Bengaluru: On November 30, Delhi Police allegedly attempted to arrest human rights activist and National General Secretary of the Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR), Nadeem Khan, without a warrant.
Four officers, including the Station House Officer (SHO) of Shaheen Bagh Police Station in Delhi, arrived at Khan's residence in Sampigehalli, Bengaluru, at approximately 5 PM. The officers allegedly tried to detain Khan for an investigation into an FIR (No. 0280/2024) filed earlier that day at Shaheen Bagh Police Station in Delhi.
The FIR, filed in relation to an exhibition organised by Khan that highlighted recent incidents of hate crimes and hate speeches in India, as well as the Supreme Court’s guidelines on mob violence, includes alleged violations under Sections 196, 353(2), and 61. These offences carry punishments of less than three years, and under Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and Section 35 of the BNSS Act, arrest is prohibited for offences punishable with less than seven years of imprisonment without a warrant or an order from the magistrate. Despite this, the police reportedly continued to intimidate Khan and his family. Local police from Sampigehalli were reportedly not informed about the operation.
Adv. Mohammed Niyaz, State Secretary of APCR Karnataka, who spoke to Vartha Bharati, condemned the police action. He stated that the officers initially claimed they were there to detain Nadeem Khan but changed their version when questioned about the non followance of the procedure, saying they were not there to arrest him but merely to deliver a notice.
Earlier, on November 29, around 20-25 police officers had visited the APCR office in Delhi without notice or any legal justification. They reportedly inquired about Khan and other members of the organization. The police officers were said to have misbehaved with lawyers when asked about the basis for their visit.
Adv. Niyaz also confirmed that Khan had left for Delhi and would continue to challenge the attempt to arrest him and the FIR through legal means.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Mysuru (PTI): Union Minister H D Kumaraswamy on Sunday launched a sharp attack on the Congress government in Karnataka over petrol and diesel prices, accusing it of "misleading the public" while repeatedly raising taxes and fuel prices to finance its guarantee schemes.
Addressing a public outreach programme titled 'Janarondige Janata Dal' (Janata Dal with the people) and a membership campaign in the Chamundeshwari Assembly constituency in Mysuru, the JD(S) state president challenged Congress leaders to make public the number of tax hikes and price increases imposed by the state government over the last three years.
"On one hand, the government is deceiving people by claiming to provide guarantees, while on the other, it is repeatedly increasing prices. Let the Congress government release a list of how many times it has imposed taxes and raised prices," Kumaraswamy said.
He alleged that the Congress government had continuously increased taxes and prices on liquor, bus fares, electricity, and several other sectors to mobilise funds for its five guarantee schemes—Gruha Lakshmi, Gruha Jyothi, Anna Bhagya, Shakti, and Yuva Nidhi.
Kumaraswamy also criticised Congress leaders for attacking the Centre over fuel price hikes and asked them to introspect on their own contribution to the state’s development before holding the proposed 'Sadhana Samavesha' (achievement convention) on May 19.
Referring to the global oil situation, he said the ongoing conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran had triggered an international oil supply crisis and argued that fuel prices in India remained lower than in many developed countries.
"In Singapore, which is a developed country, petrol costs Rs 245. Congress leaders should open their eyes and see this," he claimed.
He further questioned what the Congress party would have done had it been in power during the present international crisis.
"Did anyone foresee that such a war would take place? If Congress leaders had such foresight, let them say so. If the Congress party itself had been in power during such a difficult situation, what would it have done?" Kumaraswamy asked.
Throughout his address, the former CM mounted a sustained attack on Congress leaders and dismissed claims that guarantee schemes had improved people’s lives.
"Congress leaders think people are living peacefully because of the guarantee schemes. That is wrong," he said.
Recalling the by-election scenario in the Chamundeshwari constituency in 2006, Kumaraswamy said JD(S) had suffered defeat due to internal mistakes within the party.
"If our leaders had been cautious then, the situation would not have reached this stage. JD(S) suffered defeat because of some mistakes on our part," he said.
He added that he shared a deep bond with the constituency.
Calling upon party workers to prepare for the next Assembly elections, Kumaraswamy expressed confidence that JD(S) would win 75 seats in the next polls and asserted that Chamundeshwari constituency would return to the party in 2028.
"There is no confusion in our party," he said, adding that JD(S) would not bow to any pressure and that the convention had been organised to strengthen its presence in Chamundeshwari.
"Our party has lakhs of loyal workers as its backbone. JD(S) remains strong even today because of the hard work of our cadre," he said.
Kumaraswamy also claimed that during his tenure as CM, he had sanctioned more funds for the Chamundeshwari constituency than the present CM (Siddaramaiah).
"We are not holding this convention to oppose anyone. We are organising it to inform the people about the failures of the state government," he said.
Addressing the gathering in a traditional turban, Kumaraswamy said the gesture was intended to send a message to the Hallumatha and Kuruba communities and reassure them of JD(S) support.
"JD(S) is working for Kurubas, Dalits, and minorities. I am not helping distressed people for publicity. I do it out of self-satisfaction and duty," he said.
