Karnataka HC directs state government to verify role of Y.Y. Bagali in Veerappan operation
Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has directed the state government to verify whether retired Assistant Administrative Officer of Mysuru Police, Y.Y. Bagali, was involved in the operation against forest outlaw Veerappan and to provide a detailed report.
The directive was issued during the hearing of a contempt petition filed by retired Commandant Ramadas Gowda and retired Assistant Administrative Officer Y.Y. Bagali. The petitioners alleged that the government and the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) failed to allot them plots in Kempegowda Layout at a subsidised rate of ₹2,100 per square metre, as directed by a previous High Court order.
The division bench of Justice K. Somashekar and Justice Venkatesh Naik noted that the state counsel informed the court that Bagali was not involved in the Veerappan operation. However, Bagali's counsel disputed this claim, asserting that he had actively participated in the operation. Taking note of the submissions, the court directed the state government to verify and report whether Bagali was indeed part of the Veerappan operation. The bench warned that if it is established that Bagali was not involved, he would face consequences, including the possible cancellation of his plot allotment. The court also instructed the government to take appropriate action in such a case. The matter was adjourned to February 12, 2025.
In 2017, BDA allotted a 60x40 sq ft plot to Ramadas Gowda and a 30x40 sq ft plot to Y.Y. Bagali in Kempegowda Layout. However, in 2018, the petitioners approached the High Court, arguing that, under a 2010 government order, police officers who participated in the Veerappan operation were entitled to plots at ₹2,100 per square metre. The petitioners contended that the prices set for their plots—₹24,219 and ₹21,258 per square metre, respectively—were unjustified.
In 2021, a single-judge bench of the High Court ruled in favour of the petitioners, directing the government and BDA to allot plots at the subsidised rate. Claiming non-compliance with this order, the petitioners filed a contempt plea, seeking action against the BDA Commissioner and the Chief Secretary of Karnataka.
During the hearing, the court criticised the government, questioning the allocation of plots in Kempegowda Layout instead of Veerappan's native village, Gopinatham. The bench observed that granting plots in Gopinatham would have been more appropriate and expressed dissatisfaction with the situation.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Congress using hijab issue to pacify minority anger, alleges Karnataka LoP R Ashoka
Bengaluru: Leader of Opposition in the Assembly R. Ashoka has accused the Congress government of using the hijab issue to placate what he described as discontent among minority voters after the Davanagere by-election.
In a post on X on Wednesday, Ashoka alleged that the state government, instead of addressing issues such as price rise, corruption, farmers’ distress and law and order, was attempting to retain its minority vote base by reviving the hijab issue.
Referring to the 2022 dress code introduced by the BJP government, which prohibited hijab in schools and colleges, Ashoka said the Karnataka High Court had upheld the policy and emphasised the importance of discipline in educational institutions.
He questioned the Congress government’s move to revisit the issue and asked whether setting aside the court-backed policy to benefit one community could be described as secularism.
Ashoka further alleged that while the government was willing to permit hijab, it continued to prohibit saffron shawls.
He accused the government of dividing students on religious lines rather than treating schools and colleges as spaces of equality.
Drawing a comparison with Mamata Banerjee’s government in West Bengal, Ashoka claimed that excessive appeasement politics had harmed the state and warned that the Congress in Karnataka could face a similar political response.
He said voters in Karnataka would teach the Congress a lesson for what he termed “vote-bank politics” and for compromising constitutional and judicial principles.
