Chamarajanagar Municipality : SDPI defeats Congress candidate who won 9 times
BJP rises to power, SDPI wins 6 seats
Chamarajnagar: The BJP has emerged as the biggest party in the Chamarajanagar municipal corporation elections. But here SDPI has secured remarkable achievement by winning six seats.
Surprise result
The SDPI candidate Mahesh's win in the 9th ward has got more significance. The nine-time winner S Nanjundaswamy of Congress has now lost the seat.
S Nanjundaswamy was also the chairman of the municipality. Mahesh, a candidate from SDPI, has led to a surprise result by defeating him.
The BJP won 15 seats in the 31 wards. Congress won 7, SDPI 6, Independent 2 and BSP 1.
Ward wise candidates names and parties
1st Ward - Nilamma - Congress
2nd ward - Gauri - BJP
3rd ward - Muhammad Ameek - SDPI
4th Ward - Khalilullah - SDPI
5th Ward - Thousiya Banu - SDPI
6th Ward - Samiullah Khan - SDPI
7th Ward - Asha - BJP
8th Ward - Raghavendra - BJP
9th Ward - Mahesh - SDPI
10th Ward - Manoj Patel - BJP
11th Ward - Manjunath - BJP
12th Ward - Syed Abrar - SDPI
13th Ward - Kalavathi - Congress
14th Ward - Chinnamma - Congress
15th Ward - Jagadish - Independent
16th Ward - Chandrakala - Congress
17th Ward - Basavanna - Independent
18th Ward - Shanthi - Congress
19th Ward - Shivraj - BJP
20th Ward - Chandrasekhar - BJP
21st Ward - Sudarshan Gowda - BJP
22rd Ward - Mamata - BJP
23rd Ward - Gayatri - BJP
24th Ward - Bhagyam- Congress
25th Ward - Lokeshwari - BJP
26th Ward - Kumuda - BJP
27th Ward - Prakash-BSP
28th Ward - Suresh - BJP
29th Ward - Sudha - BJP
30th Ward - Mahadevaya - BJP
31rd Ward - Rajappa - Congress
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
'Fraud on Constitution': SC rules against religious conversion for quota benefits
New Delhi (PTI): In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court has said religious conversions undertaken solely to avail reservation benefits without genuine belief amounted to a "fraud on the Constitution".
Justices Pankaj Mithal and R Mahadevan passed the verdict on November 26 in a case filed by one C Selvarani and upheld a Madras High Court decision of January 24 denying a scheduled caste certificate to a woman who converted to Christianity but later claimed to be a Hindu to secure employment benefits.
Justice Mahadevan, who wrote the 21-page verdict for the bench, further underscored that one converted to a different religion, when they were genuinely inspired by its principles, tenets and spiritual thoughts.
"However, if the purpose of conversion is largely to derive the benefits of reservation but not with any actual belief in the other religion, the same cannot be permitted, as the extension of benefits of reservation to people with such ulterior motives will only defeat the social ethos of the policy of reservation,” he noted.
The evidence presented before the bench was found to have clearly demonstrated that the appellant professed Christianity and actively practiced the faith by attending church regularly.
"Despite the same, she claims to be a Hindu and seeks for a SC community certificate for the purpose of employment," it noted.
"Such a dual claim made by her," said the bench "was untenable and she cannot continue to identify herself as a Hindu after baptism".
The top court, therefore, held the conferment of scheduled caste communal status to the woman, who was a Christian by faith, but claimed to be still embracing Hinduism only for the purpose of availing reservation in employment, "would go against the very object of reservation and would amount to fraud on the Constitution".
The top court underlined a religious conversion solely to access reservation benefits, without genuine belief in the adopted religion, undermined the fundamental social objectives of the quota policy and her actions were contrary to the spirit of reservation policies aimed at uplifting the marginalised communities.
Selvarani, born to a Hindu father and a Christian mother, was baptised as a Christian shortly after birth but later claimed to be a Hindu and sought an SC certificate to apply for an upper division clerk position in Puducherry in 2015.
While her father belonged to the Valluvan caste, categorised under scheduled castes, he had converted to Christianity, as confirmed by documentary evidence.
The verdict said the appellant continued to practice Christianity, as seen by the regular church attendance, making her claim of being a Hindu untenable.
The bench noted individuals converting to Christianity lose their caste identity and must provide compelling evidence of reconversion and acceptance by their original caste to claim SC benefits.
The judgement said there was no substantial evidence of the appellant's reconversion to Hinduism or acceptance by the Valluvan caste.
Her claims lacked public declarations, ceremonies, or credible documentation to substantiate her assertions, it pointed out.
"One converts to a different religion when genuinely inspired by its principles. Conversion purely for reservation benefits, devoid of belief, is impermissible," the bench held.
The apex court opined in any case, upon conversion to Christianity, one lost their caste and couldn't be identified by it.
"As the factum of reconversion is disputed, there must be more than a mere claim. The conversion had not happened by any ceremony or through 'Arya Samaj'. No public declaration was effected. There is nothing on record to show that she or her family has reconverted to Hinduism and on the contrary, there is a factual finding that the appellant still professes Christianity,” it noted.
The bench said there was evidence against the appellant, and therefore, her contention raised that the caste would be under eclipse upon conversion and resumption of the caste upon reconversion, was "unsustainable".
