Amartya Sen raises concerns over SIR, claims it risks 'disenfranchising' poor people
Kolkata (PTI): Nobel laureate economist Amartya Sen expressed concerns over the special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, warning that the exercise, if not handled sensitively, could end up "disenfranchising" a large number of poor and marginalised people.
Sen also questioned the fairness of a bureaucratic process that demands strict documentation from citizens who may not have access to those things.
He also said that administrative processes and periodic revisions are necessary, but these must not come at the cost of fundamental rights.
"Yes, it's true that from time to time various procedural tasks need to be carried out. However, in doing so, one cannot create a 'better system' by trampling on the rights of the poor," Sen told reporters here on Friday.
He emphasised the importance of a just and inclusive approach, pointing out that many individuals still lack proper documentation and, as a result, are often excluded from the electoral process.
"Many people don't have documents. Many cannot vote...If, in the name of trying to improve things a little, harm is caused to many, then that becomes a serious mistake," Sen said, adding, "You cannot justify seven new mistakes just to correct one".
The special intensive revision of electoral rolls by the Election Commission is aimed at updating and verifying the accuracy of electoral rolls, thereby creating clean and error-free lists.
The process has drawn criticism from political parties and rights activists.
More than 65 lakh enumeration forms were ‘not included’ in the draft electoral rolls prepared as part of the first phase of SIR by the Election Commission (EC) in Bihar, bringing down the total number of around 7.9 crore registered voters to 7.24 crore.
The EC had come out with the names of 65 lakh people who were removed from the draft electoral rolls published as part of the SIR exercise in Bihar.
Sen's comments echo growing concerns that the SIR, without adequate safeguards, could lead to wrongful deletions of eligible voters from the rolls, an outcome that threatens the very foundation of democratic participation.
Globally acclaimed for his work on poverty, welfare, and justice, Sen also reminded that procedural improvements should not come at the cost of people's rights.
"A just system must always protect those who are most vulnerable," he said.
Sen spoke at a public discussion on the theme "India's Youth: Social Opportunities They Should Have", where he interacted with a group of undergraduate and high-school students.
During the interaction, the 91-year-old economist underscored the urgent need for India to move beyond passive tolerance towards active communal cooperation, what he described as "yukta sadhana", or "joint practice".
Citing historical precedents, the professor highlighted the contributions of Dara Shikoh, the eldest son of Mughal emperor Shah Jahan, who translated fifty Upanishads from Sanskrit to Persian.
This pivotal work, he noted, played a crucial role in globalising Hindu philosophy, forming the basis for subsequent translations into languages such as German.
The economist also spoke of his maternal grandfather, Kshitimohan Sen, a renowned scholar and early proponent of "yukta sadhana", whose seminal work "Bharate Hindu Musalmaner Yukta Sadhana" examined the shared cultural, spiritual, and intellectual traditions of Hindus and Muslims in India.
"The relationship between Hindus and Muslims is not just about tolerance. It's about collaboration, something we've seen historically in music, literature, and architecture," he said.
The book, long out of print, was relaunched by the Pratichi Trust on Friday, with a new introduction penned by the economist, reaffirming its contemporary relevance in light of rising social and political polarisation.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
2019 mud attack on engineer: Maharashtra court sentences BJP minister Nitesh Rane to one-month jail
Mumbai (PTI): A court in Sindhudurg on Monday convicted Maharashtra minister Nitesh Rane in a 2019 case of pouring mud on an NHAI engineer when he was in opposition, and sentenced him to one-month imprisonment, noting that lawmakers are not supposed to take the law into their hands.
Later, the court suspended Rane's sentence, allowing him time to appeal before a higher court, while acquitting 29 other accused in the case.
"Even though Rane's intention was to raise a voice against the poor quality of work and inconvenience faced by the people, he was not supposed to humiliate or insult a public servant in public," additional sessions court judge V S Deshmukh stated.
"If such incidents continue to occur, public servants would not be able to discharge their duties with dignity," the judge noted.
ALSO READ: 19-yr-old woman found hanging from tree in UP village; juvenile held
Calling the act "abuse of power", the court held that "it is the demand of time to curb such tendency".
Rane, a son of former Union minister Narayan Rane, was among 30 people charged under various offences, including rioting, assault to deter a public servant, and criminal conspiracy. He was in Congress when the incident occurred.
All the accused, including Nitesh Rane, were acquitted of these offences, as the court found insufficient evidence to support most of these claims.
However, the court found Nitesh Rane guilty of an offence under section 504 (intentional insult meant to provoke a breach of public peace) and sentenced him to one month's jail.
Rane, then a Congress MLA, had called the Sub-Divisional Engineer of the National Highway Authority, Prakash Shedekar, to a bridge over the Gad river in Kankavli on July 4, 2019, for inspecting the work to widen the Mumbai-Goa Highway.
According to the prosecution, Nitesh Rane and his followers, frustrated by the poor quality of the roadwork and waterlogging, confronted the engineer. They poured muddy water on Shedekar and forced him to walk through slush in public.
The court, after perusing the evidence on record, noted that the informant (victim) was holding a high post in the National Highway Authority.
"Despite that, he was made to walk through the muddy water in public. It would have certainly humiliated and insulted him," the court remarked.
The judge held that Rane compelling Shedekar to walk through the muddy water "was nothing but an intentional insult to the informant," and provocation which will cause him to break the public peace.
