Urdu council NCPUL faces backlash for promoting Savarkar through Urdu translation
New Delhi: The Narendra Modi government has come under criticism for allegedly using state-backed cultural institutions to promote Hindutva ideologues, following the publication of an Urdu translation of a book glorifying Vinayak Damodar Savarkar by the National Council for the Promotion of Urdu Language (NCPUL), an autonomous body under the Ministry of Education.
The translated book, titled “Veer Savarkar aur Takseem Hind ka Alamiya,” is the Urdu version of “Veer Savarkar: The Man Who Could Have Prevented Partition” by Uday Mahurkar and Chirayu Pandit, originally published in 2021. The Urdu edition was launched at an event held at the Prime Minister’s Museum on Thursday.
At the launch, Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal described Savarkar as a “visionary deeply sensitive to national unity and integrity,” and claimed that “had Savarkar’s ideas been implemented, the country could have been saved from disintegration,” The Observer Post reported.
The translation was done by Prof. Mazhar Asif, Vice-Chancellor of Jamia Millia Islamia. The authors stated that their work sought to present “truthful and unbiased information” and to counter “misconceptions spread by a particular political ideology,” as quoted by The Observer Post.
However, historians and academics have sharply criticised the move. Prof. Nadeem Rezavi, secretary of the Indian History Congress and a history faculty member at Aligarh Muslim University, called the development “shocking,” accusing the government of attempting to rewrite history, The Observer Post reported.
“Savarkar was among the earliest proponents of the two-nation theory, even before the Muslim League adopted it in 1940,” Rezavi said. “In his 1937 address to the Hindu Mahasabha, Savarkar declared that India was home to two nations — Hindus and Muslims — a statement that deepened communal divisions and contributed to the atmosphere leading to Partition,” according to The Observer Post.
Rezavi also pointed out that under Savarkar’s leadership, the Hindu Mahasabha formed coalition governments with the Muslim League in Sindh and Bengal during the Quit India Movement. “He even supported Travancore’s bid for independence in 1947 as a counter to a secular Indian state,” he added, as reported by The Observer Post.
A former NCPUL official also criticised the council’s decision, saying it marked a “departure from its original mandate.” “The NCPUL was established to promote Urdu language and literature, not to propagate the legacy of divisive political figures,” the official said, The Observer Post noted.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Siddaramaiah stresses need to establish Supreme Court bench in South India
Bengaluru (PTI): Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Saturday stressed the need to improve accessibility to the highest court of the land, asserting that establishing a Supreme Court bench in South India would go a long way in ensuring justice.
Speaking at the 22nd Biennial State Level Conference of Judicial Officers with a theme 'Reimagining the Judiciary in the era of Artificial Intelligence', he said, the authority of a judge must never be overshadowed by the authority of an algorithm.
"Even as we explore these new frontiers, we must remain mindful of the enduring challenges facing our judiciary," the chief minister said.
"Pendency of cases continues to be a serious concern that affects the timely delivery of justice. While technology can provide tools to address this, it must be complemented by systemic reforms through strengthening infrastructure, increasing judicial capacity, and modernising court processes," Siddaramaiah said.
"There is also a strong and compelling need to improve accessibility to the highest court of the land. The establishment of a Supreme Court bench in South India would go a long way in ensuring justice," he said.
Chief Justice of India, Surya Kant, Supreme Court Judges B V Nagarathna and Aravind Kumar and Chief Justice of High Court of Karnataka Vibhu Bakhru were among those present.
The CM said, "We stand today at a defining juncture where law and technology are no longer separate domains, but interconnected forces shaping governance, rights, and the very nature of justice itself."
"Artificial Intelligence is emerging as a transformative force that challenges how we interpret evidence, how we understand facts, and how decisions are arrived at. It offers immense promise, aiding faster legal research, improved case management, and the possibility of reducing pendency through intelligent systems," he said.
"Yet, it also raises profound concerns. Algorithmic bias can undermine the guarantee of equality before law. Opaque systems may weaken the doctrine of reasoned decisions, which lies at the heart of our judicial process," he added.
Siddaramaiah said, Judicial independence, which is the cornerstone of our democracy, must be preserved not only from external pressures but also from subtle technological dependence.
"The authority of a judge must never be overshadowed by the authority of an algorithm," he said.
Pointing out that the emergence of AI-generated evidence presents new challenges for our legal system, the CM said, Deepfakes, synthetic data, and machine-generated content compel us to revisit established doctrines relating to admissibility, burden of proof, and authenticity.
"The courts will increasingly be called upon to determine what constitutes reliable evidence in a digital age. In doing so, we must ensure that truth remains grounded in verifiability and integrity, not merely in technological sophistication," he said.
Hoping that the judiciary will play a defining role in shaping the regulatory framework for artificial intelligence in India, he further said, "through well-established constitutional doctrines such as due process, proportionality, and the right to privacy, our courts will determine the contours within which AI must operate."
"The judiciary, therefore, is not only a user of technology but also the ethical compass that will guide its deployment in society," he added.
Noting that technology also offers meaningful opportunities to strengthen judicial processes, Siddaramaiah said, AI-assisted legal research may democratise access to precedents and reduce disparities in legal knowledge.
Siddaramaiah also said that blockchain technology holds promise in ensuring secure, tamper-proof judicial records. Stating that the intelligent case management systems can streamline court functioning and reduce delays, he said, "However, these innovations must be adopted with care, ensuring that efficiency does not come at the cost of fairness."
"In this transformation, the capacity of our judicial institutions becomes critical. Judges of the future must be equipped not only with legal acumen but also with a clear understanding of technological systems," he added.
Stating that the question is how artificial intelligence intersects with the fundamental principles of equality and social justice, the CM said, if not carefully designed and regulated, AI systems can replicate and even amplify existing social inequalities.
No algorithm can replace the human capacity for empathy, the wisdom that comes from lived experience, or the moral reasoning that defines judicial decision-making, he said, "Technology can assist, but it cannot replace the human conscience that lies at the heart of justice."
Siddaramaiah said, the Government of Karnataka remains committed to building robust judicial infrastructure, facilitating digital transformation, and creating an ecosystem where innovation and justice can progress together.
