Bengaluru, November 23: “As the coalition government is economically bankrupt, the administration has completely collapsed. Even after six months of coming to power, this government is not existed. It is dead”, said former chief minister Jagadish Shettar.

Speaking to reporters at the office of the Opposition Leader at Vidhana Soudha here on Friday, he said that the government has no money to give pension to the employees. The bills worth Rs 6,000 crore were pending. It has not waived off Rs 46,000 crore farm loan as the state exchequer was empty, he said.

MLA Fund of Rs 2 crore should be released annually. But till date, the government has released just Rs 50 lakh. The development works were suspended. The government has no concerns towards the people, he alleged.

Not in a position to receive criticism

The Chief Minister was not in a position to receive the criticism in a sportive spirit. Opposition parties and media were not there to praise the Chief Minister. The Cooperative Minister has said that the government would collect the data of farm loan waiver beneficiaries. How long the government would take to do that work, he asked.

The state government has created a situation that sugarcane farmers have come to the streets. It was not fair to speak lightly on farmers who broke the lock of the gate during the protest. The government should solve the farmers problems first, he demanded.

Development is victim for prestige

For the individual prestige of Hassan, the government has been misusing the public tax money. The compromise politics of the coalition partners has been killing the development of the state, former minister CT Ravi blasted Minister HD Revanna.

The best example for such development was the government has released Rs 58 crore for establishing an engineering college at Mosale Hosahalli in Hassan. Though there were five engineering colleges including a government engineering college, even there was a shortage of students. When the situation was like that, what was the need to sanction another college for the district, he asked.

Publish White Paper

The government should publish a White Paper for the assurances it has made and the development works implemented. The government has not given priority to the drought and flood affected people, he said.

“I have no intention of contesting the forthcoming Lok Sabha election. But if the party asks me to contest for strengthening the party, I am ready to contest against former prime minister HD Deve Gowda from Hassan Lok Sabha constituency”.

-          CT Ravi, BJP Leader

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi (PTI): Broken relationships, while emotionally distressing, do not automatically amount to abetment of suicide in the absence of intention leading to the criminal offence, the Supreme Court on Friday said.

The observations came from a bench of Justices Pankaj Mithal and Ujjal Bhuyan in a judgement, which overturned the conviction of one Kamaruddin Dastagir Sanadi by the Karnataka High Court for the offences of cheating and abetment of suicide under the IPC.

"This is a case of a broken relationship, not criminal conduct," the judgment said.

Sanadi was initially charged under Sections 417 (cheating), 306 (abetment of suicide), and 376 (rape) of the IPC.

While the trial court acquitted him of all the charges, the Karnataka High Court, on the state's appeal, convicted him of cheating and abetment of suicide, sentencing him to five years imprisonment and imposing Rs 25,000 in fine.

According to the FIR registered at the mother's instance, her 21-year-old daughter was in love with the accused for the past eight years and died by suicide in August, 2007, after he refused to keep his promise to marry.

Writing a 17-page judgement, Justice Mithal analysed the two dying declarations of the woman and noted that neither was there any allegation of a physical relationship between the couple nor there was any intentional act leading to the suicide.

The judgement therefore underlined broken relationships were emotionally distressing, but did not automatically amount to criminal offences.

"Even in cases where the victim dies by suicide, which may be as a result of cruelty meted out to her, the courts have always held that discord and differences in domestic life are quite common in society and that the commission of such an offence largely depends upon the mental state of the victim," said the apex court.

The court further said, "Surely, until and unless some guilty intention on the part of the accused is established, it is ordinarily not possible to convict him for an offence under Section 306 IPC.”

The judgement said there was no evidence to suggest that the man instigated or provoked the woman to die by suicide and underscored a mere refusal to marry, even after a long relationship, did not constitute abetment.