Shashi Tharoor defends his article on Kerala's growth following criticism from UDF
_vb_59.jpeg)
Thiruvananthapuram (PTI): Defending his recent article in an English daily that stirred a political controversy, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has clarified that not highlighting the industrial advancements made during the previous UDF regime was not intentional.
In a late-night Facebook post in Malayalam, he said: "The main focus of my article was the figures presented by the current Industry Minister, who stated that the CPI(M)’s general policy had not been industrial investment-friendly and has undergone changes."
Tharoor's clarification came in response to the political storm triggered by his article, in which he praised Kerala's entrepreneurial growth under the LDF government. While his party questioned the basis of his claims, the CPI(M) welcomed them.
The Congress-led UDF strongly flayed Tharoor, accusing him of "overlooking" the industrial sector's achievements during its tenure in the state.
In his post, he stated that some have noted that his article has not referred to the technological advancements made during the previous Oommen Chandy government. "This omission was unintentional," he said.
The post added that the article was about whether the current CPI(M)-led government has shifted its approach to technology and industrial growth over the years and whether these changes have benefited Kerala.
Tharoor also praised the UDF, stating that under the leadership of P K Kunhalikutty, who handled the Industry and Information Technology portfolios in the previous Oommen Chandy government, Kerala witnessed significant achievements and substantial growth.
The state's first Global Investors Meet (GIM) was also held during the A K Antony government under the leadership of P K Kunhalikutty, the post noted.
Leader of Opposition in the Kerala assembly V D Satheesan sparked the debate on the issue on Saturday by questioning the basis for Tharoor's article and later Congress general secretary K C Venugopal too sought to know the context behind the Thiruvananthapuram MP's statements.
Tharoor responded to Satheesan's queries by remarking that the opposition leader should read the article and added that he wrote it based on the "facts, documents, figures and dates" as well as the Global Startup Ecosystem report and "Kerala's performance".
As the Congress questioned the basis for Tharoor's article, the CPI(M) came to his defence by saying that the MP from Thiruvananthapuram only stated facts.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Trump’s fresh threat to bomb Iran amid reports of deal to end war
Washington (PTI): US President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened Iran with more bombing if it doesn't reopen the Strait of Hormuz, amid a report that the warring sides were nearing an agreement to end the war.
US media outlet Axios reported, quoting US officials and two other sources, that the US and Iran were getting close to a one-page memorandum of understanding to end the war and set a framework for more detailed nuclear negotiations.
The US expects Iranian responses on several key points over the next 48 hours, Axios reported, adding that nothing has been agreed yet. This was the closest the parties had been to an agreement since the war began.
"Assuming Iran agrees to give what has been agreed to, which is, perhaps, a big assumption, the already legendary Epic Fury will be at an end, and the highly effective Blockade will allow the Hormuz Strait to be OPEN TO ALL, including Iran," Trump said in a post on Truth Social.
"If they don’t agree, the bombing starts, and it will be, sadly, at a much higher level and intensity than it was before," Trump said.
According to Axios, the deal would involve Iran committing to a moratorium on nuclear enrichment, the US agreeing to lift its sanctions and release billions in frozen Iranian funds, and both sides lifting restrictions around transit through the Strait of Hormuz.
It said many of the terms laid out in the memo would be contingent on a final agreement being reached, leaving the possibility of renewed war or an extended limbo in which the hot war has stopped, but nothing is truly resolved.
