Ramachandra Guha compares his freedom to Umar Khalid’s incarceration, asks why justice delayed
Disclaimer: The following report is based on historian Ramachandra Guha’s opinion piece titled A Life Aborted, published in The Telegraph on November 1, 2025.
Noted historian and author Ramachandra Guha, in his latest artcicle A Life Aborted published in The Telegraph on November 1, 2025, reflected on the academic brilliance of jailed scholar Umar Khalid and the tragic halt to his scholarly career due to his continued imprisonment.
Guha began by recalling his own early research as a historian of forest communities under British colonial rule and how, despite moving to different subjects over the years, he continues to remain attached to that field. He said he recently read a doctoral thesis that impressed him a work on the social and environmental history of what is now Jharkhand.
The thesis, Guha noted, focused on the transformation of Adivasi society in Singhbhum during British colonial rule. It examined how the East India Company took control of the territory and how colonialism reshaped its natural landscape, legal framework, and political and economic systems. The research explored themes such as the commercial orientation of British forest policy, the changing role of local village headmen, and the responses of Adivasi communities to the sweeping changes brought by colonial power.
The scholar, Guha wrote, also paid close attention to intellectual history, offering thoughtful readings of both British officials and Indian anthropologists who studied Singhbhum’s tribal societies.
He went on to list six qualities that made the work stand out:
A strong grasp of previous scholarship – The researcher had a command over writings on Adivasis across India, whether from well-known or obscure authors.
Extensive use of primary sources – The thesis was based on archival work in national, state, and district records, as well as in old essays and books over a century old.
Commitment to fieldwork – The historian had personally visited the area, following Marc Bloch’s advice that a historian needs both thicker boots and thicker notebooks.
Effective use of quotations – The thesis included vivid quotes that brought history alive. One British officer’s account of a forest hunt depicted local tribes dancing, singing, and carrying traditional weapons. Another quote, from a century later during the Non-Cooperation Movement, showed how nationalist sentiment had reached the tribal heartland.
Clarity in writing – Guha praised the author for his simple and powerful language, free from academic jargon.
Balanced argumentation – The scholar avoided the usual stereotypes about tribal life, instead showing how Adivasi communities had diverse responses to colonialism. Some resisted the state, some cooperated, while others used the new system to improve their standing within their own societies.
Guha also pointed out that while the thesis was outstanding, it was not without flaws. It missed certain important secondary sources, such as the works of T.N. Madan on Indian anthropology, and could have included more folklore and oral histories. He also felt that some primary source quotes were unnecessarily long and weakened the narrative.
Despite these minor issues, Guha described it as one of the finest doctoral dissertations he had read by an Indian scholar. He observed that works of such quality often get published as books within a few years of submission, citing examples such as Subalterns and Sovereigns by Nandini Sundar and Fencing the Forest by Mahesh Rangarajan, both of which emerged from doctoral research.
He added that other historians like Bhavani Raman, Aditya Balasubramanian, Nikhil Menon, and Dinyar Patel also saw their doctoral dissertations turn into acclaimed books soon after completion.
Guha then revealed that the remarkable thesis he was praising had been submitted in 2018 by Dr Umar Khalid. However, despite its merit, it has not yet been published as a book because its author has been in prison for more than five years without bail or formal charges.
Guha stated that he has never met Umar Khalid but recalled that both of them had participated in separate peaceful protests in December 2019 against what he described as a discriminatory law, Khalid in Delhi and Guha in Bengaluru. Reflecting on the contrast between their lives since then, Guha wondered if his freedom to continue research and writing was because his name is Ramachandra and not Umar.
Towards the end of the piece, Guha broadened his reflection beyond Khalid, pointing out that many upright Indians scholars, activists, and social workers are facing prolonged imprisonment on questionable charges filed by authorities acting under political pressure. These individuals, he said, have always stood for non-violence and upheld the core values of the Indian Constitution, yet find themselves targeted by what he called “authoritarian and majoritarian tendencies of the ruling regime.”
He lamented that these individuals are spending the best years of their lives behind bars when they could be contributing to the progress of the Republic. Guha concluded his column by urging the judiciary to show both decency and courage to restore their freedom.
Disclaimer: The above report is based entirely on historian Ramachandra Guha’s article A Life Aborted, published in The Telegraph on November 1, 2025.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Karnataka issues nutrition advisory for govt events; recommends millets, healthier options
_vb_61.jpeg)
Bengaluru (PTI): The Karnataka government on Monday issued a nutrition advisory recommending healthier food and beverage options at meetings, functions, and other official gatherings held in the state.
The advisory has been issued by the Department of Karnataka Health and Family Welfare Services to promote healthy dietary and nutritional habits among officials and staff, noting that food, refreshments and beverages served in government offices and official programmes are "often not aligned with nutrition standards."
The advisory recommends serving snacks such as millet-based, low-fat and low-sugar foods, fresh fruits, vegetable salads, sprouts, roasted nuts and seeds during in-house office meetings and breaks.
Beverages such as green tea, low-fat buttermilk, and locally filtered or boiled water served in glass bottles or steel flasks have also been suggested.
According to the advisory, for larger government events, conferences and exhibitions, departments have been advised to include at least one millet-based item during snacks and a minimum of two millet dishes in meals, along with local cuisine and at least one regional recipe.
It also recommends the use of brown rice instead of white rice, freshly prepared vegetable salads, and fresh fruits or low-sugar fruit juices.
If non-vegetarian food is served, it should consist of well-cooked lean or white meat, the advisory stated.
In eateries operating within government office campuses, the department has recommended millet-based foods, fresh vegetable salads, boiled pulses such as horse gram or chickpeas, and low-fat beverages.
It suggests serving food using reusable metal plates and glasses.
The advisory also recommends avoiding microwave-heated food, industrially processed food, fried snacks, high-fat or heavily spiced dishes, carbonated drinks, high-sugar fruit juices, and alcoholic beverages.
It further discourages serving milk-based tea or coffee and plastic-bottled water during official events.
“Overall, hygiene and cleanliness should be maintained while serving food and water. Local cottage industries, self-help groups, prison kitchens, nutri-gardens and others should be preferred for placing food and beverage orders,” the advisory added.
_vb_54.jpeg)
_vb_07.jpeg)
_vb_34.jpeg)