N Ram criticizes Shashi Tharoor for defending BJP government’s role in India-Pakistan ceasefire
New Delhi:
In a recent post on X (formerly Twitter), N Ram, the Director of The Hindu Publishing Group and former Editor-in-Chief of The Hindu, took aim at Congress MP Shashi Tharoor for his comments defending the BJP-led government’s handling of the India-Pakistan ceasefire and the role played by the United States in mediating peace between the two countries. N Ram, a veteran journalist known for his insightful commentary on political issues, criticized Tharoor’s statements made during an interview with Karan Thapar on The Wire, accusing him of acting as an apologist for the government. He raised concerns about Tharoor’s alignment with the ruling party’s narrative, particularly when the Congress Party itself is questioning the government’s actions.
In his tweet, N Ram remarked, "Watch Shashi Tharoor, grilled by Karan Thapar, emerge as the principal spokesman of, and the leading apologist for, the BJP government with respect to what might have led to the ceasefire between India and Pakistan and what the Trump administration’s role might have been in this regard. At a time when Congress leaders and elected representatives are asking questions and demanding answers from the Government, Tharoor’s smug assertions and ‘educated guesses’ seem calculated to make his party squirm. Are we missing something political here?"
N Ram's post highlights the growing divide within the Congress Party, where Tharoor’s comments seem to contradict the party’s stance on national security and diplomatic matters. The political establishment has been particularly vocal in its calls for the government to explain its role in the sudden ceasefire between India and Pakistan, especially regarding its interactions with the United States.
During his appearance on The Wire, Tharoor made a series of comments that appeared to support the government’s handling of the India-Pakistan ceasefire, despite the controversy surrounding it. In a conversation with Karan Thapar, Tharoor emphasized the role of the United States under President Donald Trump in facilitating diplomatic talks between India and Pakistan.
Tharoor began by explaining that while India and Pakistan have a long history of hostility, the sudden ceasefire could have been influenced by several factors, including diplomatic efforts by global powers. According to Tharoor, the Trump administration’s “shuttle diplomacy” was aimed at creating a window for dialogue, and it was “entirely possible” that this external pressure contributed to the ceasefire agreement.
Tharoor also expressed the view that the US administration was interested in bringing stability to the region, not just for the benefit of South Asia but also to improve its own geopolitical positioning. He suggested that the Trump administration may have seen an opportunity to exert influence over India and Pakistan, which both had strategic significance in the context of the US-China rivalry.
Tharoor speculated that the ceasefire could have been influenced by operations like Sindoor, which might have led Pakistan to reconsider its stance.
Tharoor further explained that while the Indian government had not publicly discussed the specifics of these operations, their potential impact on the security dynamics between India and Pakistan should not be dismissed. In his view, the government’s strategic approach towards Pakistan, including the use of intelligence and covert operations, might have been part of a broader diplomatic effort to ensure stability in the region.
Tharoor’s remarks during the interview have triggered sharp reactions from within the Congress Party, with several leaders questioning his approach. While the Congress has been critical of the BJP government on various national and international fronts, Tharoor’s defense of the government’s role in the ceasefire has raised eyebrows. Several party members have expressed discomfort with his tone and the seeming alignment with the ruling party, particularly on sensitive issues like national security.
Tharoor's defense of the government’s approach to India-Pakistan relations, as well as his suggestions regarding the US mediation, has sparked criticism within the Congress party. His remarks, which seemed to align with the BJP’s official stance, have led to accusations that Tharoor is acting as an apologist for the ruling party, despite being a senior leader in the opposition.
At a time when Congress leaders are demanding accountability from the government regarding its handling of the ceasefire and its engagement with global powers, Tharoor’s comments appear to have put him at odds with the party’s official stance. His remarks also prompted questions about his political positioning, as many believe that such statements could undermine the opposition’s efforts to hold the government accountable.
The fallout from Tharoor’s comments has not only raised questions within the Congress Party but also sparked political discussions about his position within the opposition. Critics have accused him of “softening” his stance on the government, while others suggest that his remarks could be a calculated attempt to maintain a more balanced and diplomatic approach in his public persona.
Tharoor’s intellectual approach to foreign policy and diplomacy has often set him apart from the more populist elements within the Congress Party. However, his recent remarks have led to questions about whether his views are evolving or whether he is consciously distancing himself from the party’s traditional stance.
With Congress leaders demanding clearer answers from the government, Tharoor’s comments may have added a layer of complexity to the ongoing debate about India’s approach to Pakistan and its relationships with global powers like the United States.
