Jaipur (PTI): Tensions flared in the Johri Bazar area here as protesters gathered in large numbers late on Friday night, accusing BJP MLA Balmukund Acharya of raising slogans targeting a community and pasting an offensive poster inside the Jama Masjid, a charge the lawmaker denied categorically.
Acharya, however, explained that he had joined a public meeting in the city's Badi Chaupad area during the day to pay tributes to the tourists slain by terrorists in Pahalgam and raised slogans condemning the act of terror and Pakistan, which India holds indirectly responsible for the bloodbath.
"People had gathered in large numbers and raised slogans, demanding action against the BJP MLA. The situation was brought under control peacefully," DCP (North) Rashi Dogra said on Saturday.
As the protest erupted, the Congress' Kishanpole MLA Amin Kagzi and Adarsh Nagar legislator Rafiq Khan also arrived at the scene, lending support to the demonstrators. A delegation of the agitators met Police Commissioner Biju George Joseph over the matter.
Later in the night, an FIR was filed at the Manak Chowk police station on Jama Masjid Committee member's complaint that Arharya and his supporters entered the mosque during night prayers, raised slogans targeting a community, pasted an offensive poster on the mosque's stairs, and making threats.
"We were offering night prayers when Balmukund Acharya entered the mosque, raised slogans and pasted objectionable posters on the stairs. Later, we met the police commissioner and registered an FIR," said Jama Masjid Committee Secretary Zaheer Ullah Khan.
Reacting to the incident, Acharya posted on X that he had participated in a protest earlier in the day against the recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam.
"On a call given by Sarva Hindu Samaj, I joined a public outrage meeting at Jaipur's Badi Chaupad today to protest against the terrorist attack in Pahalgam and paid tributes to the innocent people killed. I protested against this incident by raising slogans of 'Pakistan Murdabad, Aatankvad Murdabad' (Down with Pakistan, down with terrorism)," Acharya wrote on the social media platform.
He added that thousands of people in Jaipur participated in the protest and expressed their anger over the incident.
Police said a case has been registered and an investigation initiated. The crowd outside the mosque dispersed peacefully after getting assurances from officials about police action over their complaints.
Religious sentiments are on the rise in some pockets following the dastardly terror attack on Tuesday that led to the death of 26 tourists. It got whipped up all the more after reports emerged that the attackers had asked about the religion of the victims before killing them.
Hindu Raksha Dal has issued online threats to Kashmiri students living in Dehradun, asking them to leave the state immediately while a restaurant worker was shot dead and his co-worker injured in Agra, with the accused claiming that it was to avenge the Pahalgam attack.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday directed that the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, be listed before a bench led by Justice B.R. Gavai. The decision was announced by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna, who noted that Justice Khanna is nearing retirement and the matter requires an early hearing.
The case titled In Re: Waqf Amendment Act was heard by a bench comprising CJI Khanna, Justice Sanjay Kumar, and Justice K.V. Viswanathan. The CJI stated that although he had reviewed the counter-affidavit filed by the Union government and the rejoinders submitted by the petitioners, he did not wish to reserve judgment at the interim stage. With the consent of all parties, including Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and A.M. Singhvi for the petitioners and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for the Union, the matter was reassigned to Justice Gavai’s bench for hearing on May 15.
In previous hearings on April 16 and 17, the bench engaged in detailed discussions. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal had raised strong objections to the omission of the ‘waqf by user’ provision, arguing that such waqfs — many centuries old — often lack formal registration documents. Solicitor General Mehta responded that the amendment was prospective and that registered waqf properties would not be affected.
The Court also took note of concerns about the inclusion of non-Muslim members in the Central Waqf Council and State Waqf Boards. CJI Khanna pointedly asked whether non-Hindus are similarly included in bodies overseeing Hindu religious endowments. In response to these concerns, the Court suggested interim directions to prevent any significant changes, including a proposal that only Muslims (barring ex-officio members) should serve on the Waqf Boards and Council. It also indicated that court-declared waqf properties should not be denotified during the pendency of the case.
The Union government, through SG Mehta, assured the Court that no fresh appointments would be made to the Waqf bodies and that the status of existing waqf lands would remain unaffected. These assurances were recorded by the Court.
The petitions, supported by a wide array of individuals and organisations including MPs from AIMIM, RJD, SP, TMC, CPI, DMK, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, and others challenge multiple provisions of the Amendment Act.
Meanwhile, BJP-led state governments of Assam, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, Haryana, and Maharashtra have filed intervention applications supporting the amendment.
The matter will now be heard on May 15 by the bench led by Justice Gavai.