Dharmasthala burial case: Accused Chinnayya appears in Belthangady court
Belthangady: Witness and primary accused in the Dharmasthala multiple burial case, Chinnayya, appeared in Belthangady Court on Thursday for a hearing of the said case.
Chinnayya, who is reportedly making his second appearance in court since being granted bail, is learned to have arrived in an auto rickshaw with his wife Mallika and appeared before Belthangady Principal Commercial Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class Rajendra Prasad in connection with the Dharmasthala case.
The court is hearing the case filed under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 215 (False evidence), following the submission of a report by the SIT officials probing the case of multiple burials in Dharmasthala against Mahesh Shetty Timarodi, Jayant T, Chinnayya, Sowjanya’s uncle Vithal Gowda, Girish Mattannavar and Sujatha Bhat.
Senior advocate CV Nagesh, who represents Kshetra Dharmasthala in the case, also appeared in court. He was accompanied by 10 lawyers, including Rajashekhar Hilyar, Mahesh Kaje, Sunil and Pradeep.
Members of Kshetra Dharmasthala are learned to have urged the concerned authorities to consider them as an aggrieved party in the case.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
No need for guv: DMK leader Kanimozhi
Chennai (PTI): Senior DMK leader Kanimozhi Karunanidhi on Friday reiterated her party’s opposition to the office of the governor amid uncertainty over government formation in Tamil Nadu after a fractured election mandate.
Speaking to PTI Videos, Kanimozhi emphasised that the DMK’s demand for the abolition of the governor’s post remained unchanged, especially as questions arise over constitutional propriety during the current political transition.
"Our position that we do not need a governor at all is something the DMK has never changed at any point in time," she said.
When asked about the governor’s actions following the election results—particularly the delay in inviting the leading party to form the government—Kanimozhi pointed to what she described as the "inherent friction" between the office of the governor and the political interests of the state.
She said the current situation "raises a lot of questions" and requires introspection regarding constitutional procedures.
Kanimozhi described the election results as lacking a "clear mandate", which she identified as the primary reason for the prevailing political uncertainty in the state.
"What the people decide is supreme," she said, adding that while the mandate was not decisive, it must be respected.
The Thoothukudi MP attributed the ongoing delays and "many confusions" to the absence of a decisive majority for any single party.
She firmly dismissed rumours about the DMK potentially supporting the AIADMK from outside to help stabilise the government.
She described such reports as mere "speculation" and "rumours".
"We can’t be responding to every rumour," she said, declining to comment on the AIADMK’s claims regarding its numbers to form the government.
The political situation in Tamil Nadu remains fluid as stakeholders await the governor’s next constitutional step in an Assembly where no party has secured a clear majority.
The DMK and AIADMK—both of which suffered significant losses to the TVK—are reportedly exploring tactical manoeuvres to navigate the hung Assembly.
The TVK, with 108 seats and the support of Congress’s five MLAs, is still short of the majority mark. The DMK and AIADMK secured 59 and 47 seats, respectively.
