Vowed to make Shiv Sainik CM of Maharashtra: Uddhav Thackeray
Mumbai, Sep 28: Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray on Saturday recalled the "promise" he had made to his late father Bal Thackeray to install a 'Shiv Sainik' (party worker) as chief minister of Maharashtra.
Uddhav's statement comes against the backdrop of BJP top brass repeatedly stressing that incumbent Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis would helm the state once again.
The Sena is projecting Uddhav's son Aaditya as the chief ministerial face in the event of the NDA returning to power once again after the next month's assembly polls.
Addressing party workers and ticket aspirants in suburban Bandra, Uddhav also said talks with Shah were progressing well and a final decision on sharing of seats between the BJP and the Sena would be announced soon.
According to sources, the announcement is getting delayed amidst intense haggling over the number of seats and due to "shraddha paksha" period, which many believe an 'inauspicious' period to do new things. The "paksha" or the fortnight period ended on September 28.
"I had promised Balasaheb (founder of Shiv Sena) that I will make a Shiv sainik chief minister of Maharashtra. I have vowed to fulfil this promise," he said.
Speaking about the alliance with the BJP, Uddhav said, "if the deal with BJP materialises, the Sena will not backstab. Sena never backstabs. We oppose openly".
"I want power in Maharashtra so I have called aspirants from all the 288 seats. I want to strengthen the Sena in all the constituencies. If alliance with BJP happens, Shiv Sena will work to ensure BJP's victory in the seats they contest. BJP's support should always be there for Sena candidates where they contest," he said.
"I want to ensure that our election preparedness is complete in the constituencies where Sena will contest," he said while urging the cadres to stay loyal to the party and allies.
"If Shiv sainiks trust me and stay with me, I can confidently move ahead on the political path," he said.
Mocking senior NCP leader Ajit Pawar, who resigned as an MLA on Friday evening, Thackeray said, "I will not quit politics and do farming. I will work as a Shiv sainik."
In 2014 elections, the BJP and the Sena contested separately over a dispute over sharing of seats.
The BJP won maximum 122 out of 260 seats it had contested while the Sena bagged 63 out of 282 seats.
Both the parties later joined hands to form a BJP-led government.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Congress using hijab issue to pacify minority anger, alleges Karnataka LoP R Ashoka
Bengaluru: Leader of Opposition in the Assembly R. Ashoka has accused the Congress government of using the hijab issue to placate what he described as discontent among minority voters after the Davanagere by-election.
In a post on X on Wednesday, Ashoka alleged that the state government, instead of addressing issues such as price rise, corruption, farmers’ distress and law and order, was attempting to retain its minority vote base by reviving the hijab issue.
Referring to the 2022 dress code introduced by the BJP government, which prohibited hijab in schools and colleges, Ashoka said the Karnataka High Court had upheld the policy and emphasised the importance of discipline in educational institutions.
He questioned the Congress government’s move to revisit the issue and asked whether setting aside the court-backed policy to benefit one community could be described as secularism.
Ashoka further alleged that while the government was willing to permit hijab, it continued to prohibit saffron shawls.
He accused the government of dividing students on religious lines rather than treating schools and colleges as spaces of equality.
Drawing a comparison with Mamata Banerjee’s government in West Bengal, Ashoka claimed that excessive appeasement politics had harmed the state and warned that the Congress in Karnataka could face a similar political response.
He said voters in Karnataka would teach the Congress a lesson for what he termed “vote-bank politics” and for compromising constitutional and judicial principles.
