Mangaluru: New office of Charvi Communication inaugurated
Mangaluru: New office of Charvi communication Pvt. Ltd. was inaugurated on Wednesday at Manasa tower on MG road here.
Chartered Accountant and Chairman of Brilliant Educational Institutions Ram Mohan Rai, inaugurated the new office of the company which also marked the first year celebrations of the establishment of the company.
Speaking on the occasion, Ram Mohan Rai, wished every success to Charvi Communication and said that “Nagesh Shashank, has extensive experience in the field of advertising and event management. He has the ability to lead this venture to success”.
Krishnaraj Sallian, Sales and Marketting Head of Nirman Homes, congratulated the stakeholders on the inauguration of the new office and hoped their business to reach new heights.
“Charvi Communication is advertising and Event Management Company, that also offers creative consultancy, media planning and digital marketing for all kinds of businesses” said Nagesh Shashank, Managing Director of Charvi Communication.
“Our corporate clients include major real-estate companies of Mangaluru, Mangalore Refineries and Petro-Chemicals Limited (MRPCL) and almost all the auto-mobile companies like Honda, Toyota, Skoda and Mercedes.” he added.
Naveen Shetty, Marketing Head of Vijayawani, Mohammed Muslim Koppa, Marketing Head of Vartha Bharati, Roopitha Shenoy, director of the organization, Nagesh Shashank's mother Vinaya Shenoy and others were present during the event.
Mahesh Nayak compered the program.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Court can reject anticipatory bail but cannot direct accused to surrender: SC
New Delhi (PTI): A court can reject anticipatory bail of an accused but it has no jurisdiction to direct him to surrender before the trial court, the Supreme Court has said.
A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and Ujjal Bhuyan made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a man accused of cheating and forgery.
"If the court wants to reject the anticipatory bail, it may do so, but the court has no jurisdiction to say that the petitioner should now surrender," the bench said.
The Jharkhand High Court had rejected anticipatory bail plea of the accused and asked him to surrender and seek regular bail.
In this case, a complaint had been filed before a magistrate alleging offences under Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 420 (cheating), 467 (forgery of valuable security), 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating), 471 (using forged document) and 120B read with 34 of the IPC, in connection with a land dispute.
The high court had dismissed the second anticipatory bail application of the accused on the ground that no new circumstances were shown.
It had relied on its earlier order rejecting his first anticipatory bail plea, in which the court directed the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail in terms of the decision in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI.
The top court said such a direction was wholly without jurisdiction and said that if a court chooses to reject anticipatory bail, it may do so, but it cannot compel the accused to surrender.
