BJP leader Ashwath Narayan alleges Rs 15,568 cr 'misappropriation' in smart meter tender process
Bengaluru, Mar 25 (PTI): BJP leader C N Ashwath Narayan on Tuesday alleged that 'misappropriation' amounting to approximately Rs 15,568 crore has taken place in the smart meter tender process of Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) and other Electricity Supply Companies (ESCOMS).
According to officials, a smart meter is an electronic device that records data such as electricity consumption, voltage levels, load, and various other technical parameters. This information is periodically transmitted to the server.
Accusing the Siddaramaiah-led Congress government of "favoritism and irregularities" in the tender process, the MLA claimed that the scale of this misappropriation is even larger and emphasised that ESCOMs should adhere to the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) rules.
The former Deputy Chief Minister's statement came a day after the Energy Department dismissed allegations of irregularities in the installation of smart meters, with BESCOM MD Shivashankara asserting that the smart meter purchase price was determined scientifically and executed with full transparency.
Addressing a press conference, the BJP leader argued that the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) rules do not mandate the use of smart meters.
He stated that while smart meters can be made mandatory for temporary connections, they cannot be enforced for permanent and new customers.
Citing Central Electricity Authority (CEA) regulations, the former Minister explained that smart meters for new consumers can only be mandated after all existing meters have been replaced with smart meters.
"Smart meters are not mandatory, even under Central Electricity Authority rules. The bid capacity under the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements (KTPP) Act was not mentioned in the tender. It should have been Rs 6,800 crore," Narayan said.
The BJP MLA pointed out that under the KTPP Act, the required turnover should be Rs 1,920 crore, whereas the tender amendment contract value was specified as Rs 107 crore annually.
He further alleged that despite a rule stating that no blacklisted company should be awarded the contract, BCITS, which was blacklisted in Uttar Pradesh, was still considered.
"As per central government guidelines, an experience of installing just one lakh smart meters is sufficient. However, this tender required experience with 10 lakh ordinary meters, seemingly to limit competition and favour Rajashree Electricals," Narayan alleged.
He noted that the estimated cost of the project was Rs 571 crore but was later amended.
Criticising the "lack of transparency", Narayan said, "The tender was issued without specifying the total amount. The KTPP Act was not followed, nor were central government rules implemented. A contractor with no experience in manufacturing or installing smart or digital meters was considered."
Highlighting that smart meters have been installed at lower costs in Congress-ruled states like Himachal Pradesh, Telangana, and Kerala, he pointed out, "In Karnataka, each meter costs Rs 17,000, whereas in other states, the price is Rs 7,740 per meter."
Recalling that an IAS officer and a minister were arrested in Bihar in 2023 over a similar scam, Narayan alleged that the Karnataka government had violated the KTPP Act at every level.
"This is daylight robbery. The (state) government must be held accountable. They are making smart meters mandatory without any legal backing," he alleged.
According to the BESCOM MD, as per the regulations, the tender process followed the Standard Bidding Documents provided by the Ministry of Power and complied with the KTPP Act.
The tender was issued on September 26, 2024. With the approval of the BESCOM Board of Directors, the contract was awarded to Rajashree Electricals, who submitted the lowest bid, on December 23, 2024.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Look-out circular issued against Union Minister Bandi Sanjay's son in POCSO case
Hyderabad (PTI): The Cyberabad police have issued a look-out circular against Union Minister Bandi Sanjay Kumar's son Bandi Bageerath, who has been booked under the POCSO Act, to prevent him from fleeing the country.
A police official told PTI on Saturday that searches are being conducted to nab Bageerath.
Meanwhile, Telangana Rakshana Sena (TRS) president K Kavitha, in a letter addressed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, demanded the removal of Sanjay Kumar, MoS (Home), from the Union Cabinet "to ensure a free and fair investigation in the POCSO case involving his son".
In a setback to Bageerath, the Telangana High Court on Friday night did not grant him any interim protection from arrest.
Dealing with an interim anticipatory bail petition of Bageerath, the court said it was not inclined to grant any interim order at this stage.
The counsel for Bageerath had requested interim protection from arrest until the orders on the petition were issued.
The case was registered under relevant Sections of the BNS and POCSO Act on May 8 against Bageerath based on a complaint by the mother of a 17-year-old girl, who alleged that Bageerath was in a relationship with her daughter and sexually harassed her.
After recording the statement of the victim, more stringent sections of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act were invoked in the case.
Bageerath had also lodged a counter-complaint, alleging that the girl, who got acquainted with him, had invited him to family functions and group gatherings. An FIR was registered based on Bageerath’s complaint.
In the complaint, Bageerath stated that, believing the girl’s family to be trustworthy, he accompanied them on visits to certain holy places as part of a group of friends.
He further alleged that the girl and her parents later pressured him to marry her. When he rejected the proposal, the girl's parents allegedly demanded money and threatened to file false complaints against him if he failed to pay.
Bageerath claimed that, out of fear, he paid Rs 50,000 to the girl's father, but the family later demanded Rs 5 crore. He also alleged that they threatened that the girl's mother would commit suicide if he failed to meet their demands.
