Caste census decision may take a year: Karnataka Minister Satish Jarkiholi
Bengaluru, Apr 18 (PTI): Karnataka PWD Minister Satish Jarkiholi on Friday said a decision on the Social and Educational Survey report, popularly referred to as caste census, is unlikely in the near future and may take upto a year due to the complexities involved.
He also cautioned that any misstep in addressing the concerns raised by various castes over the report may cause problems for the ruling Congress party in the future.
His remarks came a day after a special cabinet meeting convened to deliberate on the caste census report ended without any concrete decision amid internal differences within the government.
The cabinet is scheduled to take up the matter again on May 2.
"It is not something that will happen tomorrow, it may take one year. Don't expect it tomorrow, it may take a year, because there are issues, they are complicated. If everyone has to be pacified and taken into confidence, many meetings have to be held, the government has to be in a compromise mode, because this cannot be done all of a sudden," Jarkiholi said in response to a question.
Addressing reporters here, he said the report was almost 10 years old and the cabinet had taken it for consideration more than a year after its submission in February 2024.
"Nothing to worry, if discussions go on for a year. There is no urgency... Taking everyone into confidence, with unanimity and with cooperation of everyone, we will try to implement it," he added.
According to sources, some Ministers expressed reservations about the survey report in the cabinet, citing concerns raised by several quarters calling it "unscientific and outdated", and about undercounting.
Following this Chief Minister Siddaramaiah asked all Ministers to offer their views in writing or verbally.
Various communities, especially Karnataka's two dominant ones -- Vokkaligas and Veershaiva-Lingayats -- have expressed strong reservations about the survey that has been done, calling it "unscientific", and have demanded that it be rejected, and a fresh survey be conducted.
Objections have also been raised by various sections of society, and there are also strong voices against it from within the ruling Congress.
Asked about differences among Ministers in cabinet, Jarkiholi cited an example of discussion on the population of Sadara community, which is shown at 65,000 and said some Minister pointing at the community's presence in districts of Haveri, Davangere, Chitradurga, also partly in Shivamogga, objected to the numbers; while some Ministers trying to clarify said many from the community have registered as Hindu-Sadara during the survey, and they have been considered under different category, which my has resulted in fall of the population number.
Such things are there and time is needed to match and discuss all this, also experts and the community's opinion needs to be obtained, he said.
Noting that the survey has recommended increasing reservation, Jarkiholi said to implement it there is already a stay from the Supreme Court in connection with Tamil Nadu's case.
"So enhancing reservation may not be possible as of now. For now the challenge before us is rectifying the data... opportunity should be given to rectify, if people want to opt for being considered under a different category or with their original major community, it should be allowed," he said.
The survey has recommended hiking the OBC quota from the current 32 per cent to 51 percent.
By giving OBCs a 51 per cent reservation, along with the existing 17 per cent for SCs and 7 per cent for STs, it will take the state's total reservation to 75 per cent.
Pointing out that a number of castes have expressed reservation about the population data in the survey report, Jarkiholi said these concerns must be addressed to avoid any political repurcussions.
Food and Civil Supplies Minister K H Muniyappa said the cabinet will continue the discussions on the caste census and will take a decision to ensures that no community is affected.
"There would be no problem for oppressed communities or Vokkaligas and Veershaiva-Lingayats. The government is being run by all communities, and a decision will be done based on consensus," he added.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
High courts upheld only 8 per cent of death sentences; SC confirms none in recent years: Report
New Delhi (PTI): Highlighting that a high acquittal rate of death row convicts by the Supreme Court and high courts demonstrates a pattern of "erroneous or unjustified convictions", a study of 10 years of death penalty data has revealed that the top court did not confirm any death sentences in recent years.
The study by Square Circle Clinic, a criminal laws advocacy group with the NALSAR University of Law in Hyderabad, found that an overwhelming majority of death sentences imposed by trial courts did not withstand scrutiny at higher judicial levels. Acquittals far outnumbered confirmations at both the high courts and Supreme Court levels.
According to the report, the trial courts across India awarded 1,310 death sentences in 822 cases between 2016 and 2025. High courts considered 842 of these sentences in confirmation proceedings but upheld only 70 or 8.31 per cent.
In contrast, 258 death sentences (30.64 per cent) resulted in acquittals. The study noted that the acquittal rate at the high court level was nearly four times the confirmation rate.
Data showed that of the 70 death sentences confirmed by high courts, the Supreme Court decided 38 and did not uphold a single one. The apex court has confirmed no death sentences between 2023 and 2025.
"Wrongful or erroneous or unjustified convictions, then, are not random or freak accidents in the Indian criminal justice system. The data indicates they are a persistent and serious systemic concern," the report said.
Over the last decade, high courts adjudicated 1,085 death sentences in 647 cases, confirming only 106 (9.77 per cent). During this period, 326 persons in 191 cases, were acquitted.
The report attributed low confirmation rates to the appellate judiciary’s concerns regarding failures in due process. "This coincides with increased Supreme Court scrutiny of safeguards at the sentencing stage," the report said.
Of the 153 death sentences decided by the apex court over the last decade, the accused were acquitted in 38 cases. In 2025 alone, high courts overturned death sentences into acquittals in 22 out of 85 cases (over 25 per cent). The same year, Supreme Court acquitted accused persons in more than half of the death penalty cases it decided (10 out of 19), the report said.
The study highlighted that 364 persons who were ultimately acquitted "should not even have been convicted and unjustifiably suffered the trauma of death row". It added that such failures extend beyond adjudication and reflect serious lapses in investigation and prosecution.
The question of remedies for wrongful convictions remains pending before the Supreme Court. In September 2025, three persons acquitted by the apex court filed writ petitions seeking compensation from the state and argued that their wrongful convictions violated their fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.
"In 2022, the Supreme Court crystallised a sentencing process in Manoj v. State of Madhya Pradesh , and mandated all courts to follow those guidelines before imposing or confirming a death sentence," the report read.
In 2025, the apex court held in Vasanta Sampat Dupare v. Union of India that death penalty sentencing hearings form part of the right to a fair trial and stressed that capital punishment can be imposed only after a constitutionally compliant sentencing process.
"However, even at the high courts whether the process mandated under Manoj is being complied with is in doubt,” the report said.
