Ex-Minister Nagendra being pressurised by ED to spell out names in Valmiki scam: CM Siddaramaiah
Bengaluru, Jul 19: Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Friday said former minister B Nagendra, who is in ED’s custody in connection with the ST Corporation scam, is being pressurised to name some people.
Nagendra resigned as Tribal Welfare Minister after the Karnataka Maharshi Valmiki Scheduled Tribe Development Corporation, Accounts Superintendent Chandrasekharan P died by suicide on May 26.
The officer said in his suicide note that there was an embezzlement of Rs 187 crore, including the illegal transfer of Rs 88 crore money.
Based on a complaint by the Union Bank of India from where the money was illegally transferred to 217 bank accounts in Hyderabad, the CBI launched an investigation and the Enforcement Directorate also joined.
ALSO READ: Valmiki Corp scam: BJP leaders trying to lay siege to 'Vidhana Soudha' detained in Bengaluru
“We have not received any report from the CBI. They have arrested Nagendra. We have the information that he (Nagendra) is being pressured to name so-and-so persons,” Siddaramaiah said in a press conference.
He said the CBI is investigating it on its own.
“The CBI is investigating 'suo motu'. I am underlining this. The ED raided Valmiki Corporation chairperson Basanagouda Daddal and Nagendra’s houses. The agency summoned them for inquiry and arrested Nagendra,” he pointed out.
The CM further said the suicide note only names three people – Valmiki Corporation Managing Director J G Padmanabha, Accountant Parashuram Durgannanavar and Chief Manager of Union Bank of India’s MG Road branch in Bengaluru, Suchismita Rahul.
Chandrasekharan’s wife Kavitha too named the trio in her complaint.
On June 3, Deputy General Manager of the bank, Mahesh J lodged a complaint with the CBI.
“Since Chandrasekharan had mentioned in his suicide note that Nagendra gave oral instruction and also a video conversation surfaced wherein the minister’s name was mentioned, he was asked to resign,” Siddaramaiah explained.
Divulging details of the money trail, the Chief Minister said Rs 187.33 crore was transferred to UBI’s MG Road Branch from different accounts, including Rs 43 crore in the treasury.
“Out of Rs 187.33 crore, Rs 88.63 crore was transferred to 18 accounts in Hyderabad. Should they sit idly when the money is transferred there? Shouldn’t they have any responsibility and raise objections?” he wondered.
Siddaramaiah said the money was then credited to 199 additional accounts. All put together, Valmiki Corporation’s money went to 217 accounts.
He assured that the entire money would be recovered.
"Rs 85.25 is at different stages of recovery. We still have to get back close to Rs 4 crore. According to me, the entire money will be recovered. Whatever money was looted and distributed, is on the way to recovery,” he claimed.
Asked whether the Finance department did not notice the illegal transfer of money, Siddaramaiah said it goes in the normal course.
Noting that the board of the corporation prepares the action plan and not the finance department, the CM said even in the board meeting the transfer of money was not approved because on March 30, 2024, the board passed ‘a fake resolution’.
“It was all fake because the Model Code of Conduct for Lok Sabha election was in place. The Election Code of Conduct for the Lok Sabha election came into force on March 16,” he pointed out.
Siddaramaiah said the bank officers have also wondered how the officers conducted the board meeting. He added that this was an ‘organised crime’.
To a query about BJP’s demand for his resignation over the irregularities, Siddaramaiah counter-questioned, “Banks come under whose jurisdiction? Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman. Shouldn’t she resign?”
To another question whether this is a ‘joint scam by Centre and the state’, he dismissed it.
The Chief Minister, however, noted that he has never come across a case like this in his life.
Responding to BJP’s demand for a CBI probe, Siddaramaiah said once upon a time the saffron party leaders used to call it ‘Chor Bachao Institution’ (CBI).
“You never gave the case to the CBI when you were in power. I trust my police. The CBI has already entered the picture. ED is doing its job. SIT is also investigating it,” he pointed out.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
NADA suspends Bajrang Punia for four years for violation of anti-doping code
New Delhi, Nov 26: The National Anti-Doping Agency on Tuesday suspended Bajrang Punia for four years for his refusal to provide his sample for dope test on March 10 during selection trials for the national team.
NADA had first suspended the Tokyo Games bronze medallist wrestler on April 23 for the offence following which, the World Governing body UWW had also suspended him.
Bajrang had appealed against the provisional suspension and NADA’s Anti-Disciplinary Doping panel (ADDP) had revoked it on May 31 till NADA issues the notice of charge.
NADA, then on June 23 served the notice to the wrestler.
Bajrang, who joined Congress along with fellow wrestler Vinesh Phogat and was given charge of All India Kisan Congress, had challenged the charge on July 11 in a written submission following which hearings were held on September 20 and October 4.
"The Panel holds that the Athlete is liable for sanctions under Article 10.3.1 and liable for ineligibility for a period of 4 years," the ADDP said in its order.
The suspension means that Bajrang will not be able to return to competitive wrestling and apply for a coaching job abroad, if he aspires to.
"In the present case, since the Athlete had been provisionally suspended, the Panel accordingly holds that the Athlete’s period of his ineligibility for the period of 4 years shall commence from the date on which the notification was sent, i.e., 23.04.2024.
"Needless to say that on account of the lifting of the provisional suspension for the period from 31.05.2024 to 21.06.2024 shall not be credited into the total period of ineligibility of four years."
Bajrang has maintained since the beginning that he was given extremely prejudicial and unfair treatment with respect to doping control because of his involvement in the protest against former WFI President Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh.
Bajrang also maintained that he never refused to give sample but only demanded to know NADA’s response to his email where he sought answer why expired kits were sent to take his samples in December 2023.
NADA also explained the reason for its action, saying that the Chaperone/DCO had duly approached him and informed that he was required to provide a urine sample for dope analysis purposes.
Bajrang in his written submission said that the conduct of NADA in two previous instances had created mistrust in the athlete's mind, especially with NADA failing to acknowledge or even respond to their callous approach towards the doping control process in both such instances, the failure to take responsibility for their action pertaining to their dispersal of duties meant that the athlete was morally bound to take a stance in resort as a senior athlete who holds a voice in the sporting community.
Bajrang also said "it was not an outright refusal per se. The athlete was always willing to provide his sample provided that he first received a response from NADA concerning the use of expired kits."
However NADA said, "the outright refusal by the athlete to provide urine sample for the dope test was intentional and deliberate" and that "Athlete has demonstrated utter disregard towards his duties and responsibilities as per Articles 20.1 & 20.2 of the Anti Doping Rules, 2021."
