New Delhi : The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its verdict in the case on decriminalising Section 377 of the Indian Penal code (IPC). This was after counsels from parties concluded their arguments.
The five-member Constitutional bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, heard the arguments through the last week.
In the course of the hearings, the Centre told the apex court that it will not take a stand on the criminalisation of same-sex relationship. It told the court that it will "leave it to the wisdom of the court" to decide upon the matter.
On Tuesday, submitting his arguments, senior advocate K Radhakrishnan said prevalence of HIV will increase in the country if Section 377 IPC is struck down by the court. He added that such a move will also make India lose its nobility, character and virtuousness.
To this, the bench, which also comprises of Justices RF Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, said are sexually-transmitted diseases not prevalent among heterosexual couples?
Suresh Kumar Koushal's lawyer argued that a law should not be struck down just because it affects a handful of people. In 2013, Koushal had successfully challenged the Delhi High Court's historic verdict of 2009 wherein the court had read down Section 377 IPC to the effect that it decriminalised Section 377.
The order was overruled by a two-member bench of the Supreme Court in 2013.
Earlier in the day, Justice Nariman observed that the court cannot leave a matter to the legislature if it violates the fundamental rights gifted by the Constitution to every citizen of the country.
The five-member bench also observed that the top court will not wait for a government to enact, amend or not enact a law on any issue that violates individuals' fundamental rights.
courtesy : indiatoday.in
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Tehran/Islamabad: Iran has outlined a 10-point plan as the basis for upcoming talks with the United States, expected to begin in Islamabad on April 11, according to a statement from the Iranian Supreme National Security Council.
The plan lays out Tehran’s key political, military and economic demands, and is being seen as a framework for negotiations following the recent escalation in the region.
Strait of Hormuz at the centre
A major focus of the plan is the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global shipping route. Iran has proposed “controlled passage through the Strait of Hormuz in coordination with the Iranian armed forces,” which it says would give the country a unique economic and geopolitical position.
The plan also calls for the “establishment of a safe transit protocol” in the Strait that would guarantee Iran’s dominance under an agreed mechanism.
Call to end conflict
Iran has demanded “the necessity of ending the war against all elements of the axis of resistance,” signalling its expectation that hostilities should stop not only in Iran but also involving allied groups in the region.
US troop withdrawal
Another key demand is the “withdrawal of US combat forces from all bases and deployment points in the region,” indicating Tehran’s long-standing position against American military presence in West Asia.
Sanctions relief and compensation
The plan places strong emphasis on economic measures. It calls for “full payment of Iran’s damages according to estimates,” along with “the lifting of all primary and secondary sanctions and resolutions of the Board of Governors and the Security Council.”
It also seeks “the release of all Iranian assets and properties frozen abroad,” which have been a major point of contention for years.
Binding global guarantee
Finally, Iran has demanded that all these terms be formally recognised through “a binding Security Council resolution,” suggesting it wants international legal backing to ensure enforcement.
What this means
The 10-point plan reflects Iran’s broader push for security guarantees, economic relief and regional influence. The upcoming talks in Islamabad are expected to test how far both sides are willing to negotiate on these demands.
