Shirva: Army Soldier Muhammad Salim dies of Kidney illness at 35
Shirva: Indian Army Soldier, Muhammad Salim (35), a resident of Belle Kuntalanagar, passed away on June 7 at the Military Hospital in Bengaluru due to a kidney illness.
Salim served the Indian Army for 14-years in the 196 regiment across Jammu-Kashmir, Delhi, and Secunderabad, and was currently stationed in Haryana.
ALSO READ: Bike hits telephone junction box by road in Kasaragod; 2 youngsters killed on spot
He was admitted to the military hospital in Bengaluru after suffering from kidney failure. Despite his mother and wife, Donating kidneys, the treatment was unsuccessful. Salim breathed his last on Friday morning.
He is survived by his father, mother, wife, son, and daughter.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Court can reject anticipatory bail but cannot direct accused to surrender: SC
New Delhi (PTI): A court can reject anticipatory bail of an accused but it has no jurisdiction to direct him to surrender before the trial court, the Supreme Court has said.
A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and Ujjal Bhuyan made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a man accused of cheating and forgery.
"If the court wants to reject the anticipatory bail, it may do so, but the court has no jurisdiction to say that the petitioner should now surrender," the bench said.
The Jharkhand High Court had rejected anticipatory bail plea of the accused and asked him to surrender and seek regular bail.
In this case, a complaint had been filed before a magistrate alleging offences under Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 420 (cheating), 467 (forgery of valuable security), 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating), 471 (using forged document) and 120B read with 34 of the IPC, in connection with a land dispute.
The high court had dismissed the second anticipatory bail application of the accused on the ground that no new circumstances were shown.
It had relied on its earlier order rejecting his first anticipatory bail plea, in which the court directed the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail in terms of the decision in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI.
The top court said such a direction was wholly without jurisdiction and said that if a court chooses to reject anticipatory bail, it may do so, but it cannot compel the accused to surrender.
