"Tu Hai Kya Cheez..": Convict, lawyer threaten woman judge in court after cheque bounce conviction
New Delhi: A Delhi court witnessed a serious breach of courtroom decorum when a convict and his lawyer threatened and abused Judicial Magistrate Shivangi Mangla following a conviction in a cheque bounce case.
The accused, who was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, reacted aggressively after the judgment, directing threats toward the judge. According to the court's order dated April 2, the accused said: “Tu hai kya cheez… bahar mil dekhte hai kaise zinda ghar jaati hai...”
(“Who even are you… just meet me outside and let’s see how you make it back home alive.”)
The judge recorded that the accused attempted to hurl an object at her and instructed his lawyer to secure a favourable outcome by any means. Further, she noted that both the convict and his counsel mentally and physically harassed her, demanding her resignation and threatening to file complaints to force her out of office.
Judge Mangla stated she would initiate appropriate action before the National Commission for Women in response to the threats and harassment.
“The undersigned shall be taking appropriate measures against the accused... for such threatening and harassment,” the order read.
Additionally, the court issued a show cause notice to Advocate Atul Kumar, counsel for the accused, asking him to explain his conduct and why criminal contempt proceedings should not be initiated.
“Court notice be issued to counsel for accused Sh. Atul Kumar... to explain as to why he shall not be referred to the Hon’ble High Court for initiating criminal contempt proceedings,” the judge directed.
The lawyer is required to submit his written response on the next date of hearing.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Eggs safe for consumption, cancer risk claims unfounded: FSSAI
New Delhi (PTI): The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has categorically dismissed recent claims linking eggs to cancer risk, terming them "misleading, scientifically unsupported and capable of creating unnecessary public alarm".
In a statement issued on Saturday, the food safety regulator clarified that eggs available in the country are safe for human consumption and that reports alleging the presence of carcinogenic substances in eggs lack a scientific basis.
The clarification comes in response to media reports and social media posts claiming detection of nitrofuran metabolites (AOZ) -- substances purportedly linked to cancer -- in eggs sold in India.
FSSAI officials emphasised that the use of nitrofurans is strictly prohibited at all stages of poultry and egg production under the Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, Toxins and Residues) Regulations, 2011.
The regulator explained that an Extraneous Maximum Residue Limit (EMRL) of 1.0 µg/kg has been prescribed for nitrofuran metabolites -- but solely for regulatory enforcement purposes. This limit represents the minimum level that can be reliably detected by advanced laboratory methods and does not indicate that the substance is permitted for use.
"Detection of trace residues below the EMRL does not constitute a food safety violation nor does it imply any health risk," an FSSAI official said.
FSSAI said India's regulatory framework is aligned with international practices. The European Union and the United States also prohibit the use of nitrofurans in food-producing animals and employ reference points for action or guideline values only as enforcement tools.
Differences in numerical benchmarks across countries reflect variations in analytical and regulatory approaches, not differences in consumer safety standards, the authority noted.
On public health concerns, FSSAI cited scientific evidence indicating that there is no established causal link between trace-level dietary exposure to nitrofuran metabolites and cancer or other adverse health outcomes in humans.
"No national or international health authority has associated normal egg consumption with increased cancer risk," the regulator reiterated.
Addressing reports related to the testing of a specific egg brand, officials explained that such detections are isolated and batch-specific, often arising from inadvertent contamination or feed-related factors, and are not representative of the overall egg supply chain in the country.
"Generalising isolated laboratory findings to label eggs as unsafe is scientifically incorrect," the statement said.
FSSAI urged consumers to rely on verified scientific evidence and official advisories, reiterating that eggs remain a safe, nutritious, and valuable component of a balanced diet when produced and consumed in compliance with food safety regulations.
