Amroha (Uttar Pradesh), July 22: In a peculiar case, a woman, with a five-month-old foetus in her bag, went to the police station to file a rape complaint here on Saturday.

The police, who registered a complaint of rape and abortion, took woman to a hospital for medical investigation. In her complaint, the woman alleged that she was raped six months ago and when she got pregnant, she was given contraceptive pills. The police said that the woman and the accused were in relationship. But after she got pregnant, the accused allegedly forced her to abort the pregnancy to avoid the marriage.  

Hasanpur SHO DK Sharma said that they were in a relationship and later, the boy made her to abort to avoid the marriage.



Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Chennai: The Madras High Court has set aside a Tamil Nadu government order restricting maternity leave for a third pregnancy to 12 weeks, holding the move to be contrary to established legal principles.

A division bench comprising Justices R Suresh Kumar and N Senthil Kumar ruled that there was no justification to treat third pregnancies differently from the first two, observing that the physical and medical requirements of childbirth remain the same irrespective of the number of pregnancies, as reported by The News Minute.

According to a report published by Live Law, the court was hearing a petition filed by Shayee Nisha, a staff member of the district judiciary in Villupuram, whose request for maternity leave from February 2026 to February 2027 had been curtailed to three months by authorities citing the March 13, 2026 government order.

Quashing the decision of the Principal District Judge and related directions asking her to resume duty, the bench directed that she be granted maternity leave on par with that provided for earlier pregnancies, allowing up to 365 days.

The court noted that both the Supreme Court of India and earlier rulings of the High Court had consistently held that maternity benefits cannot be denied for a third child. Holding the restriction to be unsustainable, the court directed authorities to process maternity leave applications without discrimination based on the number of pregnancies.

It also pointed out that a similar issue had been addressed by a division bench earlier this year, which had disapproved denial of maternity leave in such cases and directed that its ruling be circulated among judicial officers. Despite this, the state issued the impugned order, the bench observed.