Social media platforms in India have seen stark political shift post 2014: Mohammed Zubair in M'lore
Mangaluru: Mohammed Zubair, the prominent fact-checker and co-founder of Alt News, highlighted the changing dynamics of media and social media narratives during a special event held at the Bishop Jathanna Auditorium here on Thursday. Zubair was the chief guest at the release of the special edition magazine of Eedina.com, where he shared his insights into the evolving political landscape and media discourse in India.
Zubair pointed out a stark shift in the behavior of social media platforms since 2014, when the BJP came to power. He observed that many pages and handles, which were once critical of the government, started praising it after the political change. He remarked that this transformation in tone and approach was a significant indicator of the influence of political power on digital platforms.
Sharing his personal journey, Zubair recounted how his frustration with the system and the visible shifts in political narratives on social media led him to transition from being a full-time software engineer to becoming a fact-checker.
He was critical of the mainstream media, accusing it of selectively reporting news to favor the ruling party. According to Zubair, media houses often pick positive stories from BJP-ruled states to portray the government in a good light, while any criticism is directed at states governed by opposition parties. He also highlighted how certain news stories are framed to target minorities or marginalized communities such as Dalits and SC/STs, creating divisive narratives.
Zubair went on to accuse many mainstream media outlets and anchors of being agenda-driven. He claimed that their coverage often serves to divert public attention from pressing issues and works to safeguard the interests of the BJP government.
He cited the recent incident at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital in West Bengal as an example. Zubair explained how misinformation and communal narratives were widely circulated across media platforms to politicize the tragedy, targeting the Trinamool Congress (TMC) and Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.
During his speech, Zubair stressed the urgent need for more independent media houses to counter biased reporting and provide a platform for balanced and accurate news.
The event concluded with an interactive session, where Zubair engaged with the audience, answering questions on the state of both mainstream and independent media.
Dr. HM Watson, Principal of Karnataka Theological College launched the mobile app of Eedina.com during the event.
Dr. Vasu HV presided over the program and delivered the presidential address. The event was attended by several prominent individuals, including M. Devdas of the Karnataka Dalit Sangarsh Samiti, social activist Vidya Dinkar, Shahnaz M of Anupama magazine, Jacinta Pereira of the Deeds organization, Laxman Kundar, and Dr. HM Watson.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
SC dismisses pleas seeking review of 2023 verdict declining legal sanction to same-sex marriage
New Delhi, Jan 9: The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed a batch of pleas seeking to review its October 2023 verdict declining legal sanction to same-sex marriage.
A five-judge bench of Justices B R Gavai, Surya Kant, B V Nagarathna, P S Narasimha and Dipankar Datta took up about 13 petitions related to the matter in chambers and dismissed them.
"We do not find any error apparent on the face of the record. We further find that the view expressed in both the judgements is in accordance with law and as such, no interference is warranted. Accordingly, the review petitions are dismissed," the bench said.
It said the judges have carefully gone through the judgements delivered by Justice (since retired) S Ravindra Bhat speaking for himself and for Justice (since retired) Hima Kohli as well as the concurring opinion expressed by Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, constituting the majority view.
The bench also rejected a prayer made in the review petitions for hearing in an open court.
According to practice, the review pleas are considered in chambers by the judges.
The new bench was constituted after Justice Sanjiv Khanna, the present CJI, recused from hearing the review petitions on July 10, 2024.
Notably, Justice P S Narasimha is the only member of the original Constitution bench comprising five judges which delivered the verdict, as former CJI D Y Chandrachud and Justices S K Kaul, Ravindra Bhat and Hima Kohli have retired.
A five-judge Constitution bench led by then CJI Chandrachud on October 17, 2024, refused to accord legal backing to same-sex marriages and held there was "no unqualified right" to marriage with the exception of those recognised by law.
The apex court, however, made a strong pitch for the rights of LGBTQIA++ persons so that they didn't face discrimination in accessing goods and services available to others, safe houses known as "garima greh" in all districts for shelter to members of the community facing harassment and violence, and dedicated hotlines in case of trouble.
In its judgement, the bench held transpersons in heterosexual relationships had the freedom and entitlement to marry under the existing statutory provisions.
It said an entitlement to legal recognition of the right to union, akin to marriage or civil union, or conferring legal status to the relationship could be only done through an "enacted law".
The five-judge Constitution bench delivered four separate verdicts on a batch of 21 petitions seeking legal sanction for same-sex marriages.
All five judges were unanimous in refusing the legal recognition to same-sex marriage under the Special Marriage Act and observed it was within Parliament's ambit to change the law for validating such a union.
While former CJI Chandrachud wrote a separate 247-page verdict, Justice Kaul penned a 17-page judgement where he broadly agreed with the former's views.
Justice Bhat, who authored an 89-page judgement for himself and Justice Kohli, disagreed with certain conclusions arrived at by the former CJI, including on applicability of adoption rules for such couples.
Justice Narasimha in his 13-page verdict was in complete agreement with the reasoning and conclusion of Justice Bhat.
The judges were unanimous in holding that queerness was a natural phenomenon and not an "urban or elite" notion.
In his judgement, the former CJI recorded Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's assurance of forming a committee chaired by the cabinet secretary to define and elucidate the scope of entitlements of such couples in a union.
The LGBTQIA++ rights activists, who won a major legal battle in 2018 in the Supreme Court, which decriminalised consensual gay sex, moved the apex court seeking validation of same-sex marriages and consequential reliefs such as rights to adoption, enrolment as parents in schools, opening of bank accounts and availing succession and insurance benefits.
Some of the petitioners sought the apex court to use its plenary power besides the "prestige and moral authority" to push the society to acknowledge such a union and ensure LGBTQIA++ persons led a "dignified" life like heterosexuals.
