New Delhi: Pune is the best governed city in India, Bengaluru-based advocacy group Janaagraha Centre for Citizenship and Democracy has said in a report. The civic bodies of Kolkata and Thiruvananthapuram round off the top three in the Annual Survey of India’s City-Systems, which evaluated the quality of governance in 23 cities based on 89 questions. Bengaluru, Chandigarh, Dehradun, Patna and Chennai comprise the bottom five.

 Activists in Pune, however, questioned the ranking, the Hindustan Times reported. Nagrik Chetna Manch president, Major General SCN Jatar (retired) said the survey was not based on reality. “Pune rivers have become sewage canals and we have encroachments on green zones,” he said. “The city is drenched in garbage. Has the governance elevated the life of the common man?”

 Lawyer Sarang Yadwadkar pointed out that the survey does not measure the quality of infrastructure and services, but instead focuses on the preparedness of cities to deliver high quality infrastructure and services in the long run.

 The survey, however, said that most of the cities are “grossly underprepared” to deliver such a high quality of life even in the future. “Overall, India’s cities have continued to score low over the last three editions of ASICS, with average score improving marginally from 3.4 to 3.9,” the advocacy group observed. “This indicates slow progress on fixing City-Systems. This is particularly worrisome, given the pace at which India is urbanising and the already poor state of public service delivery in our cities.”

 Policy-makers and urban planners need to address five systemic problems to deliver a better quality of life to citizens in a sustainable manner, Janaagraha said. Most cities lack a modern planning framework for public utilities such as roads, footpaths, bus stops and other utilities, the report pointed out. The city authorities’ weak finances and poor human resource management also hamper their development, the advocacy group said. It also spoke of the political paralysis in most civic bodies that render mayors powerless, and the complete absence of platforms where citizens can have their say in the city’s governance.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi: Yoga guru Baba Ramdev has sharply criticised the United States and Israel over their conflict with Iran, in a video from a television interview that has gone viral on social media.

Speaking on a show aired by ABP News, Ramdev was asked whether India should support Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who was reported to have been killed on the first day of the war on February 28.

Responding to the question, Ramdev said, “You can kill a person, but you cannot kill his ideas, his philosophy, his mindset, his spirit, or his valour and heroism.”

He went on to express support for Iran, saying he may not know much about the country but believes its people cannot be subdued. Referring to the Shia Muslim community, he said no one could make them “bow down” or defeat them, adding that a significant section of Iran’s population strongly identifies with Khamenei’s ideology.

When asked about Netanyahu, Ramdev criticised both him and US President Donald Trump, saying they are “both cut from the same cloth.” He added, “I am not calling anyone a thief; I am simply citing a proverb it implies that they are both of the same ilk, and I consider them both to be war criminals. I consider them criminals against humanity; I consider them criminals against nature and the environment.”

He further said that the United States and Israel have “erected a Himalaya-sized mountain of political mistrust” and claimed that both countries would have to face the consequences for decades. “In this conflict, neither can America and Israel emerge victorious, nor can Iran be defeated,” he said.

Ramdev’s remarks come at a time when India’s position on the conflict has drawn attention. The government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has maintained what it describes as “strategic autonomy” in foreign policy.