Palnadu (Andhra Pradesh), Nov 5: Amid a legal tussle between Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy and Y S Sharmila over the transfer of shares of Saraswati power company, Andhra Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan on Tuesday visited the site where the firm was expected to come up and alleged that lands were snatched away from farmers and Dalits for this enterprise.
However, the YSRCP claimed Kalyan's allegations as diversion politics in the face of rising atrocities against women and allegedly failing law and order situation in the southern state.
The Deputy CM alleged that farmers were threatened with petrol bombs and their lands were grabbed for this company.
"Former chief minister's family members (Jagan & Sharmila) were feuding between themselves over these (lands) as if they were their family property," said Kalyan, addressing a public meeting at Vemavaram village in Palnadu district.
Farmers parted with their lands with the hope that their family members would get jobs, Kalyan said, and added that it did not happen.
Kalyan claimed that the process to procure land for Saraswati power began during the tenure of the late chief minister Y S Rajasekhar Reddy, resulting in the pooling of 1,184 acres which included 24 acres of assigned land belonging to Dalits, which cannot be sold, as well as over 400 acres of forest land.
He stated that the YSR family owns 86 per cent of Saraswati power, and described it as a family asset.
Kalyan alleged that the land was acquired for a pittance under the pretext of providing employment but they failed to fulfil that promise.
He criticised Jagan Mohan Reddy for discussing class warfare while allegedly grabbing lands belonging to Dalits.
Kalyan also announced that he had instructed officials to prepare a comprehensive report on the land parcels vis-a-vis Saraswati power.
He said leases were obtained from the government in 2009 for 30 years and subsequently these were extended to 50 years in 2019 after Jagan Mohan Reddy assumed office as chief minister.
Also, Kalyan claimed that permissions were secured to source 196 crore litres of water from the Krishna River for the company (which is yet to commence its operations).
Kalyan said that he would raise the issue in the Cabinet meeting and ensure a thorough investigation for further action.
Meanwhile, YSRCP leader K Mahesh Reddy strongly objected to Kalyan's visit and termed his outreach as diversion politics as the NDA government allegedly failed to maintain law and order in the state and when 'atrocities on women are growing'.
"Pawan Kalyan coming to Palnadu should have been for some development activity but he singled out Saraswathi Cements (Power) and has been giving unfounded statements with malafide intention and to divert the attention of people from the failures of the government," said Reddy in a release.
Asserting that Jagan Mohan Reddy had purchased those lands before entering politics, the YSRCP leader claimed that there were delays in setting up the plant as some state governments were allegedly non cooperative and 'foisted false cases against him (Jagan)'.
Questioning the motive behind Kalyan singling out Saraswati Power and leaving out others, he alleged that it exposes the vindictiveness of the NDA government.
According to Reddy, Jagan Mohan Reddy had 'bought' lands in Machavaram area, which was affected by naxalism, after peace talks. Then industries started coming to that region and raised employment hopes for locals. However, he claimed that the government of that day had denied and delayed permissions which were later 'rectified and the lease was renewed'.
"There is no point in Pawan Kalyan singling out the Saraswathi project other than to divert the attention of people from the flak it has been facing due to his comments and the failure of law and order situation," he added.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Jerusalem, Nov 5: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday dismissed his popular defence minister, Yoav Gallant, in a surprise announcement that came as the country is embroiled in wars on multiple fronts across the region.
Netanyahu and Gallant have repeatedly been at odds over the war in Gaza. But Netanyahu had avoided firing his rival. Netanyahu cited “significant gaps” and a “crisis of trust” between the men in his Tuesday evening announcement.
“In the midst of a war, more than ever, full trust is required between the prime minister and defence minister,” Netanyahu said. “Unfortunately, although in the first months of the campaign there was such trust and there was very fruitful work, during the last months this trust cracked between me and the defence minister.”
In the early days of the war, Israel's leadership presented a unified front as it responded to Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack. But as the war dragged on and spread to Lebanon, key policy differences have emerged. While Netanyahu has called for continued military pressure on Hamas, Gallant had taken a more pragmatic approach, saying that military force has created the necessary conditions for a diplomatic deal that could bring home hostages held by the Hamas group.
Gallant, a former general who has gained public respect with a gruff, no-nonsense personality, said in a statement: “The security of the state of Israel always was, and will always remain, my life's mission."
Gallant has worn a simple, black buttoned shirt throughout the war in a sign of sorrow over the October 7 attack and developed a strong relationship with his US counterpart, Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin.
A previous attempt by Netanyahu to fire Gallant in March 2023 sparked widespread street protests against Netanyahu. He also flirted with the idea of dismissing Gallant over the summer but held off until Tuesday's announcement.
Gallant will be replaced by Foreign Minister Israel Katz, a Netanyahu loyalist and veteran Cabinet minister who was a junior officer in the military. Gideon Saar, a former Netanyahu rival who recently rejoined the government, will take the foreign affairs post.
Netanyahu has a long history of neutralising his rivals. In his statement, he claimed he had made “many attempts” to bridge the gaps with Gallant.
“But they kept getting wider. They also came to the knowledge of the public in an unacceptable way, and worse than that, they came to the knowledge of the enemy - our enemies enjoyed it and derived a lot of benefit from it,” he said.