Mangaluru: Advocate Manjunath N., representing Sujatha Bhat, mother of missing medical student Ananya Bhat, has welcomed the move of Dharmasthala villagers to approach the Special Investigation Team probing the mass burials case.

He described it as a hopeful sign in the pursuit of truth and justice. In a statement released today, the advocate revealed that locals had come forward with credible claims about witnessing secret burials in the village.

Advocate Manjunath raised procedural concerns, reiterating his long-standing appeal to have the SIT office formally declared as a police station under the Criminal Procedure Code. “Since the formation of the SIT, we have urged that its office be designated as a police station to avoid unnecessary inconvenience and ensure smooth functioning of the helpline created for the probe,” he said. The lack of such a status, he warned, is hampering the team’s ability to register and act on complaints directly.

Despite the fresh complainants’ willingness to participate, a response issued by the SIT reportedly directed them to approach the jurisdictional police station instead. This, according to Manjunath, defeats the very purpose of having a dedicated SIT if it cannot independently register cases or accept crucial information from witnesses.

The Advocate also has released a letter from a third anonymous witness in the Dharmasthala mass burials case.

In the letter the witness claims to represent villagers from Dharmasthala and nearby areas, has written to SIT Chief Pranab Mohanty seeking inclusion in the ongoing exhumation operations. According to the letter, the individual claims to have personally witnessed the first complainant, whose identity has been featured in media reports, secretly transporting and burying human remains at various sites in the village.

The witness emphasized that while the burial operations may have been carried out in secrecy, they did not go unnoticed in a closely-knit rural community. He appealed to the SIT to allow them to independently identify burial sites beyond those already marked by the first complainant.

The third witness also expressed confidence in the SIT, noting that its formation under the direction of the Chief Minister has emboldened fearful villagers to come forward. They described the SIT’s presence as a “shield of safety” that is helping the truth surface after years of silence.

However, the SIT's assistant officer, in an official response, noted that the witness’s application had been reviewed and advised that complaints or evidence regarding criminal activity must be submitted to the jurisdictional police station for further action.

Get all the latest, breaking news from Mangaluru and Dakshina Kannada in a single click. CLICK HERE to get all the latest news from Mangaluru.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi: A significant political controversy has erupted following the Modi government's decision to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), a move that has drawn sharp criticism from opposition parties. The row was further fueled by BJP MP Kangana Ranaut, who, while defending the name change, erroneously claimed that Mahatma Gandhi had made the devotional song "Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram" India’s national anthem.

The central government has rebranded the flagship rural employment scheme from MGNREGA to the "Viksit Bharat-Guarantee for Employment and Livelihood Mission," abbreviated as VB-G RAM G. The removal of Mahatma Gandhi's name from the scheme has been termed an insult to the Father of the Nation by the Congress and other opposition parties.

When questioned by the media outside Parliament regarding the opposition's allegations, Mandi MP Kangana Ranaut defended the government's decision by invoking Mahatma Gandhi's devotion to Lord Ram.

"How is naming it 'Ram Ji' an insult to Gandhi ji?" Ranaut asked. "Mahatma Gandhi made 'Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram' the national anthem to organize the entire country. Therefore, this is an insult to Mahatma Gandhi? The government is fulfilling his dream by giving it the name of Ram."


Ranaut's claim regarding the national anthem was immediately seized upon by the opposition. Congress leader Supriya Shrinate shared the video of Ranaut’s statement on social media, tweeting sarcastically, "Come on brother, today we learned a new national anthem! The BJP is full of such gems."

Social media users also trolled the MP for the factual error. One user quipped, "Kangana ji forgot to mention that Bapu made this the national anthem after the country got independence in 2014," while another commented that the party finds people who "don't use their brains while forwarding WhatsApp messages."

Beyond the social media mockery, senior Congress leaders criticised the renaming on ideological grounds. Former Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot took to X (formerly Twitter) to condemn the move.

"The biggest irony is that Mahatma Gandhi was a lifelong devotee of Lord Ram and said 'Hey Ram' in his last moments," Gehlot wrote. "Today, the central government is making a despicable attempt to sideline Gandhi ji under the guise of the same 'Ram' name (VB-G RAM G), which is highly condemnable."