J-K Assembly adjourned again following ruckus over Waqf Act, PDP member marshalled out
_vb_55.jpeg)
Jammu (PTI): The Jammu and Kashmir Assembly was adjourned by for the second time on Tuesday following a ruckus in the House by National Conference (NC), Congress, PDP and other members over the disallowance of adjournment of business to discuss the Waqf Amendment Act.
This is the second consecutive day on which treasury benches did not allow the House to function.
As the House assembled for the day, NC members led by Salman Sagar, Tanvir Sadiq and Peoples Conference member Sajad Gani Lone raised the issue of adjourning the Budget Session to discuss the Bill in the House.
As Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather asked them to allow the Question Hour to begin, members of NC, Congress, PDP, and Independents trooped into the well of the House, raising slogans and demanding the withdrawal of the "black law."
Amid the noisy scenes, PDP member Waheed-ur-Rehman Parra stormed into the well of the House, demanding the immediate passage of the resolution moved by his party.
As Parra, carrying a copy of the resolution in his hand, pressed for its passage, NC leader Abdul Majid Larmi accused him of being an "RSS agent," sparking a heated verbal exchange between NC members and other opposition legislators, including Sheikh Kursheed.
When Parra attempted to enter the well of the House, the Speaker directed Marshals to evict him.
"I was demanding passage of the resolution in the House over the Bill. It is unfortunate on the part of the Speaker to remove me from the House. This is a Muslim majority region. We have over 60 Muslim legislators in the House, but we cannot discuss and pass the resolution," he told reporters outside the House.
Nine members of the NC, Congress, and Independent MLAs had submitted notices to the Speaker to adjourn business for holding a discussion on the issue on Monday. The House was adjourned for the day after two adjournments due to the pandemonium.
Amid noisy scenes, NC members Nazir Gurezi, Salman Sagar, and Tanvir Sadiq urged the Speaker to allow the discussion, considering the sentiments of the members as it pertained to a religious matter.
"We want to discuss the issue. It is our religious matter. This is a Muslim-majority state. Please allow the discussion," Gurezi said.
The Speaker said that the motion was disallowed as the matter was sub-judice. "You cannot undo what Parliament has done. No discussion can be held on this. I have not allowed any discussion," the Speaker said.
As pandemonium broke out in the House, the Speaker initially adjourned the proceedings for 30 minutes. The ruckus continued in the House for over 12 minutes.
When the House reassembled after the adjournment, treasury benches and PDP members continued to demand a discussion on the issue.
The Jammu and Kashmir government on Tuesday said it has concerns over the Waqf Amendment Act and urged Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather to hold a discussion on it in the House.
"This government is chosen by the people. Members have been elected by the people. If it is the concern of the members, it is the concern of the government too. We cannot say it is not the concern of the government," Deputy Chief Minister Surinder Choudhary told the House amid the uproar.
He said the members wanted a discussion on the issue as it concerned most members of the House. "We should listen to them. They should be allowed to speak on the issue," he said.
He was reacting to Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather’s ruling in the House that the issue, apart from being sub-judice, cannot be taken up for discussion as it is not the concern of the government.
Referring to Section 58, sub-rule 9, the Speaker said, "The motion shall not relate to a matter which is not primarily the concern of the government. If it is not the concern of this government, the motion cannot be taken up."
This triggered massive protests from members, who thumped desks and raised slogans.
Responding to him, Minister for Agriculture Javed Dar and Minister Sakina Itoo said it is the concern of the government.
Nazir Gurezi of the NC said the Supreme Court has not admitted the matter as no notices have been issued. "Keeping this in view, a discussion can be held," he said.
However, BJP member Sham Lal Sharma and Peoples Conference member Sajad Lone told the protesting treasury benches to bring a no-confidence motion to remove the Speaker.
As the ruckus continued, the Speaker adjourned the House till 1 pm.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
BIS seizes Rs 2.5 cr worth of counterfeit goods in major Flipkart warehouse raid
Bengaluru, Apr 22 (PTI): The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) on Wednesday announced that during a search and seizure operation at the largest warehouse in South India, operated by Instakart Services Private Limited (trading under the name Flipkart), it was found that the firm was allegedly storing and selling products that violated the quality control orders issued by the central government and the BIS Act, 2016.
The estimated market value of the seized items is around Rs 2.5 crore, it said.
The operation, conducted on April 22 by the BIS's Bangalore Branch Office, revealed that several product models seized from the premises were not licensed, misused the ISI mark and registration mark, and violated the terms and conditions of the BIS license.
"Some of these products fall under the Compulsory Registration Scheme (CRS), while others are subject to Mandatory Certification by BIS, in accordance with the QCOs. These orders mandate that no product shall be manufactured or sold without a valid BIS license and compliance with the relevant Indian Standards," said a BIS statement.
According to the BIS, approximately 104 varieties, comprising around 17,500 units—including wireless earbuds, Bluetooth earphones, speakers, toys, footwear, cables, and more—were found in violation and seized.
The BIS team, led by Narender Reddy Beesu (Director) and other senior officials, confirmed that a case would be filed in a court of law.
"Legal action will be initiated against the firm under Section 17(3) read with Section 29 of the BIS Act, 2016. The Act provides for imprisonment of up to two years or a fine of not less than Rs 2 lakh for the first offence. For subsequent offences, the fine shall not be less than Rs 5 lakh, and may extend up to ten times the value of the goods, or both, as determined by the court," the statement added.
The BIS urged consumers to always verify the BIS Standard Mark (ISI mark) and license number of manufacturers before making purchases.
The authenticity of a license and the relevant Indian Standard can be verified through the BIS CARE mobile app, it said.
During the operation, the team also educated warehouse personnel on how to check product compliance before allowing sellers to store goods on the premises.
