Kerala Assembly passes unanimous resolution against SIR
Thiruvananthapuram(PTI): Kerala Assembly on Monday unanimously passed a resolution against the Election Commission of India (ECI)'s move to carry out the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voters' list in the state and urged the poll body to conduct the revision of voters' list in a transparent manner.
The Congress-led UDF opposition, which had already expressed their strong reservations against the SIR, backed the resolution in the House moved by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. In the resolution, the CM conveyed the concerns of the House about the "hasty move" by the ECI to implement the SIR and suspected "ill-motive" behind their action.
There are widespread concerns that the Election Commission's move to conduct SIR is a "backdoor" attempt to implement the National Register of Citizens (NRC), he pointed out.
The recent SIR process in Bihar confirms such concerns, he alleged, adding that it reflects "politics of exclusion."
Alleging that the SIR implemented in Bihar witnessed "illogical exclusions" of people from the voters' list, Vijayan said there is a suspicion across the country whether the same pattern is being pursued on a national basis.
In the resolution, the CM questioned the attempts being made to implement the SIR in poll-bound Kerala, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal while the constitutional validity of the Bihar SIR process is under consideration by the Supreme Court. It cannot be viewed as an innocent move, the Left veteran noted.
There are widespread fear that the attempt by the Election Commission to implement the SIR, that requires long-term preparation and consultation, in a hasty manner is to sabotage democracy, he said.
It casts a shadow of suspicion over the Commission, he added.
"The local body elections in Kerala are due to be held soon. The assembly elections will be held immediately after that. In this situation, it is ill-intentioned to conduct the SIR in a hurry," he said.
Prior to this, a thorough revision of the voter list was carried out in Kerala in 2002. It is "unscientific" that the present revision is to be conducted based on 2002, he said.
The SIR's requirement that those born after 1987 can vote only if they provide their father's or mother's citizenship certificate is a decision that undermines the country's adult franchise, he noted.
It is also stipulated that those born after 2003 can cast their vote only if they submit the citizenship documents of their father and mother, he said.
Expert studies in this regard showed that people from marginalised sections of society are excluded from the electoral rolls due to such provisions in the SIR, the resolution pointed out.
The vast majority of those excluded would be from minority communities, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, women, and those belonging to financially backward families, the CM further said.
Vijayan, in the resolution, also wanted to maintain the voting rights of non-resident voters in the electoral rolls.
He also expressed concerns about the possible use of the SIR by those who try to revive the Citizenship Amendment Act, which makes citizenship based on religion.
It is a challenge to democracy, the chief minister further said.
The Assembly unanimously demands that the Election Commission refrain from such practices that violate fundamental rights of people. It also demands to conduct the revision of voters' list in a transparent manner, the CM added.
After amendments suggested by some members, Speaker A N Shamseer announced that the House has unanimously passed the resolution.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
SC to hear pleas for reviewing wages of priests, temple staff
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on Monday a plea to constitute a judicial commission or an expert committee to review the wages and other benefits given to priests, 'sevadars' and temple staff in state-controlled temples.
A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta is likely to hear the PIL filed by advocate Ashwini Upadhyay.
The plea, filed through advocate Ashwani Dubey, seeks directions to the Centre and states to constitute a judicial commission or an expert committee to review the remuneration and other benefits given to the priests and temple staff in state-controlled temples.
"Petitioner also seeks a declaration that priests and temple staff are employee' under Section 2(k) of the Code on Wages, 2019. Petitioner submits that once the State assumes the administrative, economic and financial control over temples, an employer-employee relationship arises and denial of dignified wages to priests and temple staff violates the right to livelihood guaranteed under Article 21," it said.
Upadhyay said the cause of action accrued on April 4, when he went to Varanasi to attend a public programme and after performing 'Rudrabhishek' in the Kashi Vishwanath temple, which is controlled by the state, he came to know that even the minimum wages to live with dignity are not given to the priests and temple staff.
"Recently, in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, priests and temple staff organised a large-scale protest demanding the minimum wages. Priests and temple staff are not getting even the minimum wage prescribed by the State for unskilled and semi-skilled workers. This is a systemic exploitation. State is acting as a model employer through the endowments department, but violating the minimum wages Act and the directive principles of state policy (Article 43)," it said.
The plea further said the continued refusal to meet the minimum wages with the 2026 inflation-adjusted cost of living index has forced the petitioner to seek judicial intervention to prevent the further marginalisation of priests and temple staff.
Upadhyay further said the precarious nature of livelihood was starkly exposed on February 7, 2025, when a Tamil Nadu department issued a circular at the 'Dandayuthapani Swami Temple' in Madurai, strictly prohibiting priests from accepting 'dakshina' in 'aarti plates'.
"It is necessary to state that priests in such temples often receive no formal salary from the State and rely entirely on 'Dakshina'; the State's administrative order directly threatened them with starvation. Although withdrawn due to public outrage, the incident highlights the State's arbitrary power over the survival of the priests. This is also a bitter truth that States are controlling lakhs of temples but not a single mosque or church," the PIL claimed.
The petition, alternatively, sought direction to the Centre and states to take appropriate steps for the welfare of priests, sevadars and other temple staff in the spirit of the Allahabad High Court's earlier judgments.
