Delhi Court grants bail to CM Arvind Kejriwal in alleged excise policy case
New Delhi: A Delhi court has granted bail to Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in the money laundering case connected to the alleged excise policy scandal. The decision came on Thursday, providing temporary relief to the Aam Aadmi Party leader amidst ongoing investigations.
Kejriwal was granted bail after his legal team argued that the charges were politically motivated and lacked substantial evidence. The court, after reviewing the arguments, decided to release him on bail, allowing him to continue his duties as the Chief Minister.
The money laundering case is part of a larger investigation into the Delhi government's excise policy, which has faced allegations of corruption.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
FIR filed against TMC's Abhishek over 'inflammatory' remarks during Bengal polls
Kolkata (PTI): The West Bengal Police on Saturday said they have registered an FIR against Trinamool Congress MP Abhishek Banerjee for allegedly making inflammatory statements during the recently concluded assembly elections.
The FIR was lodged based on a complaint filed by Social activist Rajib Sarkar at Baguiati Police Station in North 24 Parganas district on May 5, a day after the assembly election results were declared, alleging that the TMC national general secretary made provocative comments on post-poll violence and the vote counting process, a senior officer said.
The complainant also claimed that Banerjee's inflammatory comments were linked to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, he said.
"Following due procedure after the filing of the complaint, an FIR was formally registered at the Cyber Crime Police Station under the Bidhannagar Police Commissionerate on May 15," the officer said.
The case has been registered under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Representation of the People Act, he said.
The complainant accused Banerjee of delivering inflammatory speeches during several election-related programmes between April 27 and May 3.
“The complainant alleged that certain remarks made during public meetings were provocative in nature and had the potential to disturb public order and communal harmony. The contents are being examined as part of the investigation,” the police officer added.
