Karnataka Legislative Assembly Speaker UT Khader inaugurated the 13th Indian Students’ Parliament at Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University in Pune. The conference witnessed the participation of over three thousand students from various parts of the country.

Addressing the gathering, Speaker Khader spoke about the role students play in shaping the future of the nation. He added that students have the potential to make the country a global power

He highlighted the abundant youth population in India, describing it as a unique asset. With millions of male and female students studying in thousands of colleges across the country, Khader emphasized their crucial role in leading India forward. ]

In the competitive nature of today's world, he urged students to showcase the way forward through innovative and creative ideas.

Khader acknowledged the era of artificial intelligence but stressed that it could never match human thinking, creativity, and emotions. Despite advancements in science and technology, the human role in these developments continues to increase rather than decrease. He urged students to recognize this fact, and realize the significance of human input in the age of artificial intelligence.

While acknowledging the positive use of social media, Khader cautioned against letting it control individuals. He concluded by stating that the future of the country rests in the hands of the students, encouraging them to be mindful of their role in shaping a progressive and responsible society.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Chennai: Journalist and political commentator Sujit Nair has expressed concern over speculation that the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam could explore a post-poll understanding to prevent Vijay-led Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam from forming the government in Tamil Nadu.

In a social media post, Sujit Nair said the election verdict in Tamil Nadu reflected a clear public demand for political change and argued that the mandate should be respected irrespective of political preferences.

Referring to reports and political discussions surrounding a possible understanding between the DMK and AIADMK, he said he hoped such developments remained only speculative conversations and did not turn into reality.

Nair stated that if such an alliance were to take shape, it would raise serious questions about ideological politics in the country. He said TVK had emerged through a democratic electoral process and that the legitimacy to govern in a parliamentary democracy comes from the people’s verdict.

According to him, attempts to prevent an electoral winner from forming the government through unexpected political arrangements may be constitutionally valid, but many people could view them as politically opportunistic.

He further said that such a move could particularly affect the political image of the DMK, which has historically projected itself around ideology, social justice and opposition politics. Nair said that in ideological terms, the DMK appeared closer to TVK than to the AIADMK, and joining hands with its long-time political rival only to remain in power could weaken its broader political narrative.

He added that the same questions would apply to the AIADMK as well, as the party had spent decades positioning itself against the DMK and such an arrangement could create discomfort among its cadre and supporters.

Drawing a comparison with Maharashtra politics in 2019, Nair said he had expressed similar views when the Shiv Sena formed an alliance with the Indian National Congress and the Nationalist Congress Party after the Assembly elections.

He said post-poll alliances between long-standing political rivals often create a public perception that ideology and electoral mandates become secondary when political power equations come into play.

Nair also said such developments increase public cynicism towards politics and reinforce the belief among voters that ideology is often sidelined after elections.

He maintained that the Tamil Nadu verdict was emphatic and said respecting both the spirit and substance of the mandate was important for the credibility of democratic politics.