The Congress Party has yet to officially comment on Tharoor's statements, but the controversy has added fuel to the growing division over his political alignment and public stance on sensitive national and international issues.
Watch Shashi Tharoor, grilled by Karan Thapar, emerge as the principal spokesman of, and the leading apologist for, the BJP government with respect to what might have led to the ceasefire between India and Pakistan and what the Trump administration’s role might have been in this…
— N. Ram (@nramind) May 12, 2025
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
UDF leaders see local body poll trends as pointer to 2026 Assembly elections in Kerala
Thiruvananthapuram (PTI): Buoyed by the strong performance of the Congress-led UDF in the local body polls, KPCC president Sunny Joseph said on Saturday that the front's results indicated the people had rejected the LDF government.
According to early trends, the UDF was leading in more grama panchayats, block panchayats, municipalities and corporations than the LDF.
The local body polls were held in two phases in the state earlier this week.
ALSO READ: Cong candidate who moved Kerala HC for name reinstatement in voter list, wins
Speaking to reporters here, Joseph said the people of Kerala had extended their support to the UDF.
"We could expose the LDF government’s anti-people stance and the people understood it. The LDF’s fake propaganda was rejected by the people. The UDF is moving towards a historic victory," he said.
He said a united effort, proper preparations, good candidate selection and hard work had resulted in the Congress and the UDF’s victory in the elections.
Asked about the prospects in the Thiruvananthapuram Corporation, Joseph said the party was studying the matter and would comment later.
LDF convenor T P Ramakrishnan said the results would be closely examined.
According to him, the government had done everything possible for the people.
"Why such a verdict happened will be examined at the micro level. People’s opinion will be considered and further steps will be taken," he said.
He added that decisions would be taken after analysing the results. "If any corrective measures are required, we will initiate them and move forward," he said.
AICC leader K C Venugopal said the results showed that people had begun ousting those who, he alleged, were responsible for the loss of gold at Lord Ayyappa’s temple.
"This trend will continue in the Assembly elections as well. It is an indication that the people are ready to bring down the LDF government," he said.
Venugopal said the UDF had registered victories even in CPI(M) and LDF strongholds.
"I congratulate all UDF workers for their hard work. Congress workers and leaders worked unitedly," he said.
Referring to remarks made by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan against the Congress on polling day, Venugopal said the voters had responded through the verdict.
"I do not know whether the chief minister understands that the people are against him. Otherwise, he does not know the sentiment of the people. The state government cannot move an inch further," he said.
He said the results indicated a strong comeback for the UDF in Kerala.
Asked whether the Sabarimala gold loss issue had affected the LDF in the local polls, Venugopal said the CM and the CPI(M) state secretary did not take the issue seriously.
"We took a strong stand on the matter. The BJP played a foul game in it," he alleged.
On the BJP's role in the local body elections, Venugopal alleged that the party operated with the CPI(M) 's tacit support.
"The CPI(M) supported the central government on issues such as PM-SHRI, labour codes and corruption in national highway construction. The CPI(M) is facing ideological decline, and the state government’s policies are against the party’s own decisions," he said.
Meanwhile, LDF ally Kerala Congress (M) leader Jose K Mani said the party could not win all the wards it had expected in the elections.
He congratulated winners from all parties and said the party would closely examine the losses and identify shortcomings. "Later, we will take corrective measures," he added.
Senior Congress leader and MP Rajmohan Unnithan said the trends in the local body elections indicated that the UDF would return to power in the 2026 Assembly elections.
"We will win 111 seats as in 1977 and return to power in 2026. The anti-government sentiment of the people is reflected in the elections," he said.
Unnithan said the people were disturbed and unhappy with the present government.
"The trend indicates the end of the LDF government," he added.
CPI(M) MLA M M Mani said the people had shown ingratitude towards the LDF despite benefiting from welfare schemes.
"After receiving all welfare schemes and living comfortably, people voted against us due to some temporary sentiments. Is that not ingratitude," he asked.
Mani said no such welfare initiatives had taken place in Kerala earlier.
"People are receiving pensions and have enough to eat. Even after getting all this, they voted against us. This is what can be called ingratitude," he said.
Muslim League state president Panakkad Sayyid Sadiq Ali Shihab Thangal said the results were beyond expectations.
"The outcome points towards the Secretariat in Thiruvananthapuram, indicating that a change of government is imminent. We are going to win the Assembly election," he said.
