Bengaluru: FIR against 25 ABVP activists for alleged vandalism at Azim Premji University
Bengaluru: An FIR has been registered at the Sarjapur Police Station against 25 ABVP activists for allegedly entering the premises of Azim Premji University and creating a disturbance during a protest on Tuesday evening.
The protest was staged to oppose a debate organised by the All-India Students’ Association (AISA) SPARK student wing, which ABVP claimed portrayed Kashmiri soldiers in a derogatory manner.
ABVP members had gathered outside the university and announced plans to submit a memorandum to the Union Minister seeking cancellation of the university’s recognition.
According to police, tensions escalated when some activists allegedly entered the campus, smeared ink on the university nameplate, and engaged in unruly behaviour. Pro-university students also staged a counter-protest inside the campus.
Based on a complaint filed by the university’s Security Head, S. Wilson, the FIR includes allegations of forced entry, issuing threats to security, Jagadish, Chandan Mahalik, Chattar Bahadur, Naresh, Sripathi and Harish, and assaulting a first-year BA student, Muhammad Ali Ahmed.
Police said 25 ABVP activists were taken into custody and later produced before a court. They have since filed applications seeking regular bail before the Anekal court.
Further investigation is under way.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Sujit Nair raises concerns over speculation of DMK-AIADMK understanding to block TVK
Chennai: Journalist and political commentator Sujit Nair has expressed concern over speculation that the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam could explore a post-poll understanding to prevent Vijay-led Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam from forming the government in Tamil Nadu.
In a social media post, Sujit Nair said the election verdict in Tamil Nadu reflected a clear public demand for political change and argued that the mandate should be respected irrespective of political preferences.
Referring to reports and political discussions surrounding a possible understanding between the DMK and AIADMK, he said he hoped such developments remained only speculative conversations and did not turn into reality.
Nair stated that if such an alliance were to take shape, it would raise serious questions about ideological politics in the country. He said TVK had emerged through a democratic electoral process and that the legitimacy to govern in a parliamentary democracy comes from the people’s verdict.
According to him, attempts to prevent an electoral winner from forming the government through unexpected political arrangements may be constitutionally valid, but many people could view them as politically opportunistic.
He further said that such a move could particularly affect the political image of the DMK, which has historically projected itself around ideology, social justice and opposition politics. Nair said that in ideological terms, the DMK appeared closer to TVK than to the AIADMK, and joining hands with its long-time political rival only to remain in power could weaken its broader political narrative.
He added that the same questions would apply to the AIADMK as well, as the party had spent decades positioning itself against the DMK and such an arrangement could create discomfort among its cadre and supporters.
Drawing a comparison with Maharashtra politics in 2019, Nair said he had expressed similar views when the Shiv Sena formed an alliance with the Indian National Congress and the Nationalist Congress Party after the Assembly elections.
He said post-poll alliances between long-standing political rivals often create a public perception that ideology and electoral mandates become secondary when political power equations come into play.
Nair also said such developments increase public cynicism towards politics and reinforce the belief among voters that ideology is often sidelined after elections.
He maintained that the Tamil Nadu verdict was emphatic and said respecting both the spirit and substance of the mandate was important for the credibility of democratic politics.
