Never shared Indian users' data with third parties: Paytm
New Delhi, May 26: Digital wallet payment company Paytm on Saturday refuted media reports that it has shared user data to third parties, saying that the data of its 300 million registered users is safe in India.
"There is a video going around on social media and it falsely claims that we shared some data with 3rd parties. Nothing can be further from the truth," the company wrote in a blog post.
"We never share your data with anyone: any company/ any government or any country. At Paytm, your data is yours. Not ours, or of a third party, or of the government."
Paytm reiterated that their policy allows only legally compliant data requests from the "law of the land" to get access to data for necessary investigations.
"You can be sure that no data is shared with anyone whom you would not have given us permission to share it with. This is the holy grail of trust between us.
"Any person claiming otherwise is not aware of the policy and is not authorised to speak on behalf of the company," the company said.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
SC criticizes UP govt services commission for questions with ambiguous set of answers
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has slammed the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Services Selection Commission (UPSSSC) for having set certain questions with ambiguous choices as answers for the Revenue Lekhpal examination for 2021-2022 and has directed the Commission to re-evaluate the answer sheets.
The bench consisting of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K Vinod Chandran has also said that the ambiguity in the answers has affected the outcome for over 8,000 candidates who had competed for 8,085 vacancies, reports LiveLaw.
The judges further resolved the ambiguities in three major questions from Booklet Series B.
The question on the location from where Mahatma Gandhi started the Salt Satyagraha gave options of Dandi, Surat, Sabarmati and Pawnar. The bench pointed out that the site of violation of the salt law was Dandi from a purely technical point of view. The official position in considering it the right answer was correct. The judges added that the Satyagraha commenced from Sabarmati, and therefore could also be considered as correct although not technically so. They said that the candidates who opt for either of the above answers should be given full marks.
The bench also gave directions related to the longest national highway in Uttar Pradesh, stating that, as the numbers had changed with time, two answers could be considered correct. Thirdly, it referred to the eligibility of farmers to get subsidy under the solar photovoltaic irrigation pump scheme and clarified that two answers were correct due to the changes in the policy implemented by the government.
The judges chastised the UPSSSC for the ambiguous and unclear questions it had set and stressed that the lapses proved to be highly disadvantageous for the candidates. They also directed the Commission to award appropriate marks to the affected candidates while protecting those who had been selected, to avoid disruption in the recruitment process.
