‘Police firing was pre-planned’: Thoothukudi residents were warned against rally
New Delhi, May 25: The tremor in his voice is evident as Godwin Jose begins to recount the horror of police firing in the protest rally against Sterlite on May 22. The 23-year-old from Sorispuram in Thoothukudi was among the tens of thousands of people who had gathered to take out the rally which ended with bloody violence leaving at 11 dead and several injured.
“The police opened fire when we tried to enter the Collectorate. So, we stepped away and sat somewhere outside. That was when there was a lathicharge too. Fearing lathicharge, we entered the Collectorate again, and there was shooting again,” Godwin says.
Godwin has no shred of doubt that the firing was pre-planned. “It looked as if the police were singling out those who were vocal, those who led the protests, and shot them above the abdomen,” he says.
“There was of course indiscriminate shooting, too, and many of us were hurt in the legs. But there were several rounds of fire, and we could see they were picking the targets at times. Thamizharasan, for example, was very active in the protest for quite some time. He has been shot dead. When you target the organisers and kill them, it is evident you want to kill the protest,” Godwin says.
Henry Tiphagne, executive director of People’s Watch, couldn’t agree more. “It was certainly planned and intended at quelling the protests,” he says.
On May 20, the district administration had called for a peace committee meeting in which over 20 organisations including traders’ associations and fishermen associations had participated. At this meeting, warnings were given against participating in the rally.
“We were advised against the protest rally in the meeting. The administration warned us against taking out a rally, since there were chances that it could turn violent. All of us agreed to hold a call-attention protest on a playground that was earmarked for us, and signed an agreement to that effect,” says S Raja of Tamil Nadu Vanigar Sangam (Traders Association). But the agreement did not go down well with many other protestors.
Henry says that people were also kept in the dark about the peace meeting and imposition of section 144. “Many villagers were in fact not informed of this agreement,” Henry says.
“Even when the collector issued Section 144 the previous day, it was not done the way it has to be. Normally when 144 is issued, there is a mike announcement made in the area. But in this case, there were no announcements. The people were still thinking the protest march was on,” Henry points out, “When the peace committee was a sham and there were no announcements, then how can the administration expect us to believe this was not planned?”
He adds that it is an abject failure on the part of central and state intelligence. “If the administration was really serious about finding a solution, they should have invited everyone who had a stake in the protest to the peace committee meeting. The Collector called only those he thought were protesters. The administration might have its own differences with an organisation like Makkal Adhikaram, but it is not fair that they were kept out of the peace committee meeting,” Henry explains.
Godwin says the administration’s advice to hold a call-attention protest was itself a strategy to dilute the protest. “We have been protesting for 100 days. We still couldn’t attract the attention of the administration or the government. How could the government have paid any attention on the 100th day alone?” he asks. Godwin also says the cops tracked down many protesters and had them arrested throughout the day.
This is not the first time that the TN police have attempted to put down a protest using force. In September 2012, a year after protests erupted against the Kudankulam nuclear power plant, the police opened fire against the protesters, killing one fisherman in the process. The week-long protests for jallikattu at Chennai’s Marina Beach in January 2017 culminated in violence, after a clash between the police and protesters.
“Every time the police decide to use force to put down a protest, they begin to say that protesters resorted to violence. From Kudankulam to Marina and Sterlite, the protests have always remained peaceful till the police reach the scene. So, who is to blame?” asks G Sundarrajan of Poovulagin Nanbargal.
Henry Tiphagne says the police had intended the protest to end the way the jallikattu protests did. “Their idea was to kill the protests. They have used brute force for that. The administration should realise a permanent solution will only be to shut Sterlite down,” he says.
courtesy : thenewsminute.com
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Karnataka HM G Parameshwara blames EVM for Cong debacle in Maharashtra, backs ballot papers
BENGALURU: Karnataka home minister G Parameshwara on Monday alleged Electronic Voting Machine manipulations led to the defeat of Maha Vikas Aghadi alliance in just concluded assembly polls in Maharashtra.
While speaking to reporters here on Monday, he said the BJP does selective manipulations to convince people that there were no wrongdoings. He also wanted to go back to the paper ballots system.
The ruling BJP-led Mahayuti alliance in Maharashtra won a landslide victory in the assembly elections, shattering the Congress-led Maha Vikas Aghadi's dream to wrest power. The BJP won the highest ever 132 seats for the party, while the Shiv Sena led by Shinde bagged 57 seats and NCP won 41 seats to take the Mahayuti total to 230 seats. Congress as part of MVA won just 16 seats.
ALSO READ: Fan tries to die by suicide over Nikhil Kumaraswamy's bypoll loss
"We analysed the Maharashtra poll outcome deeply. We felt that in many places EVMs were manipulated," Parameshwara said. He also said an obvious question would be why not it happened in Jharkhand and elsewhere. The manipulations are done selectively so that no one can question it, he blamed.
According to him, Jharkhand Mukti Morcha is a leading partner. Had the Congress been the leading partner, things would have changed. He backed the ballot papers saying that the same was discussed in Maharashtra Congress as well.
