamkootathil said the remarks were part of his "Sanghi nature."
"The CM's remarks against Thangal were not a political attack. It was the exposition of his (CM's) Sanghi nature," Mamkootathil said.
He alleged that Vijayan's "Sanghi nature", hidden by public relations agencies, would come out at times.
Mamkootathil also said that such a statement was expected from BJP state chief K Surendran, but here, the CM is making such remarks.
Vijayan on Sunday criticised the meeting of former BJP leader Sandeep G Varier and the top leaders of Indian Union Muslim League, a day after he joined the Congress party, saying the workers and supporters of the IUML won't accept this.
Varier was received by IUML chief Panakkad Sadiq Ali Shihab Thangal, veteran party leader P K Kunhalikutty and other party leaders.
Vijayan said the news of Varier's paying visit to IUML leaders brought back memories of an election held in Ottapalam in this district soon after the demolition of the Babri Masjid many years ago.
The CM alleged that though the masjid was demolished by the RSS-led Sangh Parivar, it was the then Prime Minister Narasimha Rao and the Congress-led Central government that had extended all support for that.
He further charged that the then IUML leadership was not willing to question the Congress party in Kerala over this out of fear of losing the ministership in the UDF government in the state at that time.
The IUML leadership had to face the ire of the party workers then, as they had failed to oppose the wrong stand adopted by the Congress party, he alleged.
Referring to the present developments, the CM said the people of the state were aware of all these facts and would realise the opportunistic stand.
