Journalism passing through 'critical phase'; fake news emerges as new menace: Ram Nath Kovind
New Delhi, Jan 20: Stating that journalism has been passing through a "critical phase", President Ram Nath Kovind on Monday said fake news has emerged as a new menace whose purveyors proclaim themselves as journalists and taint the noble profession.
Speaking at the prestigious Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Awards, he said stories exposing great social and economic inequalities are ignored, and their place is taken by trivia.
"Instead of helping promote scientific temper, some run after irrational practices in their search for eyeballs and ratings," Kovind said.
The fundamental principle of restraint and responsibility has been undermined substantially in the loud noise of the "breaking news syndrome", he said.
"In the din of the 'breaking news' syndrome that has consumed the media now, this fundamental principle of restraint and responsibility has been undermined substantially," the president said.
Kovind said old-timers would recall the magical touchstone of the five Ws and one H (what, when, why, where, who and how) whose answers were essential for a story to qualify as a news report.
"Fake news has emerged as a new menace whose purveyors proclaim themselves as journalists and taint this noble profession," he said.
Kovind said Ramnath Goenka would have never allowed the situation to go adrift and initiated measures for course correction for the whole media fraternity.
"There is no doubt that journalism has been passing through a critical phase," the president said.
He said that journalists tend to wear many hats in the line of their duty.
"These days, they often assume the role of an investigator, a prosecutor and a judge -- all rolled into one," he said.
Kovind said it requires a great deal of inner strength and incredible passion for journalists to play so many roles at a time to arrive at truth.
"Their versatility is praiseworthy. But that prompts me to ask if such a sweeping exercise of power is accompanied by genuine accountability?" he asked while
Addressing the gathering comprising large number of journalists, the president said the quest for truth is, of course, difficult and easier said than done.
"But it must be pursued," he said.
Kovind said a democracy, like ours, deeply relies on the uncovering of facts and a willingness to debate them.
"Democracy is meaningful only when the citizen is well informed," he added.
He said technology has given rise to a new breed of journalism which stands in contrast to traditional journalism.
"This development has revived the old debates about the status of facts and opinions, about credibility and authenticity. What is desirable is objectivity, which allows journalists to be open to facts, and present all sides of a picture. Fidelity to facts, digging for truth and keeping one's lens clean and sharp is imperative," he said.
Earlier, Chairman and Managing Director of the Express Group Viveck Goenka said there has been a sharp drop in the quality entries from TV channels among the broadcast entries and more and more purely digital players are doing better work.
"...Clearly the noise at 9 pm and number of faces crowding the screen, the TV screen becoming one large WhatsApp group where the anchor is the administrator, this does not translate into stellar work," he said.
The president said good and excellent journalistic work needs to be nurtured more than ever as we are "inundated with social media that provokes rather than informs, that encourages echo rather than reflection, whose credibility is in perpetual doubt".
Quoting cult poem 'Hum Dekhenge' of revolutionary poet Faiz Ahmed Faiz which is in the centre of recent debates on channels, Chief Editor of Indian Express Raj Kamal Jha said there is more 'Hum Dekhenge' than 'Hum Sunenge' on TV.
"So in the 'tu tu main main' on television a very telling line in that poem slipped away. The one in which the poet links the main (me) and the tum (you)," Jha said.
He said good journalism listens to both - "the mai" and "the tum".
"It defines no cut-off date. It does not ask for any identity proof. What it needs is a pencil, a notebook and two feet firmly planted in the middle. However strong the tug might be from either side. Only then it can tell stories as there is never one story," he said.
Referring to protests across the country on the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), Jha said these young women and men "stepping out of the cold into the cold" and are marking out public squares.
One can agree or disagree with them, he said.
"They are the architects of space which may look very divided but is very valuable. For that space goes beyond the patch of pavement in a city. It includes the space in which we sit here this evening, in which we hear voices which we haven't heard before. It is a space that needs to be secured because it secures your and our space," he said.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Ordinance issued to increase number of Supreme Court judges from 34 to 38
New Delhi (PTI): The government has promulgated an ordinance to increase the strength of the Supreme Court from the present 34 judges to 38, including the Chief Justice of India.
The law ministry notified the ordinance on Saturday, which amended the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956, to increase the sanctioned strength of the top court.
So far, the sanctioned strength of the top court was 34, including the Chief Justice of India (CJI). Now, the number of judges has been increased by four, taking the sanctioned strength to 38.
The top court will now have 37 judges, other than the CJI.
With the apex court having two vacancies at present, and the ordinance coming into force immediately, the Supreme Court Collegium will now have to recommend six names for appointment as judges in the top court.
A bill will be brought in the Monsoon Session of Parliament to convert the ordinance – an executive order – into a law passed by Parliament.
The Union Cabinet had cleared a draft bill on May 5 to increase the number of apex court judges.
The strength of the Supreme Court was last increased from 30 to 33 (excluding the CJI) in 2019.
The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, as originally enacted in 1956, put the maximum number of judges (excluding the CJI) at 10.
This number was increased to 13 by the Supreme Court (Number of Judges), Amendment Act, 1960, and to 17 by another amendment to the law.
The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Act, 1986, augmented the strength of judges from 17 to 25, excluding the CJI.
A fresh amendment in 2009 further increased the strength from 25 to 30.
Article 124(3) of the Constitution lists the qualifications required to become a Supreme Court judge.
An Indian citizen who has either served as a high court judge for at least five years, or as an advocate for 10 years, or is a distinguished jurist, can be appointed to the top court.
The strength of the Supreme Court is increased based on the recommendations of the CJI, who writes to the Union law minister. After consulting the finance ministry, the Department of Justice under the law ministry moves the Cabinet with a draft bill.
