Kalburgi killed for remark on idols, suspect tells police
Bengaluru, Oct 05: KANNADA SCHOLAR and writer M M Kalburgi, who was killed outside his home in Dharwad in North Karnataka on August 30, 2015, was reportedly targeted for a remark he made in June 2014, when he quoted Jnanpith awardee U R Ananthamurthy to say that urinating on idols would not attract divine retribution.
According to sources, Ganesh Miskin (27), one of two suspects arrested by the Karnataka Police CID for Kalburgi’s murder, has said that the 77-year-old scholar’s statement, made during a discussion on an anti-superstition Bill, was perceived as “anti-Hindu”, and triggered the attack on him. Miskin and Amit Baddi (28), both linked to a radical Hindu outfit, were arrested by the CID on September 15, after a Special Investigation Team (SIT) of the Karnataka Police probing the September 5, 2017 murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh (55) indicated their possible involvement in the Kalburgi case.
Both the youths are from the Hubbali-Dharwad twin city region in North Karnataka. They were earlier among 16 persons linked to radical Hindu outfits from Goa, Maharashtra and Karnataka who were arrested by the SIT in the Gauri Lankesh case. Both have a criminal record for involvement in communal violence in Hubbali area. Miskin had earlier given a similar account to the SIT.
Sources said that Miskin, in the course of his interrogation by the CID, revealed knowledge of the Kalburgi murder, but denied any involvement in the shooting. The duo were in the CID’s custody from September 15-28. In June 2014, while participating in a discussion on an anti-superstition Bill in Bengaluru, Kalburgi had, in an effort to promote rational thinking, quoted an essay written by Ananthamurthy in the 1990s in which he claimed to have urinated on idols as a child without attracting retribution. The speech was deemed to be offensive to Hindu sentiments and a case was filed against Kalburgi and Ananthamurthy for hurting religious sentiments by a resident of Bengaluru in July 2014.
Over a year later, Kalburgi was murdered by two unidentified persons, who rode a motorcycle to his home. One of them rang the doorbell, asked for the scholar and shot him at close range, while the other waited on the motorcycle at the gate. Following Gauri Lankesh’s killing last year, forensic analysis of the cartridges and bullets revealed that one 7.65 mm countrymade pistol was used in both the Kalburgi and Gauri Lankesh murders.
In July this year, Miskin and Baddi were arrested by the SIT probing the Gauri Lankesh case after investigations revealed that they were part of a group of radical Hindu activists — many were linked to the Sanatan Sanstha and its affiliate, Hindu Janajagruti Samiti — who allegedly planned and executed the murder of the journalist in Bengaluru. Miskin, who worked in an incense stick manufacturing firm in Hubbali, is accused of taking Gauri Lankesh’s shooter to her house on a motorcycle, while Baddi, who worked as a goldsmith, is accused of facilitating the getaway after the murder.
In August, the SIT, in a report to the CID, indicated the likely role of Baddi and Miskin in the Kalburgi murder case — including the possibility of one of them being the shooter. The SIT also indicated that a former HJS activist, Amol Kale (37), who reportedly recruited the two youths among several others and provided arms training, was also possibly involved in the murder.
Some of the suspects arrested in the Gauri Lankesh case had earlier indicated that the journalist was targeted for her alleged “anti-Hindu’’ statements — including a 2012 speech in Mangaluru, which was re-circulated on social media in 2016, in which she said that Hinduism has no specific parentage and is merely an arrangement of social structure. Following the 2012 speech, a resident of Mangaluru had filed a case against Lankesh for hurting religious sentiments.
According to sources, a video of her speech was found on a computer in the possession of a suspect, Sujeet Kumar (38), a former activist of the Hindu Janajagruti Samiti, who was among those arrested for the journalist’s murder. The video was shown to youths recruited by the outfit to execute the murder, sources said.
Courtesy: indianexpress.com
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
CM Siddaramaiah alleges ‘criminal conspiracy’ in Sringeri recount, vows legal action
Bengaluru (PTI): Alleging a “criminal conspiracy” by BJP candidate D N Jeevaraj in the Sringeri Assembly poll recounting, Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah on Tuesday said the outcome was manipulated after valid postal ballot votes in favour of Congress leader T D Raje Gowda were tampered with during the recounting process.
Following a Karnataka High Court order on an election petition filed by Jeevaraj, challenging Raje Gowda’s election, the reverification and recounting were conducted on Saturday.
After the reverification and recount of postal ballots for the Sringeri Assembly constituency, votes polled in favour of Raje Gowda were reduced by 255, the returning officer said.
A report on the matter has been submitted to the Election Commission of India for further action, the officer added.
Congress leader Raje Gowda had won the 2023 Assembly polls from Sringeri by 201 votes, defeating his nearest rival Jeevaraj.
Addressing a press conference in Bengaluru, Siddaramaiah said the High Court had directed the recounting of postal ballots and that irregularities were noticed during the exercise conducted on May 2.
“This is a clear case of criminal conspiracy,” Siddaramaiah said, alleging that valid votes cast in favour of Raje Gowda were altered after being accepted by counting agents of all parties, including Congress, BJP, and JD(S).
He claimed that during the recounting of postal ballots, 255 votes were initially accepted as valid by all agents but were later tampered with by subordinate officials.
“There is a second mark on the votes polled in favour of Raje Gowda. They had accepted these as valid votes. Subsequently, another mark was made by officials. This is a clear case of criminal conspiracy,” he said.
When asked who was behind the alleged conspiracy, the CM replied, “It was hatched by Jeevaraj and others. It is planned.”
Siddaramaiah further alleged that the returning officer acted improperly by declaring the result despite the presence of an Election Commission observer during the recounting.
“Immediately after the counting, the returning officer announced the result. He should not have done so; this is against the law,” he said.
He pointed out that Raje Gowda had originally won by 201 votes, but after the recounting, the BJP candidate was declared the winner by 52 votes.
“The BJP has committed a criminal act of conspiracy. This is not vote chori but vote dacoity,” he alleged.
The CM said a police complaint had already been filed by Raje Gowda’s election agent, Sudhir Kumar, and emphasised the need for electoral integrity.
“We want transparency and free and fair elections. That is what our Constitution mandates,” he added.
Stating that the government would pursue legal remedies, Siddaramaiah said, “We are preparing an appeal challenging the returning officer’s announcement in a court of law.”
Responding to a separate query on elections in other states, the CM said there appeared to be an anti-incumbency factor in West Bengal, while results in Tamil Nadu were “surprising,” adding that Vijay’s party was emerging as the largest there.
Following the victory of party candidates in Bagalkote and Davanagere South, Siddaramaiah expressed confidence about future electoral prospects in Karnataka.
“Even in 2028, we will win the Assembly elections. We will come back,” the CM said.
Siddaramaiah added that he would order a forensic examination into the alleged tampering of postal ballots.
